Skip to main content

Passing Time with Passengers


          It’s ironic that one of the production companies behind Passengers is called Original Films, because that is certainly not what this movie is. Don’t get me wrong, its basic premise and set-up is incredibly fascinating but the way it goes about telling its story is often clichéd and contrived. Yet despite that, this film isn’t quite as bad as its 30% on Rotten Tomatoes would have you believe.
          Set during what’s presumably the last stage in a Civilization game, a massive ship called the Avalon is on a one hundred twenty year mission to a planet called Homestead II to colonize. Thousands of passengers and crew are on board in stasis, however due to a slight malfunction, Jim Preston (Chris Pratt) awakens ninety years early with no power to re-enter stasis. One year later, another passenger Aurora Lane (Jennifer Lawrence) awakens as well, and a romance develops between the two doomed to spend the rest of their lives alone on this spaceship.
          The visuals are really good, and not just in the CGI effects, but the production design is terrific. You get a real feel for this ship, its vastness and variance. Though the outer corkscrew design is funny at first, it is fairly unique, and the interior looks great. If you had to be trapped on a ship for the rest of your life, this isn’t a bad one. It’s highly technologically advanced, and diverse in recreation and faculties, all of which is shot wonderfully.
          Also the characters are decent enough. Though neither is all that interesting, Chris Pratt and Jennifer Lawrence perform their desperation well, and are as usual pretty likeable. They have alright chemistry. The portion early on where Jim is on his own is very well done, you feel his hopelessness, and Pratt shows he can perform serious drama as well as charming comedy. Michael Sheen plays a robotic bartender called Arnold who keeps them company, and he’s the most enjoyable character. What then, is the major problem with this movie?
          Well simply enough, it’s the story. Though the idea is really promising, the execution doesn’t live up to potential. It also has an unfortunate tendency to handle curious story facets poorly. Early on, there’s a moral dilemma that permeates the rest of the film and it’s a very interesting one. I actually like it a lot, and the hypothetical it poses the audience. But I feel like it would have worked a lot better narratively if it was a twist revealed later on. Because of its placement in the story, it lessens the tension as you’re just waiting for the expected to occur. And there are a few clichés in this movie, some regarding the romance, others with the state of the ship itself. 
          Hints are repeatedly dropped that whatever woke these passengers early is affecting the ships’ functioning capabilities as well. And this comes to a head in the last act where the movie needs to become a thriller. But the romance and thriller elements don’t really work together and it’s quite distracting. There’s a new element introduced late in the film that’s incredibly pointless and a pure plot device, just as hastily and conveniently done away with. Which is a shame because taken in another direction, it could have led to something much better, some drama you could really sink your teeth into. The climax is pretty frustrating, it’s way too repetitive, not nearly as gripping as it should be, and is trying too hard to wrap up both the thriller and romantic elements that neither is fully satisfying. 
          And of course there’s a lot this film is borrowing from other science fiction. Every time the characters leave the ship to float outside it’s very reminiscent of Gravity. There are elements of The Martian, Alien, and 2001 in there as well. The design of Arnold’s bar is pretty much a direct rip-off of The Shining with Arnold dressed in the same outfit as that films’ ghostly bartender Lloyd. And then the last act ship malfunction and attempt to fix it is akin to dozens of episodes of Star Trek, only done with a better budget.
          Technically, Passengers isn’t a good film. It’s story is pretty sloppy, it doesn’t know how to balance certain elements, and has a poor and fairly predictable last act. But I am still glad I saw it. This movie was directed by Morten Tyldum who previously made The Imitation Game and while Passengers isn’t as good, it has a few more memorable elements to it. The idea behind the story and the set-up itself is really intriguing to me, and the good effects, production design and performances make it believable for a lot of the runtime. Even with the expected plot points and early twist, I appreciated the first couple acts and was curious where it was going to go. In the end, it doesn’t work as a whole, but it’s not quite a waste of time. Just don’t pay full price.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Disney's Mulan, Cultural Appropriation, and Exploitation

I’m late on this one I know. I wasn’t willing to spend thirty bucks back in September for a movie experience I knew was going to be far poorer than if I had paid half that at a theatre. So I waited for it to hit streaming for free to give it a shot. In the meantime I heard that it wasn’t very good, but I remained determined not to skip it entirely, partly out of sympathy for director Niki Caro and partly out of morbid curiosity. Disney’s live-action Mulan  I was actually mildly looking forward to early in the year in spite of my well-documented distaste for this series of creative dead zones by the most powerful media conglomerate on earth. Mulan  was never one of Disney’s classics, a movie extremely of its time in its “girl power” gender politics and with a decidedly American take on ancient Chinese mythology. It got by on a couple good songs and a strong lead, but it was a movie that could be improved upon, and this new version looked like it had the potential to do that, emphasizing

So I Guess Comics Kingdom Sucks Now...

So, I guess Comics Kingdom sucks now. The website run by King Features Syndicate hosting a bunch of their licensed comic strips from classics like Beetle Bailey , Blondie , and Dennis the Menace  to great new strips like Retail , The Pajama Diaries , and Edison Lee  (as well as Sherman’s Lagoon , Zits , On the Fastrack , etc.) underwent a major relaunch early last week that is in just about every way a massive downgrade. The problems are numerous. The layout is distracting and cheap, far more space is allocated for ads so the strips themselves are displayed too small, the banner from which you could formerly browse for other strips is gone (meaning you have to go to the homepage to find other comics you like or discover new ones), the comments section is a joke –not refreshing itself daily so that every comment made on an individual strip remains attached to ALL strips, there’s no more blog or special features on individual comics pages which effectively barricades the cartoonis

The Wizard of Oz: Birth of Imagination

“Somewhere over the rainbow, skies are blue; and the dreams that you dare to dream really do come true.” I don’t think I’ve sat down and watched The Wizard of Oz  in more than fifteen years. Among the first things I noticed doing so now in 2019, nearly eighty years to the day of its original release on August 25th, 1939, was the amount of obvious foreshadowing in the first twenty minutes. The farmhands are each equated with their later analogues through blatant metaphors and personality quirks (Huck’s “head made out of straw” comment), Professor Marvel is clearly a fraud in spite of his good nature, Dorothy at one point straight up calls Miss Gulch a “wicked old witch”. We don’t notice these things watching the film as children, or maybe we do and reason that it doesn’t matter. It still doesn’t matter. Despite being the part of the movie we’re not supposed to care about, the portrait of a dreary Kansas bedighted by one instant icon of a song, those opening scenes are extrao