Skip to main content

An Honest Look at The Edge of Seventeen


          High school is a rotten period in your life. Granted some make it through better than others, but the anxiety of social, personal, and academic choices coinciding with raging hormones and constant adjustments in both your physical appearance and emotional state makes it a tough road. Everything and nothing matters. And it’s this cesspool of teenage-hood that debut director Kelly Fremon Craig revisits in The Edge of Seventeen
          Nadine (Hailee Steinfeld) is a troubled and very abrasive high school junior who manages to slog through everyday life until her best and only friend Krista (Haley Lu Richardson) sleeps with her seemingly perfect older brother Darian (Blake Jenner). When they become a couple, Nadine goes to extreme lengths to cope with not only the fractured relationship, but her own awkward behaviour and social life.
          One of the most impressive things about this movie is the realism. Unlike in a lot of teen movies, the characters in this film act like real teenagers. And it makes you much more invested when the film can legitimately transport you as an adult back to that time in life. Just as in real life, these characters swear liberally, use sexual vocabulary, are sexually active, and drink alcohol. There’s no attempt to sugar-coat how they behave and live their lives which is really refreshing. Often they act on impulse, and we see especially in Nadine a disregard for conventional authority.
          Nadine’s every action in this movie is based on emotion, and she’s continually trying to find some kind of direction, or at least a remedy to her confusion and alienation. And Steinfeld plays her excellently. Though you frequently disagree with her actions, they’re understandable given what we know about her character through a backstory early on. But even then it’s not so simple. Teen movies have a hard task in that most conflicts therein are relatively first-world problems. Nadine’s attempts to get her crush to notice her, her insecurity about her appearance, and fear that she’s losing her long-time friend aren’t high stakes except to her. But at some point these things were just as important to any of us. Steinfeld perhaps because of her age taps into this character’s disoriented psychology well, but also conveys it identifiably through an impassioned and dedicated performance. This may even be an Oscar-calibre performance. 
          All the supporting characters are more or less defined through their relationship to Nadine. Richardson plays the hurt friend very well, and Jenner (who’s back in high school after playing a college student in Everybody Wants Some) is really good as well. Anyone with a sibling can in some way relate to how they treat each other. And you can see how living in his shadow has affected Nadine’s personality and makes the “betrayal” feel ever more resonant. Kyra Sedgwick is good as Nadine’s put-upon mother, who also has a very troubled relationship with her due to favouring Darian. A fellow student called Erwin who’s role in the story is pretty obvious, is mostly likeable, an introvert who wants to be an extrovert, though occasionally he’s a little too awkward. The show-stealer though is Woody Harrelson as Nadine’s history teacher Mr. Bruner, who’s both her confidant and punching bag. The rapport these two have where despite the fact she’s a student, he’s constantly mocking her, is tremendous. He’s a very fun spin on the inspiring teacher character. And one joke he has that was in most of the trailers, makes me, an English grad laugh every time.
          Much of the plot in this movie is standard for the genre. It’s got a lot that you’ve seen before. But The Edge of Seventeen manages to make its clichés feel brand new. I think because of Steinfeld’s performance, the largely true portrayal of teenage life, and even some deeper notions make this possible. The final act of this movie looks like it’s setting up one of a few clichés but actually plays out in a more mature way than I expected. The theme of what you think you want versus what you actually want plays a part. There are also good messages about empathy and self-worth. These ideas and the way the film examines teenage issues makes this a great movie for teens, that also doesn’t talk down to them. Who was the last director that did that really well?
          Yeah, the critics aren’t unjustified in comparing The Edge of Seventeen favourably to the works of John Hughes. It’s certainly one of the most honest coming-of-age teen movies since his films of the 80s. The fact that it’s also incredibly funny and one of the best written films of the year is a bonus. Fremon Craig like Hughes, really understands this subject matter and it makes for an unexpectedly great film that speaks to everyone.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Strange History of the American Spoof Movie

Parody movies have been around for a lot longer than we tend to think of them. Even from the earliest days of Hollywood there were movies meant to satirize a particular subject or genre. In the silent era, Buster Keaton was responsible for a few. And in the early sound era, almost as soon as the monster pictures took off did you see comic versions of them -Abbott and Costello hosting a few. But parody movies tended to be subtle for most of cinema history, or parody came in conjunction with another goal of the comedy. It really wasn’t until the 1980s and 90s that it took off and became popularly understood. And there is perhaps a line to be drawn to the counterculture comedy explosion that began in the 1970s through avenues like  Saturday Night Live , which frequently parodied from even its earliest years popular movies and cultural properties of the time. But that is still a way’s back. To my generation though, ‘parody movie’ is perhaps a less known term than the more blunt ‘s...

Notes on the Title Cards of The Lord of the Rings

It might be sacrilege for one who both considers The Lord of the Rings  trilogy to be one of the greatest triumphs of cinema and has been an avid lover of the films since adolescence, to declare that the original theatrical cuts of the films are better than the much beloved extended editions. Easily it’s my most controversial opinion regarding these movies. Don’t get me wrong, I do like the extended editions quite a lot, especially as someone who just enjoys spending time in that universe. They flesh it out more, add extra flavour, and in increasing the length by about an hour really emphasize the epic quality of these films. But I find that the original cuts are generally more cleanly paced, more seamlessly edited, and much more accessible to audiences. All the stuff there is to love about The Lord of the Rings  is there in the original versions, the plethora of new and extended scenes merely add to that for fans. And of those, they fall into three camps for me: 1....

Back to the Feature: New York, New York (1977)

New York, New York  is a two hour forty minute musical movie largely about a toxic relationship and I understand why it was Martin Scorsese’s first big flop. Some have blamed its poor reception on the kind of movie it was, of a style and tone Scorsese wasn’t known for, but I find that hard to believe. Even after only five films, he’d proven himself an extremely versatile director, and Alice Doesn’t Live Here Anymore  found an audience. Sure this jazz musical love letter to New York City was following up Taxi Driver and its’ far more cynical take on the city, but then it’s also ‘from the director of Taxi Driver ’ which itself was a big hit. Was it a matter of public appetite for musicals, or mere word of mouth and early critical reception that dissuaded viewers? Irrespective of that, I was stunned to discover this movie was the origin of the titular song, which I’d assumed was much older (it’s definitely got the sound of something that might have come out of the Jazz sce...