Skip to main content

Penny Dreadful Reviews!


          Victorian and Gothic literature has produced some of the most fascinating and well-known characters in all of fiction. Some are classics of monster media like Bram Stoker’s Dracula and Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein’s monster, but there are other greats like Oscar Wilde’s Dorian Gray, Charlotte Bronte’s Jane Eyre, Robert Louis Stevenson’s Dr. Jekyll (and Mr. Hyde) and of course Arthur Conan Doyle’s Sherlock Holmes. They’re all very compelling in their own stories, imagine if they were to meet and interact.
          When I was a kid I read novels especially from this era as opposed to something more typical like comic books. And so, something like The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen was MY Avengers. I never got around to reading it then, but the idea of a bunch of my favourite literary characters coming together as a kind of superhero team was incredibly alluring. Even though their movie was shit, I’m very excited for the upcoming reboot. But it’s come to my attention there’s a series on Showtime offering something in a similar vein. Though with a particular focus on horror.
          Penny Dreadful created by John Logan and produced by Sam Mendes I’ve heard rumblings of for a while and though it’s not a super hit, everything I’ve heard has been positive. From what I understand, it follows a number of famous nineteenth century Gothic characters inhabiting the same world while dealing with supernatural threats and developments. And that premise intrigues me incredibly. It also helps that this show has the perfect title: penny dreadfuls being pulp fictions of the Victorian period noted for their sensational levels of violence, sex, and most of all horror. It gives a perfect impression of the tone of this show. And I look forward to seeing if it’s justified.
          Yes, I’m going to be doing episode reviews of Penny Dreadful. It’s a series that interests me enough to do a blog series on. Now unlike my Disney Sundays or Doctor Who reviews, these may not be every week. They might be slightly more frequently or slightly less considering the first two seasons are already released. But I’ll try to do them fairly regularly. While I’m at it I might as well say I also intend to do by the week episode reviews of the new season of Game of Thrones once it premiers. There’s some good TV out there that’s just as good and in some cases better than movies, and I’d like to critique and discuss them.
          For a start, let’s see what terrors and adventures await in Penny Dreadful!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Strange History of the American Spoof Movie

Parody movies have been around for a lot longer than we tend to think of them. Even from the earliest days of Hollywood there were movies meant to satirize a particular subject or genre. In the silent era, Buster Keaton was responsible for a few. And in the early sound era, almost as soon as the monster pictures took off did you see comic versions of them -Abbott and Costello hosting a few. But parody movies tended to be subtle for most of cinema history, or parody came in conjunction with another goal of the comedy. It really wasn’t until the 1980s and 90s that it took off and became popularly understood. And there is perhaps a line to be drawn to the counterculture comedy explosion that began in the 1970s through avenues like  Saturday Night Live , which frequently parodied from even its earliest years popular movies and cultural properties of the time. But that is still a way’s back. To my generation though, ‘parody movie’ is perhaps a less known term than the more blunt ‘s...

Notes on the Title Cards of The Lord of the Rings

It might be sacrilege for one who both considers The Lord of the Rings  trilogy to be one of the greatest triumphs of cinema and has been an avid lover of the films since adolescence, to declare that the original theatrical cuts of the films are better than the much beloved extended editions. Easily it’s my most controversial opinion regarding these movies. Don’t get me wrong, I do like the extended editions quite a lot, especially as someone who just enjoys spending time in that universe. They flesh it out more, add extra flavour, and in increasing the length by about an hour really emphasize the epic quality of these films. But I find that the original cuts are generally more cleanly paced, more seamlessly edited, and much more accessible to audiences. All the stuff there is to love about The Lord of the Rings  is there in the original versions, the plethora of new and extended scenes merely add to that for fans. And of those, they fall into three camps for me: 1....

Back to the Feature: New York, New York (1977)

New York, New York  is a two hour forty minute musical movie largely about a toxic relationship and I understand why it was Martin Scorsese’s first big flop. Some have blamed its poor reception on the kind of movie it was, of a style and tone Scorsese wasn’t known for, but I find that hard to believe. Even after only five films, he’d proven himself an extremely versatile director, and Alice Doesn’t Live Here Anymore  found an audience. Sure this jazz musical love letter to New York City was following up Taxi Driver and its’ far more cynical take on the city, but then it’s also ‘from the director of Taxi Driver ’ which itself was a big hit. Was it a matter of public appetite for musicals, or mere word of mouth and early critical reception that dissuaded viewers? Irrespective of that, I was stunned to discover this movie was the origin of the titular song, which I’d assumed was much older (it’s definitely got the sound of something that might have come out of the Jazz sce...