Skip to main content

How to Talk to Aliens


          Ever since H.G. Wells’ War of the Worlds, we’ve been fascinated with alien invasion stories. The idea of a power we know nothing about coming to Earth is a very foreboding one and over the years we’ve used it as an outlet for our societal fears and tensions. But few have taken a less hostile approach to their depiction of alien visitors. Can this unconventional take on an old story work for Arrival, the newest film from Canadian director Denis Villeneuve?
          A host of UFOs arrive on Earth setting down at various locations planet-wide and the world governments decide tor try and communicate. Enter Louise (Amy Adams), an expert linguist brought to the American landing location in Montana to attempt to decipher the alien language. She’s accompanied by theoretical physicist Ian (Jeremy Renner), and together they work to understand these creatures and learn why they’ve come to Earth.
          The idea of portraying alien contact in a realistic context is nothing new in movies. Close Encounters of the Third Kind and District 9 among other films have explored this. What Arrival does differently is it focuses on communication rather than conflict with the alien counterparts. Great science fiction, in fact great storytelling in general, is that which allows us to discover something about ourselves. Arrival does this for one by showing us just how complex and confusing our methods of communication are. From an objective standpoint this movie really emphasizes how many ways there are to interpret meanings that we don’t think twice about. But while it’s fascinating, the slow pace makes parts of the film a bit of a bore. And the visuals aren’t compelling enough to make up for this. The interior of the alien ships are minimalist in design which doesn’t give the setting any character. The aliens themselves, large and squid-like with long looming tentacles are nothing new in design, being not all that dissimilar to the invading antagonists of Wells’ 1897 novel.
          The human characters are a little more fleshed out. As usual, Amy Adams is really good. This is a character who’s both quite fearful and incredibly curious about the aliens. Their language which they communicate through symbols made of a kind of gas is something of a puzzle to her. And I like the detail that the alien language very much like human written language has similar patterns from one character to the next. There are other dimensions to Louise that are explored as the film moves along which Adams performs consistently. Renner is also pretty good, the more enjoyable of the two as though he’s a scientist, he has a common guy’s attitude towards this work. Forest Whitaker plays the military leader Colonel Weber who’s overseeing the first contact: he’s alright apart from a strange accent choice. And Michael Stuhlbarg may be forever stuck playing supporting roles in movies like this, but is he ever good at them! In this film he plays Agent Halpern and gets a lot more to do than his last throwaway role in Doctor Strange.
          Like with Christopher Nolan’s Interstellar, some will be tempted to compare this film favourably to the likes of 2001: A Space Odyssey. Arrival is nowhere near that level of abstract and visual brilliance, though the alien vessels themselves in their mysterious aura and solemn black shapes are clearly hearkening back to the monoliths from that film. Nonetheless this is a very cerebral work of sci-fi in its ideas and concepts, as well its themes on humanity and the nature of the universe. The centrepiece of communication, both between the humans and aliens as well as humans amongst themselves is a good focus and gives way for relatable commentary. I can’t go into detail as to what exactly the other ideas are, but they’re quite intriguing. They’re notions that I think are beyond this film itself in their scope, and worthy of exploration in a narrative style less conventional like 2001. And you leave the movie really contemplating its meaning which is a very good thing. Even if some of the reveals adding to this deeper effectiveness of the film come at the expense of the realistic atmosphere it was trying to keep beforehand.
          Arrival is a movie that really opens itself up for analysis. Though it’s a smart movie, it isn’t as engaging as it wants to be. There’s something missing in the execution. With some better pacing, and more creative visuals, it would probably be one of the best movies of 2016. But it over-reaches a little on its premise making for a film that’s certainly not bad, but not really great either. It’s just… interesting. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Disney's Mulan, Cultural Appropriation, and Exploitation

I’m late on this one I know. I wasn’t willing to spend thirty bucks back in September for a movie experience I knew was going to be far poorer than if I had paid half that at a theatre. So I waited for it to hit streaming for free to give it a shot. In the meantime I heard that it wasn’t very good, but I remained determined not to skip it entirely, partly out of sympathy for director Niki Caro and partly out of morbid curiosity. Disney’s live-action Mulan  I was actually mildly looking forward to early in the year in spite of my well-documented distaste for this series of creative dead zones by the most powerful media conglomerate on earth. Mulan  was never one of Disney’s classics, a movie extremely of its time in its “girl power” gender politics and with a decidedly American take on ancient Chinese mythology. It got by on a couple good songs and a strong lead, but it was a movie that could be improved upon, and this new version looked like it had the potential to do that, emphasizing

The Hays Code was Bad, Sex in Movies is Good

Don't Look Now (1973) Will Hays, Who Knows About Sex In 1930, former Republican politician and chair of the Motion Picture Association of America Will Hayes introduced a series of self-censorship guidelines for the movie industry in response to a mixture of celebrity scandals and lobbying from the Catholic Church against various ‘immoralities’ creating a perception of Hollywood as corrupt and indecent. The Hays Code, or the Motion Picture Production Code, was formally adopted in 1930, though not stringently enforced until 1934 under the auspices of Joseph Breen. It laid out a careful list of what was and wasn’t acceptable for a film expecting major distribution. It stipulated rules against profanity, the depiction of miscegenation, and offensive portrayals of the clergy, but a lot of it was based around sexual content: “sexual perversion” of any kind was disallowed, as were any opaquely textual or visual allusions to reproduction, and right near the top “No licentious or suggestiv

Pixar Sundays: The Incredibles (2004)

          Brad Bird was already a master by the time he came to Pixar. Not only did he hone his craft as an early director on The Simpsons , but he directed a little animated film for Warner Bros. in 1999, that though not a box office success was loved by critics and quickly grew a cult following. The Iron Giant is now among many people’s favourite animated movies. Likewise, Bird’s feature debut at Pixar, The Incredibles , his own variation of a superhero movie, is often considered one of the studio’s best. And for very good reason, as the most talented director at Pixar shows.            Superheroes were once the world’s greatest crime-fighting force until several lawsuits for collateral damage (and in the case of Mr. Incredible, a hilarious suicide prevention), outlawed their vigilantism. Fifteen years later Mr. Incredible, now living as Bob Parr, has a family with his wife Helen, the former Elastigirl. But Bob, in a combination of mid-life crisis and nostalgia for the old day