Skip to main content

The Legend of the Dragon Warrior Concludes


A series with a name like Kung Fu Panda really shouldn’t be a success. But the hard effort DreamWorks put in to enrich the world, story, and characters made it one of the best animated film series of the past decade! Each film is great on its own, but they’ve built on one another and on the character of Po. Kung Fu Panda 3 concludes his story and does so in the best way possible.
Kai (J.K. Simmons) a great warrior, has left the spirit world with the goal of attaining the chi of all the world’s kung fu masters and specifically, he’s coming for the Dragon Warrior a.k.a Po (Jack Black) protector of the Valley of Peace, who’s just been appointed by Master Shifu (Dustin Hoffman) to be the new teacher of the Furious Five. At the same time, Po’s long-lost father Li (Bryan Cranston) arrives having been sent to seek out his son. Upon discovering that Kai can only be defeated by a master of chi and that pandas were once such ancient masters, Po returns with Li to a secret panda village to master chi, learn about his people and himself.
Each film in this franchise has had a particular arc for Po: mastering kung fu, finding inner peace, and now mastering chi. But alongside all that has been a greater arc of learning who he is and developing as a character. While it’s very much the traditional hero’s journey, Po is not a traditional hero, but his enthusiasm, dedication, and courage makes his journey so much more endearing. The series has always had a profound influence of East Asian philosophy and morals, and it really shows best in this film. Chi, which is an essential principle in martial arts and Chinese spirituality, is characterized here as both a life force and a representation of Po’s final understanding of who he is. And the trials he goes through to achieve it and finish his journey are remarkable, and why these movies are so good. It’s something that though not mentioned much in the other films, feels they were building toward. And that’s pretty awesome.
Kung Fu Panda 3 brings back the regular cast. In addition to Black and Hoffman, Angelina Jolie, Jackie Chan, Seth Rogen, David Cross, and Lucy Liu return as the Furious Five, but also James Hong as Po’s adoptive father Mr. Ping and Randall Duk Kim as Grand Master Oogway, both of whom are very welcome. Kim just brings a natural wisdom to the part and Hong is wonderfully funny. As to the new cast, Cranston is pretty good, but Simmons is terrific. He’s an accomplished actor both in live-action and voice work and delivers the most on every line! The character relationships are still as gold as ever, particularly between Po and Shifu, and Po and Tigress. And the new relationship between Po and his father is very heart-warming. There’s an important theme of family to this movie and it’s really solid.
The animation is breathtakingly beautiful. Kung Fu Panda was the first movie that convinced me there was beauty in 3D animation, and the imagery in this film is some of the richest I’ve ever seen. Every setting is just oozing with a radiant atmosphere that really does take you back to ancient China. And this series still has the best fight choreography ever in animated film, being fast, thrilling, and absolutely captivating, leaving you glued to every movement.
There are a few shortcomings to the movie though. Like there’s a character voiced by Kate Hudson who doesn’t do anything and really didn’t need to be there. And of course with the introduction of baby pandas comes way too many moments of forced cuteness.
But regardless of that, Kung Fu Panda 3 is a resounding success. It may be the best of an already tremendous series! It's exhilarating, engrossing, atmospheric, and funny! But it's also deep in its themes, characters, and Asian philosophy, is outstandingly beautiful and stunningly kinetic in its visuals! And in short, is a perfect final chapter in a series no one thought a decade ago would be one of the best in animation!
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Strange History of the American Spoof Movie

Parody movies have been around for a lot longer than we tend to think of them. Even from the earliest days of Hollywood there were movies meant to satirize a particular subject or genre. In the silent era, Buster Keaton was responsible for a few. And in the early sound era, almost as soon as the monster pictures took off did you see comic versions of them -Abbott and Costello hosting a few. But parody movies tended to be subtle for most of cinema history, or parody came in conjunction with another goal of the comedy. It really wasn’t until the 1980s and 90s that it took off and became popularly understood. And there is perhaps a line to be drawn to the counterculture comedy explosion that began in the 1970s through avenues like  Saturday Night Live , which frequently parodied from even its earliest years popular movies and cultural properties of the time. But that is still a way’s back. To my generation though, ‘parody movie’ is perhaps a less known term than the more blunt ‘s...
Post a Comment
Read more

Notes on the Title Cards of The Lord of the Rings

It might be sacrilege for one who both considers The Lord of the Rings  trilogy to be one of the greatest triumphs of cinema and has been an avid lover of the films since adolescence, to declare that the original theatrical cuts of the films are better than the much beloved extended editions. Easily it’s my most controversial opinion regarding these movies. Don’t get me wrong, I do like the extended editions quite a lot, especially as someone who just enjoys spending time in that universe. They flesh it out more, add extra flavour, and in increasing the length by about an hour really emphasize the epic quality of these films. But I find that the original cuts are generally more cleanly paced, more seamlessly edited, and much more accessible to audiences. All the stuff there is to love about The Lord of the Rings  is there in the original versions, the plethora of new and extended scenes merely add to that for fans. And of those, they fall into three camps for me: 1....
1 comment
Read more

Back to the Feature: New York, New York (1977)

New York, New York  is a two hour forty minute musical movie largely about a toxic relationship and I understand why it was Martin Scorsese’s first big flop. Some have blamed its poor reception on the kind of movie it was, of a style and tone Scorsese wasn’t known for, but I find that hard to believe. Even after only five films, he’d proven himself an extremely versatile director, and Alice Doesn’t Live Here Anymore  found an audience. Sure this jazz musical love letter to New York City was following up Taxi Driver and its’ far more cynical take on the city, but then it’s also ‘from the director of Taxi Driver ’ which itself was a big hit. Was it a matter of public appetite for musicals, or mere word of mouth and early critical reception that dissuaded viewers? Irrespective of that, I was stunned to discover this movie was the origin of the titular song, which I’d assumed was much older (it’s definitely got the sound of something that might have come out of the Jazz sce...
Post a Comment
Read more