Skip to main content

Allied Shoots to be the Next Great War Romance


          Robert Zemeckis is really going out of his way to prove how versatile a director he is. Would you believe Back to the Future, Who Framed Roger Rabbit?, Forrest Gump, and The Polar Express were made by the same man? Allied is just as distinct, at least from his previous works: a World War II romance about a pair of spies with the perfect title. Does he pull this off as much as his other disparate films?
          In the early years of the Second World War, Canadian intelligence operative Max Vatan (Brad Pitt) is sent to Casablanca where he meets his liaison, a French Resistance fighter who’s infiltrated the local society called Marianne Beausejour (Marion Cotillard). Working together on their secret mission, they soon fall in love and later marry. However the relationship becomes a lot more tenuous, at least for Max, when his superiors inform him Marianne may be a German spy. So Max in secret tries to dig up proof that his wife is who she says she is and save her from execution if she’s proven guilty.
          This movie is clearly drawing a lot of influence from classical cinema, especially Casablanca. A number of moments in the first act which is entirely set in Casablanca, as well as even in the latter half feel like almost direct parallels to that film. I can’t blame Allied too much as Casablanca is the gold standard for war-time romances. But there are a few moments where the similarities are distracting. For the most part the film overcomes this thanks to a pretty good tension-fuelled plot. There are a few scenes early on where the threat of exposure creeps up on our heroes, but it’s in the latter parts when the evidence builds up to implicate Marianne that you’re really kept attentive and very engaged with what happens next. Especially when certain developments make you second guess what the outcome will be.
          But this film probably wouldn’t pull any of this off if not for the terrific chemistry between Pitt and Cotillard. Pitt’s performance is smooth as always, but with a sincerity that makes his heartbreak at the idea of his wife being a spy convincing. And Marion Cotillard is not only stunning, but superbly committed, both in her skilled covert work in Casablanca, as well as her subtle suggestions of a duplicitous nature conveyed purely through the strength of her physical performance. The two work with each other very well and their romance comes off as very genuine. It’s built slowly which can dull the films’ overall pace but it makes you all the more invested when it looks like Marianne may have been faking her feelings the whole time. Though the film is concerned with these two front and centre, there are still good performances from a bevy of supporting players including Jared Harris, Simon McBurney, Anton Lesser, Matthew Goode, and Lizzy Caplan. 
          Zemeckis directs with confidence, knowing just when to focus on the characters and the circumstances. The cinematography is very good too, taking advantage of the ravaged London during an air raid, or the beauty of the deserts of Morocco. There’s one scene (a sex scene if you must know) that is shot with a surprising combination of intimacy and claustrophobia that stands out. And one thing I never thought would stick out to me about this kind of film is the costuming which is really appropriate for the period, but nonetheless radiant, especially on Cotillard. Again, it feels very much a callback to classic romances in this regard. Throughout the movie though there is definite melodrama to the romance, and for some it may be a little much. I don’t mind it for the most part, but by the end it is overdone and is trying too hard to again feel like a classic movie.
          If you’re a fan of war-time romances, Allied is probably one you’re going to like. And it has an interesting conflict and theme of how much you can trust someone. If you don’t care so much for this kind of film, you still may enjoy it for the expert direction, great performances, and well-executed tension. It may not be what its filmmakers’ intended, one of the best films of the year, but it is an engaging movie with more than a few reasons to see. I can assure you despite all the comparisons because of a similar set-up and leading man, it’s much a better movie than Mr. and Mrs. Smith.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Disney's Mulan, Cultural Appropriation, and Exploitation

I’m late on this one I know. I wasn’t willing to spend thirty bucks back in September for a movie experience I knew was going to be far poorer than if I had paid half that at a theatre. So I waited for it to hit streaming for free to give it a shot. In the meantime I heard that it wasn’t very good, but I remained determined not to skip it entirely, partly out of sympathy for director Niki Caro and partly out of morbid curiosity. Disney’s live-action Mulan  I was actually mildly looking forward to early in the year in spite of my well-documented distaste for this series of creative dead zones by the most powerful media conglomerate on earth. Mulan  was never one of Disney’s classics, a movie extremely of its time in its “girl power” gender politics and with a decidedly American take on ancient Chinese mythology. It got by on a couple good songs and a strong lead, but it was a movie that could be improved upon, and this new version looked like it had the potential to do that, em...

The Wizard of Oz: Birth of Imagination

“Somewhere over the rainbow, skies are blue; and the dreams that you dare to dream really do come true.” I don’t think I’ve sat down and watched The Wizard of Oz  in more than fifteen years. Among the first things I noticed doing so now in 2019, nearly eighty years to the day of its original release on August 25th, 1939, was the amount of obvious foreshadowing in the first twenty minutes. The farmhands are each equated with their later analogues through blatant metaphors and personality quirks (Huck’s “head made out of straw” comment), Professor Marvel is clearly a fraud in spite of his good nature, Dorothy at one point straight up calls Miss Gulch a “wicked old witch”. We don’t notice these things watching the film as children, or maybe we do and reason that it doesn’t matter. It still doesn’t matter. Despite being the part of the movie we’re not supposed to care about, the portrait of a dreary Kansas bedighted by one instant icon of a song, those opening sce...

So I Guess Comics Kingdom Sucks Now...

So, I guess Comics Kingdom sucks now. The website run by King Features Syndicate hosting a bunch of their licensed comic strips from classics like Beetle Bailey , Blondie , and Dennis the Menace  to great new strips like Retail , The Pajama Diaries , and Edison Lee  (as well as Sherman’s Lagoon , Zits , On the Fastrack , etc.) underwent a major relaunch early last week that is in just about every way a massive downgrade. The problems are numerous. The layout is distracting and cheap, far more space is allocated for ads so the strips themselves are displayed too small, the banner from which you could formerly browse for other strips is gone (meaning you have to go to the homepage to find other comics you like or discover new ones), the comments section is a joke –not refreshing itself daily so that every comment made on an individual strip remains attached to ALL strips, there’s no more blog or special features on individual comics pages which effectively barricades the ...