Skip to main content

Accounting Made Awesome?


         The Accountant is not a very exciting name for an action film. When you think of the title “accountant”, you often associate it with monotony and tediousness. This film from director Gavin O’Connor tries to subvert that stereotype, which it does a little, but not enough.
          Christian Wolff (Ben Affleck) is an autistic mathematics genius who works as a small-time public accountant by day, but secretly makes a fortune managing the accounts of a number of dangerous criminal organizations. Finding work with a robotics company, he uncovers a laundering scheme that puts his life and his assistant Dana’s (Anna Kendrick) in danger. While this is happening, he’s being tailed by a Treasury agent (J.K. Simmons), and his analyst (Cynthia Addai-Robinson).
          While the action is really decent boasting some pretty impressive fight choreography, the story is too convoluted for its own good. If you don’t understand accounting practices and terminology, it’s going to be hard to keep up with exactly what’s going on or where the film’s going. At various points in the film, we’re privy to flashbacks to Chris’ childhood, detailing how his father pushed him into extreme self-defence and just generally what his life experience has been like with his condition. It also cuts every so often to a hitman (Jon Bernthal) who’s loosely connected to the main plot. Both these recurring diversions exist to contribute context to certain late story points and so until their relevance becomes known, they drag the film’s pacing. The only subplot that works is the FBI thread, partly because we learn more about Chris and what he’s done as an accountant. 
          Chris Wolff is a very interesting character in theory. How often do you see an action hero with a developmental disorder? But I feel Ben Affleck was miscast. I admire his dedication and his willingness to challenge himself, but he doesn’t suit this kind of character. Affleck’s just not someone you would ever buy as socially awkward. A committed method actor is what’s needed for this performance, as aside from the autistic quirks (including a bit that’s very similar to A Beautiful Mind), Chris doesn’t leave the impression he should. Affleck’s not bad, and in one scene where he has a breakdown he does pretty well. But he just doesn’t give the character any personality apart from his disorder. It’s another instance where it feels like their banking on a franchise around this character, like Jason Bourne. I wouldn’t get my hopes up. As for the rest of the cast, Kendrick’s fine, but she and Bernthal aren’t doing anything unique here. She’s the typical bubbly, cute new girl while he’s the tough agent with a slight sense of humour. There are decent performances though from relative newcomer Addai-Robinson and John Lithgow as the CEO of the robotics corporation. And J.K. Simmons is of course, terrific. He’s one of the great character actors working today, keeping your attention every time he’s on screen. There’s one scene where we see his backstory and get more of a feel for his character, and honestly I would’ve preferred a whole movie about him.
          The film has a sense of humour which works to its advantage every so often. Like one scene where Chris awkwardly waves at a couple clients after saving them from a pair of violent goons or when Dana tries to converse with him casually for the first time. Indeed Chris’ interactions with Dana can get a laugh once in a while. The film walks a very good line between the humour in his social interaction while not being offensive. But it’s not quite enough to save the film, especially by the climax which is where the film disintegrates. There’s a development that comes out of nowhere, and then not much of a resolution, the action just kind of stops. A number of questions are raised, a few contrivances, it’s almost like the film’s given up on itself.
          Yet for all these faults there’s a good movie trying to get out. A lot of the ideas in this are good, they just needed more time and focus. A different leading actor, a less complex plot, a little more action, some cutting of the fat (this movie is a little too long), and a complete re-haul of the climax, this could’ve been the next great action movie. As is, it’s not really bad, certainly well enough made, good-intentioned with how sympathetic it is in its portrayal of kids with autism, and I hope Gavin O’Connor gets more work. It’s just sadly as forgettable as most accountants.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Notes on the Title Cards of The Lord of the Rings

It might be sacrilege for one who both considers The Lord of the Rings  trilogy to be one of the greatest triumphs of cinema and has been an avid lover of the films since adolescence, to declare that the original theatrical cuts of the films are better than the much beloved extended editions. Easily it’s my most controversial opinion regarding these movies. Don’t get me wrong, I do like the extended editions quite a lot, especially as someone who just enjoys spending time in that universe. They flesh it out more, add extra flavour, and in increasing the length by about an hour really emphasize the epic quality of these films. But I find that the original cuts are generally more cleanly paced, more seamlessly edited, and much more accessible to audiences. All the stuff there is to love about The Lord of the Rings  is there in the original versions, the plethora of new and extended scenes merely add to that for fans. And of those, they fall into three camps for me: 1....

The Subtle Sensitivity of the Cinema of Wong Kar-wai

When I think of Wong Kar-wai, I think of nighttime and neon lights, I think of the image of lonely people sitting in cafes or bars as the world passes behind them, mere flashes of movement; I think of love and quiet, sombre heartbreak, the sensuality that exists between people but is rarely fully or openly expressed. Mostly I think of the mood of melancholy, yet how this can be beautiful, colourful, inspiring even. A feeling of gloominess at the complexity of messy human relationships, though tinged with an unmitigated joy in the sensation of that feeling. And a warmth, generated by light and colour, that cuts through to the solitude of our very soul. This isn’t a broadly definitive quality of Wong’s body of work -certainly it isn’t so much true of his martial arts films Ashes of Time  and The Grandmaster. But those most affectionate movies on my memory: Chungking Express , Fallen Angels , Happy Together , 2046 , of course  In the Mood for Love , and even My Blueberry Nig...

The Prince of Egypt: The Humanized Exodus

Moses and the story of the Exodus is one of the most influential mythologies of world history. It’s a centrepoint of the Abrahamic religions, and has directly influenced the society, culture, values, and laws of many civilizations. Not to mention, it’s a very powerful story, and one that unsurprisingly continues to resonate incredibly across the globe. In western culture, the story of Moses has been retold dozens of times in various mediums, most recognizably in the last century through film. And these adaptations have ranged from the iconic: Cecil B. DeMille’s The Ten Commandments;  to the infamous: Ridley Scott’s Exodus: Gods and Kings . But everyone seems to forget the one movie between those two that I’d argue has them both beat. As perhaps the best telling of one of the most influential stories of all time, I feel people don’t talk about The Prince of Egypt  nearly enough. The 1998 animated epic from DreamWorks is a breathtakingly stunning, concise but compelling, ...