Skip to main content

Penny Dreadful Reviews: "Night Work"


         “Night Work” is the first episode of Penny Dreadful and it definitely gets off to a good start. It doesn’t introduce all of its characters or establish its world impeccably, but it sets up the premise as well as what looks like the arc of this season and its tone terrifically. It seems to know its audience and drops the literary connections very strategically. That in addition to some good action sequences, suspense, and great performances make it stand out. As far as pilots go, it doesn’t quite grip me the way something like Game of Thrones and Boardwalk Empire did, but certainly leaves me curious as to what’s to come.
          Despite the various periods its characters originate from, the series seems centred in the late Victorian period (judging by a Jack the Ripper reference, about the 1890s) which is better suited for the gritty, dark, and dirty English atmosphere. After a classy opening of a woman being abducted while taking a shit, we’re introduced to the mysterious Vanessa Ives who recruits American frontier performer and sharpshooter Ethan Chandler for a special operation. That operation being to assist her and Sir Malcolm Murray in taking out a vampire and his minions who are connected with the being who kidnapped Malcolm’s daughter. They also enlist a young scientist with supernatural interests to learn more about these creatures, who by the end of the episode is revealed to be Victor Frankenstein himself.
          The cast they got for this show is really exceptional! Timothy Dalton adds credibility and some classic British gravitas, but there’s also heavy-hitters in Eva Green and Simon Russell Beale. Harry Treadaway is also great, giving this iteration of Frankenstein a disturbing presence. And Josh Hartnett is fine -I’ve never found him that great an actor but he’s decent enough in this as the audience’s eyes into the story. It helps being surrounded by such talent playing interesting characters. And these characters really are interesting being perhaps the show’s best feature so far. Frankenstein is captivating in his creepiness and obsession. In one of the episode’s best scenes he talks with Sir Malcolm about how other scientists seek discovery for their own gain, while he is concerned only with breaching the barrier between life and death. You believe he’s legitimately mad in a way many versions of Frankenstein aren’t (except perhaps Gene Wilder). Vanessa and Sir Malcolm are shrouded in intrigue and mystery. Vanessa in particular has some connection with supernatural forces almost like a possession (oh and Eva Green does a surprisingly good English accent). And I like how the show also establishes that these are morally inconsiderate characters. In recruiting Chandler and Frankenstein both Vanessa and Sir Malcolm asked “does it matter?” or “do you care?” in response to inquiries whether joining them would require committing serious crimes like murder. Sir Malcolm especially, talks of murdering the world to get his daughter back. It makes you realize that even though these are our protagonists, they’re very dark characters, capable perhaps of being just as dangerous as the creatures they’re hunting. Except perhaps Chandler.
          The literary connections make for some good speculation but also are used so that they don’t require the audience be familiar with the source. Yeah it’s fairly obvious who Treadaway’s character is before the revelation at the episode’s end (the term “resurrectionist” applied to him is really a giveaway), but the connection of Sir Malcolm and who he’s hunting isn’t quite as apparent. Those who know the story of Dracula like myself though can pick up on the fact that he’s the father of famed victim Mina Harker, and through that detail that Dracula is indeed the creature they’re looking for. But the show doesn’t feel like they need to be blatant about it. It’s clear John Logan is writing it more focussed on the characters, the tension, and the drama, and drawing from the literary sources comes second. That being said I’m glad it’s gradually setting up future characters and conflicts. Even if you suspect where it’s going your curiosity can’t help but be piqued by Vanessa’s hallucinations or the discovery that the markings beneath the vampire’s skin originate from the Egyptian book of the dead (wouldn’t it be weirdly awesome if Ash from The Evil Dead made an appearance?)
          The horror element is there as well, though subdued a little for this first episode. This show is plenty violent.as we see in the first big action sequence where a vampire and his minions (one of whom is Nosferatu!) take on the trio. There’s also a gruesome bloody alleyway full of vampire victims with one bearing the signature holes in the neck of Dracula. And the designs of the vampire and Frankenstein’s monster are pretty striking and horrific. But even in the less bloody sequences, the show knows what it’s doing in creating terror. I love the background-figure-scare in horror, and we get a couple instances of that here, where we’re caught off guard for a second by a sudden person in the back of a shot. Though the scares aren’t huge in this episode (the opening was also predictable) it promises more and better in the future.
          But Penny Dreadful may be more of a thriller than horror series anyway, based on how important the period setting and character drama is. I’m very interested to see where it goes. There are more characters to meet -both Billie Piper and Rory Kinnear are listed in the opening credits but don’t appear. I want to know who they’re playing and how they’ll fit in with the ensemble being built. This certainly isn’t League of Extraordinary Gentlemen so not all of these characters will be recognized figures but I’m willing to bet a few are. Overall “Night Work” was a pretty solid first episode with a lot of promise. I’m invested in where this story goes and who these characters are, and just what this world has waiting for us. Sir Malcolm tells Frankenstein there are “at least two” vampires in the world. Knowing there’s likely more, I’m beyond curious what other terrifying creatures they’re destined to come across.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Disney's Mulan, Cultural Appropriation, and Exploitation

I’m late on this one I know. I wasn’t willing to spend thirty bucks back in September for a movie experience I knew was going to be far poorer than if I had paid half that at a theatre. So I waited for it to hit streaming for free to give it a shot. In the meantime I heard that it wasn’t very good, but I remained determined not to skip it entirely, partly out of sympathy for director Niki Caro and partly out of morbid curiosity. Disney’s live-action Mulan  I was actually mildly looking forward to early in the year in spite of my well-documented distaste for this series of creative dead zones by the most powerful media conglomerate on earth. Mulan  was never one of Disney’s classics, a movie extremely of its time in its “girl power” gender politics and with a decidedly American take on ancient Chinese mythology. It got by on a couple good songs and a strong lead, but it was a movie that could be improved upon, and this new version looked like it had the potential to do that, emphasizing

The Hays Code was Bad, Sex in Movies is Good

Don't Look Now (1973) Will Hays, Who Knows About Sex In 1930, former Republican politician and chair of the Motion Picture Association of America Will Hayes introduced a series of self-censorship guidelines for the movie industry in response to a mixture of celebrity scandals and lobbying from the Catholic Church against various ‘immoralities’ creating a perception of Hollywood as corrupt and indecent. The Hays Code, or the Motion Picture Production Code, was formally adopted in 1930, though not stringently enforced until 1934 under the auspices of Joseph Breen. It laid out a careful list of what was and wasn’t acceptable for a film expecting major distribution. It stipulated rules against profanity, the depiction of miscegenation, and offensive portrayals of the clergy, but a lot of it was based around sexual content: “sexual perversion” of any kind was disallowed, as were any opaquely textual or visual allusions to reproduction, and right near the top “No licentious or suggestiv

Pixar Sundays: The Incredibles (2004)

          Brad Bird was already a master by the time he came to Pixar. Not only did he hone his craft as an early director on The Simpsons , but he directed a little animated film for Warner Bros. in 1999, that though not a box office success was loved by critics and quickly grew a cult following. The Iron Giant is now among many people’s favourite animated movies. Likewise, Bird’s feature debut at Pixar, The Incredibles , his own variation of a superhero movie, is often considered one of the studio’s best. And for very good reason, as the most talented director at Pixar shows.            Superheroes were once the world’s greatest crime-fighting force until several lawsuits for collateral damage (and in the case of Mr. Incredible, a hilarious suicide prevention), outlawed their vigilantism. Fifteen years later Mr. Incredible, now living as Bob Parr, has a family with his wife Helen, the former Elastigirl. But Bob, in a combination of mid-life crisis and nostalgia for the old day