Skip to main content

John Candy Month: Uncle Buck (1989)


          You know, there’s a reason the Canadian Screen Awards have been nicknamed “the Candys”. Okay yeah, it may seem the obvious shorthand, but it’s also in reference to one of Canada’s greatest talents . Not long before that, the John Candy Box Theatre opened in Toronto. Twenty-two years after his death we’re still finding ways to pay tribute to him. And why? Because John Candy was amazing! 
          Not only is he one of my favourite famous Canadians, but he’s one of my favourite actors. He was a brilliant performer both in comedic and dramatic roles, but he was exceptionally talented when it came to comedy. He was the consistent scene-stealer and star performer on SCTV, which is quite a feat considering the talent he was surrounded by, but of course he’s remembered for his movies. Though sometimes they themselves weren’t always good, Candy put so much effort into them, you can’t help but love him for it.
          So for the month of September I’ve decided to look back on John Candy’s career. Each week I’ll be reviewing a different movie of his that demonstrates his talent and legacy. But they have to be movies where he had a starring role, which means no Stripes, Splash, or Spaceballs, as good as those movies are. Also I won’t be including my personal favourite John Candy movie, Planes, Trains, & Automobiles, because I’ve already reviewed it. Check it out and see why it’s one of the best comedies of all time. But as for the month ahead, let’s see why a man with a career cut sadly so short, has left such an important mark.



          So why don’t we begin with what some say is the definitive movie of John Candy’s career, Uncle Buck. Candy and John Hughes were good friends and you can see it in their collaborations. Particularly, Hughes had an affinity for writing Candy roles as kind-hearted but irresponsible, accident-prone foils. This is the case in Planes, Trains, & Automobiles as well as in Uncle Buck. However Uncle Buck’s a tad more psychopathic a character making for a fairly fun and very funny movie.
          The film’s centred on the Russell family who’ve recently moved from Indianapolis to Chicago (it’s a John Hughes movie, so where else?). But Cindy and her husband Bob find they have to go back after her father has a heart attack. Leaving on short notice they have no choice but to call Bob’s brother Buck who happens to live in the city, to look after the kids while they’re gone. Though Buck’s happy to oblige, he happens to be a lazy jobless bum with a smoking habit who’s constantly shying away from his girlfriend’s attempts at commitment. And so he has to bond with these kids to ingratiate himself to the family, which proves especially difficult when it comes to their resentful teenage daughter Tia. 
          This premise feels like a classic, to the point I’m racking my head to figure out where it was done earlier. Regardless, the film presents it in a very new way. Being a John Hughes film of the 80’s it’s got that family movie feel, while also having an edgy nature to its comedy. I very much appreciate the realistic context and though to some degree the child characters are archetypes they still come off as realistic kids, particularly Tia and her very complex relationship to authority figures. She’s frustrated and angry with the circumstances around her and holding her parents responsible is the easiest resolution. And so it makes Buck all the more infuriating when he’s not taking any of that shit. Hughes of course is experienced in writing good teenagers and that in addition to the acting really sells the character believably and sympathetically, in spite of her abrasive attitude. She’s also really mean to and unconcerned with her younger siblings, which is a trait you really don’t see often in films anymore, but is in fact a pretty legitimate kind of sibling relationship. 
          Uncle Buck himself is really enjoyable but also a little deranged, which I like. His battle of wills with Tia is great and even though she’s got the right idea some of the time, you always root for him to come out on top. And it’s really entertaining how he subtly threatens her boyfriend Bug. At one point after he goes pretty far, Bug threatens to sue, which he’s completely in his right to do. But toeing some criminal actions aside, Buck is fittingly the best part of the movie, and you can tell Candy’s having a blast. He gets to play both the kind father-figure while also a bit of a badass with words. And an electric screwdriver. The way he intimidates Bug and the school principal is really awesome and Candy’s definitely relishing these moments. Also, we get a couple speeches, and there’s something about John Candy speeches that’s always so potent. You really get the impression he means what he’s saying and the passion in his voice feels sincere. In terms of the rest of the cast Jean Louise Kelly is a stand-out, holding her own against Candy. As the younger kids, Gaby Hoffmann and Macaulay Caulkin (pre-Home Alone) are cute enough, even if their deliveries are off a number of times. Laurie Metcalf was very funny as next-door neighbour Marcie, and Amy Madigan is a surprise as Buck’s girlfriend Chanice, who’s tenuous relationship with him is actually interesting.
          Like many a John Hughes film, there’s some heart to Uncle Buck and Buck’s relationship with Chanice is one area it shows up in. But of course it’s Buck’s growing relationship with the kids that’s endearing. I kinda expected it to take a while before they warmed up to him, but the younger two liked him from fairly early on. I think that’s because Buck talks to them on their level and that’s his secret with Tia too, and why she’s annoyed by him. He’s not a typical authority figure and isn’t afraid to be blunt. Buck’s protectiveness of Tia is where the film shines. Even though he has been somewhat estranged from the family, they are still family, and he’s going to watch out for them. And it’s this side of his nature that makes Buck so likeable. I’m not going to spoil the climax even though it’s pretty obvious, but the resolution to Buck and Tia’s relationship is very nice. It doesn’t have the weight and power of similar scenes from Planes, Trains, & Automobiles, but it’s decent enough. 
          The best scenes of this movie are the really comical ones. The bit where Buck and Caulkin’s character engage in a rapid-fire questionnaire is really funny (both Candy and Caulkin are spot on in their timing) as are a bunch of Buck’s little scenes around the house, his various antics and vices. His giant pancake is really cool and his microwaving laundry is a fun kind of stupid. And then there’s the bit where Marcie walks in and hears what sounds like a very dirty scene going on in the next room. That’s something I admire about Hughes, is his tendency to in otherwise mostly family-friendly films, insert an incredibly raunchy kind of joke or two. The clown sequence is freaking terrific! As he’s proven on SCTV as well as here, Candy’s a master of funny dancing; his veiled threats to Bug have a twisted humour to them that you can’t help but laugh at. And of course there’s that fantastic shot of him with electric screwdriver in hand, cigar in his mouth and a crazed grin on his face that’s pure comedy gold!
          So while Uncle Buck on the surface seems like nothing that original or special, it is a surprisingly funny, heartfelt, and all-round enjoyable film. I can see why many think of it as quintessential John Candy because the character of Uncle Buck in terms of his values if not his actions, seems to mirror the kind of sweet guy Candy was. That being said this is a movie that could so easily be re-edited as a horror trailer (I’m sure someone’s already done it), but I encourage you to seek it out. It’s a really fun time, a movie I find I like more the more I think back on it, a great relic of the late 80’s and John Hughes, and definitely one of John Candy’s best!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Disney's Mulan, Cultural Appropriation, and Exploitation

