Skip to main content

Sully Sticks the Landing


          I remember how big a deal it was on January 15th, 2009 when a passenger flight in New York ran into a flock of geese and had to make an emergency landing on the Hudson River. But even that wasn’t the most astonishing thing; it was that the captain Chesley “Sully” Sullenberger managed to do this with no casualties to 155 people on board. For a few weeks it was all the media could talk about, praising Sully as a hero. 
          But what many of us maybe didn’t realize, was the extensive inquest into the incident; and it’s this as well as the landing itself that’s the subject of Clint Eastwood’s new film Sully.
          The movie opens following the whole Hudson River episode with Sully (Tom Hanks) dealing with the aftermath. This includes both a series of monotonous meetings with airline officials not too happy to have lost their plane, as well as his new status as a celebrity and “hero” of New York. But through all this Sully’s troubled, reflecting on the incident as well as envisioning the disasters that could have taken place as he and his superiors wonder if the emergency landing could have been avoided.
          Sully reminds me a lot of the film Flight, which also dealt with a pilot steeped in celebrity and controversy following a miracle landing. But unlike that film this one is based on a true story and Sully didn’t have a drug problem. It’s commitment to realism is one of its biggest strengths. Not only in how Sully’s unprepared for his sudden hero worship, his reactions to the media; but in the Hudson landing itself. The film shows us the landing in a non-linear way that actually works pretty well and makes sense in the present context. The look of the plane, the regular take-off procedures, the flight attendants and their geniality to the passengers. It does a great job putting you in the situation and allows the audience to experience the near-disaster and feel what everyone aboard was going through. We see how the floatation devices are deployed, the rescue carried out by first responders, and it’s very interesting. We’re given glimpses into the personalities of some of the passengers and even though you know everyone survives, there’s still some suspense at work. And though the movie’s pace is a bit slow, you’re with it for most of the runtime.
          Aaron Eckhart is good as Sully’s loyal first officer Jeff Skiles, and so is Laura Linney as Sully’s wife (though sadly she doesn’t get nearly enough to do in this film). But of course this is Tom Hanks’ movie. And as always, Hanks is terrific! He really is the best part of the film, conveying both the confidence and self-doubt of this man with genuine dedication. There are points in the story when evidence comes to light and you get an idea of the circumstances, that you yourself even wonder if Sully made the right choice. He also plays the reluctant celebrity really well and the quick thinker under pressure, relying on experience over protocol where need be. It may not be quite as great as his last performance as a captain (he’s had more than a few) in Captain Phillips, but it’s definitely proof Hanks is still one of the best. Also Mike O’Malley and Anna Gunn deserve a shout-out for their performances as the investigators.
          The only flaws with this movie are that maybe there was a bit too much repetition. The events of January 15th are played out at multiple points in the film through either flashback or record and I feel like we were seeing the same thing one time too many. There’s only so many times an airplane landing in a river can look exciting. We got a couple flashbacks to Sully’s early life as a pilot which are just padding. It’s not really relevant to the plot and is merely showcasing a backstory that we’re already given by Sully’s remarks about having been a pilot for forty years. There’s also a scene where the cast appear on Letterman and the effects don’t quite blend in to seven year old footage of that show. Forrest Gump this ain’t. They probably should have just recreated the interview like they did with Katie Couric.
          But overall, Sully is a pretty good time. With a great leading performance, a sense of realism, and a story presentation that’s very engrossing. It’s a fascinating look into a fascinating event, and a man who though humble, deserves quite a bit of credit for his heroic actions. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Disney's Mulan, Cultural Appropriation, and Exploitation

I’m late on this one I know. I wasn’t willing to spend thirty bucks back in September for a movie experience I knew was going to be far poorer than if I had paid half that at a theatre. So I waited for it to hit streaming for free to give it a shot. In the meantime I heard that it wasn’t very good, but I remained determined not to skip it entirely, partly out of sympathy for director Niki Caro and partly out of morbid curiosity. Disney’s live-action Mulan  I was actually mildly looking forward to early in the year in spite of my well-documented distaste for this series of creative dead zones by the most powerful media conglomerate on earth. Mulan  was never one of Disney’s classics, a movie extremely of its time in its “girl power” gender politics and with a decidedly American take on ancient Chinese mythology. It got by on a couple good songs and a strong lead, but it was a movie that could be improved upon, and this new version looked like it had the potential to do that, emphasizing

The Hays Code was Bad, Sex in Movies is Good

Don't Look Now (1973) Will Hays, Who Knows About Sex In 1930, former Republican politician and chair of the Motion Picture Association of America Will Hayes introduced a series of self-censorship guidelines for the movie industry in response to a mixture of celebrity scandals and lobbying from the Catholic Church against various ‘immoralities’ creating a perception of Hollywood as corrupt and indecent. The Hays Code, or the Motion Picture Production Code, was formally adopted in 1930, though not stringently enforced until 1934 under the auspices of Joseph Breen. It laid out a careful list of what was and wasn’t acceptable for a film expecting major distribution. It stipulated rules against profanity, the depiction of miscegenation, and offensive portrayals of the clergy, but a lot of it was based around sexual content: “sexual perversion” of any kind was disallowed, as were any opaquely textual or visual allusions to reproduction, and right near the top “No licentious or suggestiv

Pixar Sundays: The Incredibles (2004)

          Brad Bird was already a master by the time he came to Pixar. Not only did he hone his craft as an early director on The Simpsons , but he directed a little animated film for Warner Bros. in 1999, that though not a box office success was loved by critics and quickly grew a cult following. The Iron Giant is now among many people’s favourite animated movies. Likewise, Bird’s feature debut at Pixar, The Incredibles , his own variation of a superhero movie, is often considered one of the studio’s best. And for very good reason, as the most talented director at Pixar shows.            Superheroes were once the world’s greatest crime-fighting force until several lawsuits for collateral damage (and in the case of Mr. Incredible, a hilarious suicide prevention), outlawed their vigilantism. Fifteen years later Mr. Incredible, now living as Bob Parr, has a family with his wife Helen, the former Elastigirl. But Bob, in a combination of mid-life crisis and nostalgia for the old day