Skip to main content

Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: Secret of the Ooze 2

  
        Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles is one of the strangest things to have lasting power. I have a good friend who remembers them nostalgically from childhood as do I, and we’re eight years apart! For such a bizarre idea, who’d have thought it would still be around today. But Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: Out of the Shadows is in theatres and everyone’s favourite pizza-eating foot-clan fighting mutants are back. They haven’t had more than one good feature film, and after this one, that’s still kinda the case.
          During a transfer between prisons, Shredder with the help of a mad scientist called Baxter Stockman manages to escape and Leonardo, Raphael, Donatello, and Michelangelo go after him.  Eventually they discover that not only has Stockman manufactured a substance that mutates humans (and could have reverse effects on the turtles), but two new mutants called Bebop and Rocksteady are gathering pieces of technology that will open a rift uniting Shredder with a powerful alien villain from another dimension called Krang. The turtles must stop them before Krang comes through and enslaves the world.
          What makes this movie enjoyable are the Turtles themselves! Whatever incarnation you’re familiar with, you’ll recognize these guys. You could argue their personalities are a little clichéd, but they always have been and this film delivers on them in fun ways. Raph is still abrasive, Leo’s insecure, Donny’s the geek, and Mikey’s got the jokes but here is also the dreamer it seems. Their interactions off each other are really good and you buy their brotherhood even if the conflict concerning that relationship has been seen before (how many times now have Raph and Leo been at odds?) They each get some good action sequences too, and I like how each have different feelings about being outsiders of society.
          This movie has plenty of fan service, but as cool as it can be to some, to others it’s pretty alienating. The double-edged sword of fan service is that a portion of your audience will always be unaware and in this case it’s not only the references that won’t connect or make sense to anyone unfamiliar with the series. The story is pretty poorly paced, some developments have no set-up and there are a bunch plot holes. You can’t quite settle into the situation because the film is attempting to appease so many fans by including Bebop and Rocksteady, Krang, and numerous other references that the story winds up being unfocussed. If one villain took centre stage like Krang or even Stockman it might have worked, but as is it’s too crowded. There is far too much exposition to relate a lot of the story points, to the point the film at times comes off as condescending. The ooze that may promise a better life for the Turtles is one of a few threads that’s really underdeveloped, and said climax feels way too uninspired and underwhelming, especially in how Shredder is insultingly sidelined. And this film also demonstrates that not everything from a cartoon translates well to film. It’s hard enough to buy Bebop and Rocksteady (who are okay, but have an irritating catchphrase) in this seemingly real world, but Krang in particular sticks out as impossible to take seriously in a live-action film. His scenes are often awkward. And the writing isn’t very good, to the degree even the Turtles suffer. A good chunk of Mikey’s jokes fall flat.
          And Megan Fox is still as bad as ever, only this time her April O’Neal is joined by Casey Jones played by Stephen Amell who’s only a little bit better. His character’s in the movie purely because Casey Jones should appear in a Ninja Turtles movie, and adds nothing to the plot. Tyler Perry is a little enjoyably corny as Baxter Stockman but he’s often just doing stereotypical nerd-mad scientist things that aren’t all that interesting despite his putting his all in. Laura Linney’s in the movie for some reason, desperately trying to take seriously a campy script, and for reasons unbeknownst to anyone, Will Arnett was invited back.
          I get the feeling though this film is aiming at a younger demographic. It’s target audience are kid,s and those nostalgic for the previous versions of the Turtles, particularly the original 1987 series. And those people will most likely be pleased. The personalities of the Turtles may win over non-fans but not much else in this film will. As a Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles movie, it’s not bad. As a movie overall though it may be like the ninja brothers themselves, best left in the shadows.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Strange History of the American Spoof Movie

Parody movies have been around for a lot longer than we tend to think of them. Even from the earliest days of Hollywood there were movies meant to satirize a particular subject or genre. In the silent era, Buster Keaton was responsible for a few. And in the early sound era, almost as soon as the monster pictures took off did you see comic versions of them -Abbott and Costello hosting a few. But parody movies tended to be subtle for most of cinema history, or parody came in conjunction with another goal of the comedy. It really wasn’t until the 1980s and 90s that it took off and became popularly understood. And there is perhaps a line to be drawn to the counterculture comedy explosion that began in the 1970s through avenues like  Saturday Night Live , which frequently parodied from even its earliest years popular movies and cultural properties of the time. But that is still a way’s back. To my generation though, ‘parody movie’ is perhaps a less known term than the more blunt ‘s...
Post a Comment
Read more

A Stylish and Charmingly Reinvented David Copperfield

The Personal History, Adventures, Experience and Observation of David Copperfield the Younger of Blunderstone Rookery (Which He Never Meant to Publish on Any Account)  is the most important book Charles Dickens ever wrote. It is not the most famous or influential by any means (that would of course be A Christmas Carol ), but it is the book that is the purest expression of the authors’ style, identity, and worldview. It is his most personal work, semi-autobiographical in its story of the chronology from infancy to adulthood of a character who overcomes great loss and hardships to find a fulfilling life as a writer. To read David Copperfield  is to understand Dickens himself. Armando Iannucci knew this when he decided to make a new adaptation of the novel for a twenty-first century audience. He also knew that Dickens adaptations are ubiquitous at this point. Films are a bit rarer, but every few years a new television adaptation rears its head to keep the authors’ unique world an...
Post a Comment
Read more

Notes on the Title Cards of The Lord of the Rings

It might be sacrilege for one who both considers The Lord of the Rings  trilogy to be one of the greatest triumphs of cinema and has been an avid lover of the films since adolescence, to declare that the original theatrical cuts of the films are better than the much beloved extended editions. Easily it’s my most controversial opinion regarding these movies. Don’t get me wrong, I do like the extended editions quite a lot, especially as someone who just enjoys spending time in that universe. They flesh it out more, add extra flavour, and in increasing the length by about an hour really emphasize the epic quality of these films. But I find that the original cuts are generally more cleanly paced, more seamlessly edited, and much more accessible to audiences. All the stuff there is to love about The Lord of the Rings  is there in the original versions, the plethora of new and extended scenes merely add to that for fans. And of those, they fall into three camps for me: 1....
1 comment
Read more