Skip to main content

Captain America's Civil War Goes Above and Beyond


          One of the things I admire most about Marvel is that though they have their audience in the palm of their hand and could put out just about anything at this point, they still instil a lot effort and attention into their films. There’s a dedication, integrity, and sense of responsibility that you can pick up on even in their lesser movies. And it’s incredibly clear how much of that went into Captain America: Civil War.
          It’s easy to say this second clash of superheroes of 2016 does what Batman v. Superman should have done, but Captain America: Civil War had a huge advantage: a combined seven films building the characters of Captain America and Iron Man. There’s a lot more investment in their ideologies, relationship, and conflict, and for the most part it pays off in spades.
          After a mission in Nigeria goes awry resulting in severe civilian casualties, Secretary of State Ross (William Hurt) imposes new legislation on the Avengers which would dictate their responsibilities and render them answerable to the U.N. Tony Stark (Robert Downey Jr.) is all for the plan to prevent further loss of life, but Steve Rogers (Chris Evans) believes they can trust their own judgement and that government intervention would be wrong. Matters are made more personal when a series of terror attacks are committed seemingly by Steve’s old friend Bucky Barnes (Sebastian Stan) and he makes the choice to protect him, turning against Tony and a number of other heroes.
          The conflict of this movie divides its two leads based on principle and that’s a very important thing. It’s that clash of viewpoints needed in a film of this magnitude and I like that for the most part it doesn’t play favourites. You may identify more with Captain America, but you can still understand Iron Man’s argument, or vice versa. Civil War illustrates the consequences that are often overlooked in superhero films. We were all so blown away by The Avengers and Winter Soldier that we didn’t consider how many innocents were lost while the world was being saved. Whether it’s a price worth paying is one of the central themes of this film.
          That being said, there’s also a personal story taking place, as Cap tries to prove the innocence of his best friend. Even though we know he’s been controlled Manchurian Candidate-style and most of the film is seen through his and Cap’s eyes, it’s hard to ignore how much of a weapon of villains he’s become. And Sebastian Stan really pulls it off standing out among such a large cast. Chris Evans is still surprisingly enjoyable as Captain America while playing Iron Man well has just become second nature to Robert Downey Jr. Scarlett Johansson and Anthony Mackie are really good too; Daniel Bruhl though his villain character is pointless, he plays the part fairly well. Chadwick Boseman is introduced in this film as Black Panther, an African prince with a personal vendetta against Bucky’s Winter Soldier, and he’s incredibly engaging. And though he isn’t in it much Paul Rudd steals every scene as Ant-Man becoming easily one of my favourites, as does Tom Holland who gets surprisingly more than a small cameo as the new Spider-Man!
          The best sequence by far is when the two teams have their big battle. Yeah it doesn’t make sense that everyone would be quipping while trying to beat each other up, but the action, dialogue, and personalities working off each other is enormously fun! And the film still sustains its seriousness, the gravity behind every character’s choices, and it’s important themes.
          However with a name like Captain America: Civil War, there is a suggestion of something really grand. And while the film captured that thematically and emotionally, I don’t think it did so visually. That’s not to say it didn’t deliver (the action choreography is amazing), it just doesn’t feel quite as big as maybe it should. Then again this is a Captain America movie first. I wish we got a little more of the political reasons behind the two adversaries’ values; like a reference to Cap’s first hand familiarity with the Jewish registration of Nazi Germany, or Iron Man’s close experience with unmaintained power.
          Nonetheless, Captain America: Civil War is pretty terrific! It’s certainly one of Marvel’s best three (better even than both Avengers films). It’s clear directors Joe and Anthony Russo know these characters and this world well. Some would say we’re over-saturated with superhero movies lately, which may be true, but as long as movies like this one exist, I don’t think we’ll tire for a while yet!
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Strange History of the American Spoof Movie

Parody movies have been around for a lot longer than we tend to think of them. Even from the earliest days of Hollywood there were movies meant to satirize a particular subject or genre. In the silent era, Buster Keaton was responsible for a few. And in the early sound era, almost as soon as the monster pictures took off did you see comic versions of them -Abbott and Costello hosting a few. But parody movies tended to be subtle for most of cinema history, or parody came in conjunction with another goal of the comedy. It really wasn’t until the 1980s and 90s that it took off and became popularly understood. And there is perhaps a line to be drawn to the counterculture comedy explosion that began in the 1970s through avenues like  Saturday Night Live , which frequently parodied from even its earliest years popular movies and cultural properties of the time. But that is still a way’s back. To my generation though, ‘parody movie’ is perhaps a less known term than the more blunt ‘s...
Post a Comment
Read more

Notes on the Title Cards of The Lord of the Rings

It might be sacrilege for one who both considers The Lord of the Rings  trilogy to be one of the greatest triumphs of cinema and has been an avid lover of the films since adolescence, to declare that the original theatrical cuts of the films are better than the much beloved extended editions. Easily it’s my most controversial opinion regarding these movies. Don’t get me wrong, I do like the extended editions quite a lot, especially as someone who just enjoys spending time in that universe. They flesh it out more, add extra flavour, and in increasing the length by about an hour really emphasize the epic quality of these films. But I find that the original cuts are generally more cleanly paced, more seamlessly edited, and much more accessible to audiences. All the stuff there is to love about The Lord of the Rings  is there in the original versions, the plethora of new and extended scenes merely add to that for fans. And of those, they fall into three camps for me: 1....
1 comment
Read more

Back to the Feature: New York, New York (1977)

New York, New York  is a two hour forty minute musical movie largely about a toxic relationship and I understand why it was Martin Scorsese’s first big flop. Some have blamed its poor reception on the kind of movie it was, of a style and tone Scorsese wasn’t known for, but I find that hard to believe. Even after only five films, he’d proven himself an extremely versatile director, and Alice Doesn’t Live Here Anymore  found an audience. Sure this jazz musical love letter to New York City was following up Taxi Driver and its’ far more cynical take on the city, but then it’s also ‘from the director of Taxi Driver ’ which itself was a big hit. Was it a matter of public appetite for musicals, or mere word of mouth and early critical reception that dissuaded viewers? Irrespective of that, I was stunned to discover this movie was the origin of the titular song, which I’d assumed was much older (it’s definitely got the sound of something that might have come out of the Jazz sce...
Post a Comment
Read more