I’m late on this one I know. I wasn’t willing to spend thirty bucks back in September for a movie experience I knew was going to be far poorer than if I had paid half that at a theatre. So I waited for it to hit streaming for free to give it a shot. In the meantime I heard that it wasn’t very good, but I remained determined not to skip it entirely, partly out of sympathy for director Niki Caro and partly out of morbid curiosity. Disney’s live-action Mulan  I was actually mildly looking forward to early in the year in spite of my well-documented distaste for this series of creative dead zones by the most powerful media conglomerate on earth. Mulan  was never one of Disney’s classics, a movie extremely of its time in its “girl power” gender politics and with a decidedly American take on ancient Chinese mythology. It got by on a couple good songs and a strong lead, but it was a movie that could be improved upon, and this new version looked like it had the potential to do that, em...

The Subtle Sensitivity of the Cinema of Wong Kar-wai

When I think of Wong Kar-wai, I think of nighttime and neon lights, I think of the image of lonely people sitting in cafes or bars as the world passes behind them, mere flashes of movement; I think of love and quiet, sombre heartbreak, the sensuality that exists between people but is rarely fully or openly expressed. Mostly I think of the mood of melancholy, yet how this can be beautiful, colourful, inspiring even. A feeling of gloominess at the complexity of messy human relationships, though tinged with an unmitigated joy in the sensation of that feeling. And a warmth, generated by light and colour, that cuts through to the solitude of our very soul. This isn’t a broadly definitive quality of Wong’s body of work -certainly it isn’t so much true of his martial arts films Ashes of Time  and The Grandmaster. But those most affectionate movies on my memory: Chungking Express , Fallen Angels , Happy Together , 2046 , of course  In the Mood for Love , and even My Blueberry Nig...

The Prince of Egypt: The Humanized Exodus

Moses and the story of the Exodus is one of the most influential mythologies of world history. It’s a centrepoint of the Abrahamic religions, and has directly influenced the society, culture, values, and laws of many civilizations. Not to mention, it’s a very powerful story, and one that unsurprisingly continues to resonate incredibly across the globe. In western culture, the story of Moses has been retold dozens of times in various mediums, most recognizably in the last century through film. And these adaptations have ranged from the iconic: Cecil B. DeMille’s The Ten Commandments;  to the infamous: Ridley Scott’s Exodus: Gods and Kings . But everyone seems to forget the one movie between those two that I’d argue has them both beat. As perhaps the best telling of one of the most influential stories of all time, I feel people don’t talk about The Prince of Egypt  nearly enough. The 1998 animated epic from DreamWorks is a breathtakingly stunning, concise but compelling, ...