Skip to main content

Where's the Craft in Warcraft?

Warcraft Teaser Poster.jpg
          High fantasy is a hard genre to get right, but it can be done well if it does one of two things. Like Lord of the Rings, it could present us with larger than life characters, but still tell a basic story (i.e. Good vs. Evil). Or like Game of Thrones, it could tell a complex story but ground it in a relatable world with identifiable characters. Warcraft does neither of these.
          Based on the mega-hit online game series, the story follows a horde of orcs travelling through a portal from their own wasted world into one governed by humans. But some of the orcs like Durotan (Toby Kebbel) a chieftain of his own tribe distrust their leader, who controls the portal with his mysterious magic. On the other side, the humans prepare to defend themselves, led by a soldier called Lothar (Travis Fimmel), the King (Dominic Cooper) and their own magical protector called the Guardian (Ben Foster). They’re assisted in their defence by a green half-orc called Garona (Paula Patton), and both races struggle to preserve the welfare of their own kind.
          Though I’m unfamiliar with the game and know next to nothing about World of Warcraft, it’s still clear this film is fiercely loyal to its source. Every design from the armour, the weapons, to the architecture of the cities and sometimes laughable orc voices is incredibly exaggerated as it looks in the game. The motion capture on the orcs is also really good, they often feel as much a part of a scene as the humans. Well as close as they can to the CGI-fest of an environment. Very little of the world is practical due to its reliance on replicating the game, which unfortunately gives the sets and the whole world of Azeroth little character. And because you don’t believe in the environments you can’t really get behind what the characters are fighting for. The characters are incredibly bland too, the audience never being privy to their personalities. They’re very much of their world which makes them hard to relate to and invest in. A few of them die during the course of the film, but you never care enough to feel anything for them. Ironically the most human character is Durotan the orc whose motivations and actions are best understood because we see the importance his society and his family have in his life. Actors like Fimmel and Foster though almost mail in their performances, detaching you from an already pretty detached plot.
          There are a lot of things going on in this movie that drive its story from political and cultural crossroads, to historical context, and of course magic. The trailers would have you believe this was going to be a film about a battle for land, the orcs simply needing a new home, and the humans defending their own. But there are other factors that complicate things and really shouldn’t have been there. Fantasy is hard enough to convey with its elaborate character names and rules, and since none of these characters or places have a recognizable context, the story should be streamlined and simple. That basic conflict with both sides having understandable goals could work. There’s another character played by Ben Schnetzer, a mage who gave up his apprenticeship, only to be set up as the next Guardian. I think the film would have been more interesting if he was made a focal point; if his character and journey was emphasized (with the orc war as the backdrop). We would invest more because of his insecurities, potential, and relatable drive.
          The Achilles heel of fantasy storytelling is magic, and Warcraft is a prime example of why magic should be downplayed in the genre (heck, in Game of Thrones it’s virtually non-existent). Without rules, it can be an easy deus ex machina or plot hole. The magic users in this film don’t have clear limitations of their power which creates this problem. And yet when the magic itself is explained it often becomes confusing. 
          The result of these uninteresting characters, conflict, and overly ambitious story is a film that’s visually decent but a slog to get through a lot of the time. Which is really a shame because it’s clear the writers and director are fans of this material. But they get in a bit over their head, and are also too reliant on this film getting a sequel, setting up a number of unanswered questions in the last act. Though better than some fantasy failures like Dungeons & Dragons and Eragon, it sadly doesn’t offer the general public anywhere near what it gives its already established fans.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Disney's Mulan, Cultural Appropriation, and Exploitation

I’m late on this one I know. I wasn’t willing to spend thirty bucks back in September for a movie experience I knew was going to be far poorer than if I had paid half that at a theatre. So I waited for it to hit streaming for free to give it a shot. In the meantime I heard that it wasn’t very good, but I remained determined not to skip it entirely, partly out of sympathy for director Niki Caro and partly out of morbid curiosity. Disney’s live-action Mulan  I was actually mildly looking forward to early in the year in spite of my well-documented distaste for this series of creative dead zones by the most powerful media conglomerate on earth. Mulan  was never one of Disney’s classics, a movie extremely of its time in its “girl power” gender politics and with a decidedly American take on ancient Chinese mythology. It got by on a couple good songs and a strong lead, but it was a movie that could be improved upon, and this new version looked like it had the potential to do that, emphasizing

The Hays Code was Bad, Sex in Movies is Good

Don't Look Now (1973) Will Hays, Who Knows About Sex In 1930, former Republican politician and chair of the Motion Picture Association of America Will Hayes introduced a series of self-censorship guidelines for the movie industry in response to a mixture of celebrity scandals and lobbying from the Catholic Church against various ‘immoralities’ creating a perception of Hollywood as corrupt and indecent. The Hays Code, or the Motion Picture Production Code, was formally adopted in 1930, though not stringently enforced until 1934 under the auspices of Joseph Breen. It laid out a careful list of what was and wasn’t acceptable for a film expecting major distribution. It stipulated rules against profanity, the depiction of miscegenation, and offensive portrayals of the clergy, but a lot of it was based around sexual content: “sexual perversion” of any kind was disallowed, as were any opaquely textual or visual allusions to reproduction, and right near the top “No licentious or suggestiv

Pixar Sundays: The Incredibles (2004)

          Brad Bird was already a master by the time he came to Pixar. Not only did he hone his craft as an early director on The Simpsons , but he directed a little animated film for Warner Bros. in 1999, that though not a box office success was loved by critics and quickly grew a cult following. The Iron Giant is now among many people’s favourite animated movies. Likewise, Bird’s feature debut at Pixar, The Incredibles , his own variation of a superhero movie, is often considered one of the studio’s best. And for very good reason, as the most talented director at Pixar shows.            Superheroes were once the world’s greatest crime-fighting force until several lawsuits for collateral damage (and in the case of Mr. Incredible, a hilarious suicide prevention), outlawed their vigilantism. Fifteen years later Mr. Incredible, now living as Bob Parr, has a family with his wife Helen, the former Elastigirl. But Bob, in a combination of mid-life crisis and nostalgia for the old day