Skip to main content

Nice Job Nice Guys


          Just when you thought the buddy genre was dead and dated, something like The Nice Guys comes along to breathe new life into it. Writer and director Shane Black certainly knows what he’s doing when it comes to this genre, having basically created buddy cop movies as we know them as the writer of Lethal Weapon. This film however bears a lot more of a resemblance to his directorial debut Kiss Kiss Bang Bang in how it combines action and clichés typical of the genre with a sense of self aware humour and sharp writing. And though this film isn’t quite as solid as that one, it’s still a surprisingly good time!
          In 1977 Los Angeles, a freelance enforcer Jackson Healy (Russell Crowe) hires a deadbeat incompetent P.I. Holland March (Ryan Gosling) to help find a missing teenager whose disappearance seems to be linked to the recent death of a popular porn star. However their investigation makes them targets of among others a pair of hit-men played by Beau Knapp and the always awesome Keith David, signalling that a larger conspiracy is at work.
          This film does a really good job of immersing you in the time period. From the visual style of the environment and characters, to the frequent colour schemes, and especially the small details. Like when it shows a TV broadcast that’s very grainy or a headline about Richard Nixon. Not to mention ads for Jaws 2, and the likes of Richard Lewis and Tim Allen performing as newcomers at the Comedy Store.
          The story itself though a decent mystery is peppered with every cliché of the buddy cop genre. The pairing of opposite personalities, the troubled backstories, one character’s bad habits, multiple shoot-outs where the bad guys seem to have exceptionally poor aim, etc. There’s even lazy exposition, and character conveyed through voice over narration, which though not used a lot is still jarring because both characters provide it making for an inconsistent perspective. The plot itself however takes twists and turns, and while there are definitely story beats that feel derivative of Kiss Kiss Bang Bang such as a kidnapping, an accidental major injury, and a theme of sexual exploitation, it’s still original enough to hold its own.
          I think the main thing that allows The Nice Guys to overcome all its buddy movie tropes is its sense of humour. There are a lot of really good jokes and funny situations in this movie, coming mostly from the acting and writing. Gosling is very enjoyable in how inept his character is, while Crowe though not as funny, shows he can be a surprisingly decent comedy actor. Like in any good buddy movie, the chemistry between the leads is vital and these two are great together. They’re given a lot of good banter to work with though, the writing is superb. Again, Black knows this genre, and his tongue-in-cheek approach to the dialogue, characters, and the set-ups keeps the film constantly entertaining and the audience constantly engaged with the mystery. He knows what the audience expects with a scenario which makes it all the more thrilling when he does something interesting or funny with it. Many of the supporting actors like Knapp, David, Margaret Qualley, Matt Bomer, and Kim Basinger do a good job, but the particular stand-out is Angourie Rice as Holland’s meddling daughter Holly who pretty much becomes Penny Gadget, assisting in the investigation and often times proving herself more capable than her father. She stole a lot of her scenes, and I look forward to seeing her again if this becomes a series as the film clearly wants it to be.
          If you’ve been looking for an action-comedy that’s really fun and hasn’t been seen in a while, The Nice Guys certainly won’t disappoint. Of course any movie opening opposite the insanely puerile Angry Birds Movie is bound to be really good, but The Nice Guys certainly earns that seal of approval. If nothing else it’s very different next to all the bigger franchise movies this summer, and is a welcome and very fun reprieve from that usual summer fare.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Strange History of the American Spoof Movie

Parody movies have been around for a lot longer than we tend to think of them. Even from the earliest days of Hollywood there were movies meant to satirize a particular subject or genre. In the silent era, Buster Keaton was responsible for a few. And in the early sound era, almost as soon as the monster pictures took off did you see comic versions of them -Abbott and Costello hosting a few. But parody movies tended to be subtle for most of cinema history, or parody came in conjunction with another goal of the comedy. It really wasn’t until the 1980s and 90s that it took off and became popularly understood. And there is perhaps a line to be drawn to the counterculture comedy explosion that began in the 1970s through avenues like  Saturday Night Live , which frequently parodied from even its earliest years popular movies and cultural properties of the time. But that is still a way’s back. To my generation though, ‘parody movie’ is perhaps a less known term than the more blunt ‘s...

Notes on the Title Cards of The Lord of the Rings

It might be sacrilege for one who both considers The Lord of the Rings  trilogy to be one of the greatest triumphs of cinema and has been an avid lover of the films since adolescence, to declare that the original theatrical cuts of the films are better than the much beloved extended editions. Easily it’s my most controversial opinion regarding these movies. Don’t get me wrong, I do like the extended editions quite a lot, especially as someone who just enjoys spending time in that universe. They flesh it out more, add extra flavour, and in increasing the length by about an hour really emphasize the epic quality of these films. But I find that the original cuts are generally more cleanly paced, more seamlessly edited, and much more accessible to audiences. All the stuff there is to love about The Lord of the Rings  is there in the original versions, the plethora of new and extended scenes merely add to that for fans. And of those, they fall into three camps for me: 1....

Back to the Feature: New York, New York (1977)

New York, New York  is a two hour forty minute musical movie largely about a toxic relationship and I understand why it was Martin Scorsese’s first big flop. Some have blamed its poor reception on the kind of movie it was, of a style and tone Scorsese wasn’t known for, but I find that hard to believe. Even after only five films, he’d proven himself an extremely versatile director, and Alice Doesn’t Live Here Anymore  found an audience. Sure this jazz musical love letter to New York City was following up Taxi Driver and its’ far more cynical take on the city, but then it’s also ‘from the director of Taxi Driver ’ which itself was a big hit. Was it a matter of public appetite for musicals, or mere word of mouth and early critical reception that dissuaded viewers? Irrespective of that, I was stunned to discover this movie was the origin of the titular song, which I’d assumed was much older (it’s definitely got the sound of something that might have come out of the Jazz sce...