Skip to main content

Are You Watching Deadpool or is Deadpool Watching You?


         In 2009, comic book fans were excited for the appearance of Marvel favourite Deadpool in X-Men Origins: Wolverine. They even got massive Deadpool fan Ryan Reynolds to play the character. Then they saw the movie and quickly wanted a refund; among other reasons for the fact that they got everything about Deadpool wrong. And maybe no one was more upset than Ryan Reynolds himself.
          The fact that 20th Century Fox gave Reynolds another chance to play this character was more than generous. As was the decision to completely reboot the idea of Deadpool for his own feature. And with Reynolds getting more creative control of the character, as well as the film being granted an R rating to better reflect the tone of the comic, and an amazingly impressive marketing campaign including online holiday videos, a cancer PSA, and even a TV spot for The Bachelor, the hype for this film was growing. And now finally Deadpool has arrived, but is it good?
          Wade Wilson is a Canadian (nice!) mercenary who contracts terminal cancer, and in an effort to be cured of it undergoes an operation that to his shock, mutates his cancer to the point that he is permanently disfigured, but has the power to heal himself of any injury. During the process he undergoes severe torture by a scientist who calls himself Ajax but who Wilson tauntingly addresses by his real name Francis. Escaping, Wilson becomes the anti-hero Deadpool and sets on a mission to kill Francis before he can unleash this experiment on anyone else, least of all Wilson’s lover Vanessa.
          The story is very standard in fact in the last act strikingly so to the point that you’d see similar plots in old Superman serials. It’s a pretty general origin story and the beats that play out are easy enough to predict. What drives the film is the Deadpool character who in a word, is fun. Not likeable, but fun to watch in his antics. Reynolds is clearly grateful for this second chance and gives the character an attitude and sense of humour that’s instantly memorable. The supporting cast consists of Morena Baccarin, Ed Skrein, and T.J. Miller who are all fine but leave almost no impression next to the film’s title personality.
          Another thing that drives this film is the comedy. One of Deadpool’s gimmicks apart from his dark sense of humour and profanity, is the fact that he often breaks the fourth wall (i.e. he addresses the audience directly). And a lot of these jokes work and fit perfectly with the character and tone of the film. But they’re not the best I’ve seen in a movie. What Deadpool has over other comedies that break the fourth wall though is the volume of this kind of humour and variance, with meta jokes popping up in the most unlikely places. This movie may have had the funniest opening title sequence I’ve seen since The Naked Gun. Still I actually preferred the meta pop cultural comedy, and the shots taken at superhero movies. Deadpool not only takes aims at his previous cinematic incarnation, but also Reynolds’ superhero disaster Green Lantern, and even Reynolds himself. Though some jokes and plot points come at the behest of story and character consistency. For every reference to the multiple Professor Xaviers or noting of the fact that only two minor X-Men appear (Colossus and the ridiculously named Negasonic Teenage Warhead), there’s a “hero” joining Deadpool’s vendetta despite having opposing principles. There were also a couple moments where other characters made meta jokes which I felt should have been just Deadpool’s thing. And while the comedy was overall good, it didn’t balance the seriousness as well as it should have. It’s hard to invest in Deadpool having a tender moment with Vanessa after we’ve just seen him make a snappy remark while killing a guy.
          Still though flawed, Deadpool is nothing if not entertaining. I don’t know much about the comics but I think fans for sure will be satisfied (at the very least he doesn’t have his mouth sewn shut!). It’s got moments of sloppiness, but it’s fun and funny; a summer movie in February, and definitely worth seeing.
          Unless your thirteen years old. It’s rated R, and complaining about it is not going to change anything!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Disney's Mulan, Cultural Appropriation, and Exploitation

I’m late on this one I know. I wasn’t willing to spend thirty bucks back in September for a movie experience I knew was going to be far poorer than if I had paid half that at a theatre. So I waited for it to hit streaming for free to give it a shot. In the meantime I heard that it wasn’t very good, but I remained determined not to skip it entirely, partly out of sympathy for director Niki Caro and partly out of morbid curiosity. Disney’s live-action Mulan  I was actually mildly looking forward to early in the year in spite of my well-documented distaste for this series of creative dead zones by the most powerful media conglomerate on earth. Mulan  was never one of Disney’s classics, a movie extremely of its time in its “girl power” gender politics and with a decidedly American take on ancient Chinese mythology. It got by on a couple good songs and a strong lead, but it was a movie that could be improved upon, and this new version looked like it had the potential to do that, emphasizing

The Hays Code was Bad, Sex in Movies is Good

Don't Look Now (1973) Will Hays, Who Knows About Sex In 1930, former Republican politician and chair of the Motion Picture Association of America Will Hayes introduced a series of self-censorship guidelines for the movie industry in response to a mixture of celebrity scandals and lobbying from the Catholic Church against various ‘immoralities’ creating a perception of Hollywood as corrupt and indecent. The Hays Code, or the Motion Picture Production Code, was formally adopted in 1930, though not stringently enforced until 1934 under the auspices of Joseph Breen. It laid out a careful list of what was and wasn’t acceptable for a film expecting major distribution. It stipulated rules against profanity, the depiction of miscegenation, and offensive portrayals of the clergy, but a lot of it was based around sexual content: “sexual perversion” of any kind was disallowed, as were any opaquely textual or visual allusions to reproduction, and right near the top “No licentious or suggestiv

Pixar Sundays: The Incredibles (2004)

          Brad Bird was already a master by the time he came to Pixar. Not only did he hone his craft as an early director on The Simpsons , but he directed a little animated film for Warner Bros. in 1999, that though not a box office success was loved by critics and quickly grew a cult following. The Iron Giant is now among many people’s favourite animated movies. Likewise, Bird’s feature debut at Pixar, The Incredibles , his own variation of a superhero movie, is often considered one of the studio’s best. And for very good reason, as the most talented director at Pixar shows.            Superheroes were once the world’s greatest crime-fighting force until several lawsuits for collateral damage (and in the case of Mr. Incredible, a hilarious suicide prevention), outlawed their vigilantism. Fifteen years later Mr. Incredible, now living as Bob Parr, has a family with his wife Helen, the former Elastigirl. But Bob, in a combination of mid-life crisis and nostalgia for the old day