Skip to main content

Doctor Who by Steven Moffat (2010-2017)

Steven Moffat’s tenure as Doctor Who showrunner is coming to an end. And that’s not a threat or moan about how awful he is or anything. It’s actually been announced that the next series of Doctor Who is going to be his last. But determined to go out with a bang like Russell T. Davies, the next series has been pushed to 2017. We have a Christmas special to look forward to in eleven months, but a new series won’t air until over a year from now. That sucks! Since Moffat took over, the regularity of the Doctor Who series’ and specials have fluctuated and I just wish they’d pick a time and stick with it. During Davies’ era, every series began around March/April. But maybe they just pushed it back so that Moffat could end his run having been showrunner for five series spread over eight years.
But yeah, Moffat’s stepping down at long last. I’ve never been an extreme Moffat hater or thought he’s grown incapable of writing Doctor Who well. Hell, “Heaven Sent” this past series was written by him and is easily the best episode in years. But I do think he’s outstayed his welcome as showrunner. For a couple years now, the series has been in need of a refresh, especially with the arrival of Peter Capaldi as a very different Doctor than fans of the revived series are used to. And kudos to him for doing so. I don’t believe he’s tiring of it, he is after all a huge Doctor Who fan, and whatever you say about him, his enthusiasm for the show can’t be denied. I think he just realized that Doctor Who needed new blood and is actually doing what’s best for the show. Unless the next series is atrocious, he’s left in time to avoid becoming another John Nathan-Turner. And he’s leaving the series in capable hands.
Though I thought Mark Gatiss might be a natural choice for the next showrunner, Chris Chibnall was one of the runners-up and is certainly far from a poor replacement. His Doctor Who episodes like “42” and “Dinosaurs on a Spaceship” haven’t been all that impressive (I personally preferred his work on Torchwood). But it is interesting, while Steven Moffat was fantastic when just a writer on Doctor Who, he went on to become only a hit-or-miss showrunner. Chris Chibnall has been a hit-or-miss writer who’s gone on to become a fantastic showrunner. If you haven’t seen Broadchurch, I highly recommend it. The series about the investigation into the murder of a child in a small town and the effects it has on the community is tremendous. It features a number of Doctor Who stars as well, including Arthur Darvill, David Bradley, Eve Myles, and in the leading roles David Tennant and Olivia Coleman. Chibnall’s written every episode and his creative control has really paid off, showing how good he is at running a series. Now Broadchurch though popular in the U.K. isn’t near as mammoth a series as Doctor Who would be to undertake. But I think he’s up for the task. He does have experience in the universe of Doctor Who.  The only question would be, can he adapt for a more family oriented show? His best work, whether it be Broadchurch or Torchwood or Life on Mars, has been adult-oriented and he really writes that well. The trick is for him to tone it down on Doctor Who just the right amount. So that it can still have that wide appeal for all generations but still be able to take darker, mature risks in terms of characters and story. Maybe it will work out, maybe it won’t, but I’m still excited to see what Chris Chibnall will do. And I can’t wait to see what Peter Capaldi will be able to bring to the Doctor under him.
And you know what, if Moffat wants to write a one-off once in a while, I’m okay with that. He was always at his best when he didn’t have complete creative control (or in the case of Sherlock, sharing it with Mark Gatiss). I’ve always thought he was a better writer on Sherlock anyway, and now may be able to focus on that show more. We may even get more than three episodes every two years! But as for Doctor Who, good luck Chris Chibnall! Adiós Steven Moffat! If nothing else, your run was unique! And fuck you, whoever decided to put Doctor Who off until 2017!
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Strange History of the American Spoof Movie

Parody movies have been around for a lot longer than we tend to think of them. Even from the earliest days of Hollywood there were movies meant to satirize a particular subject or genre. In the silent era, Buster Keaton was responsible for a few. And in the early sound era, almost as soon as the monster pictures took off did you see comic versions of them -Abbott and Costello hosting a few. But parody movies tended to be subtle for most of cinema history, or parody came in conjunction with another goal of the comedy. It really wasn’t until the 1980s and 90s that it took off and became popularly understood. And there is perhaps a line to be drawn to the counterculture comedy explosion that began in the 1970s through avenues like  Saturday Night Live , which frequently parodied from even its earliest years popular movies and cultural properties of the time. But that is still a way’s back. To my generation though, ‘parody movie’ is perhaps a less known term than the more blunt ‘s...
Post a Comment
Read more

Notes on the Title Cards of The Lord of the Rings

It might be sacrilege for one who both considers The Lord of the Rings  trilogy to be one of the greatest triumphs of cinema and has been an avid lover of the films since adolescence, to declare that the original theatrical cuts of the films are better than the much beloved extended editions. Easily it’s my most controversial opinion regarding these movies. Don’t get me wrong, I do like the extended editions quite a lot, especially as someone who just enjoys spending time in that universe. They flesh it out more, add extra flavour, and in increasing the length by about an hour really emphasize the epic quality of these films. But I find that the original cuts are generally more cleanly paced, more seamlessly edited, and much more accessible to audiences. All the stuff there is to love about The Lord of the Rings  is there in the original versions, the plethora of new and extended scenes merely add to that for fans. And of those, they fall into three camps for me: 1....
1 comment
Read more

Back to the Feature: New York, New York (1977)

New York, New York  is a two hour forty minute musical movie largely about a toxic relationship and I understand why it was Martin Scorsese’s first big flop. Some have blamed its poor reception on the kind of movie it was, of a style and tone Scorsese wasn’t known for, but I find that hard to believe. Even after only five films, he’d proven himself an extremely versatile director, and Alice Doesn’t Live Here Anymore  found an audience. Sure this jazz musical love letter to New York City was following up Taxi Driver and its’ far more cynical take on the city, but then it’s also ‘from the director of Taxi Driver ’ which itself was a big hit. Was it a matter of public appetite for musicals, or mere word of mouth and early critical reception that dissuaded viewers? Irrespective of that, I was stunned to discover this movie was the origin of the titular song, which I’d assumed was much older (it’s definitely got the sound of something that might have come out of the Jazz sce...
Post a Comment
Read more