Skip to main content

Back to the Feature: How the West Was Won (1962)


When I see a movie like How the West Was Won, a part of me laments that they don’t make movies like this anymore. But they can and they should. This is actually one of those films I’d love to see a remake of because as great as the original is, I think it could be done even better today. The story of four generations of a family settling in the American west over a period of half a century is a really interesting one, and with the resources in visual effects, cinematography, and writing we have today, I’d love to see a new collection of filmmakers and actors take it on.
How the West Was Won has one of the best ensembles in film history. Where else will you see Gregory Peck, James Stewart, Henry Fonda, and Debbie Reynolds in one film? Not to mention Karl Malden, Eli Wallach, George Peppard, Caroll Baker, Lee J. Cobb, Richard Widmark, Robert Preston, Carolyn Jones, Harry Morgan, Thelma Ritter, Agnes Moorehead, Walter Brennan, Raymond Massey, and a cameo by John Wayne. Oh yeah, and it’s narrated by Spencer Tracy. And practically all of them perform exceptionally. In addition to that, the film was co-directed by Henry Hathaway, George Marshall, and the great John Ford.
The story begins with the Prescott family in New York in 1839. Patriarch Zebulon (Malden) wants to move his family, consisting of his wife Rebecca (Moorehead) and daughters Eve (Baker) and Lilith (Reynolds) to better prospects in Illinois. But circumstances throw the family apart and Eve winds up settling down in Illinois, while Lilith  moves further west. And from there we see the growth of their families alongside that of the frontier, moving through the exploration and settlement period, the Civil War, the beginnings of the railroad and lawlessness.
This film was promoted on its star power but there is more to it than that. The film addresses a number of different facets of the Old West and the evolution of the land and people. And this evolution feels natural and more than that, it’s a journey your being taken on. The grand scale of this epic underlines this effect, as do the characters. With each new cast of this family and their associates, you become more invested in them. Where they’re going, what will become of them, will they ever reunite? And the fact that there were many families like these who were witness to and helped make history makes it very fascinating. And there are nice little touches like how the song “A Home in the Meadow” (sung to the tune of “What Child Is This?”) is passed down through the generations. It creates a connectivity between the Prescotts of 1839 and their descendants by 1889.
How the West Was Won is divided into five segments following the branches of the Prescotts and there’s a discrepancy between the tone from segment to segment. The first section is a true frontier story, man vs. the harsh wilderness, and it’s followed by something of a road trip rom-com with the occasional peril. There’s also a dramatic coming-of-age war story, a big business corruption story, and a more traditional gunslinger vs. bandits show -complete with goons and a train robbery. Though at times this makes the film feel disjointed or even unfocussed, I like the diversity of it, and how it shows the variance of characters and situations peppered throughout the west. It also shows the talents of each director. Hathaway who directed three of the five demonstrates his range, while Marshall gets to play with intensity both in the quarrels between Zeb (Peppard) and rail magnate Tom King (Widmark), and in an intense buffalo stampede scene. And Ford of course adds a grandeur to a segment that demands the least of it.
The outstanding performances enhance the stories’ respective tones and the film’s feel overall. Jimmy Stewart is terrific as the mountain man love interest of Eve, and so is Henry Fonda as his friend, a mentor to Zeb who is played very well by George Peppard. Eli Wallach is completely at home as an outlaw, Karl Malden keeps your attention as the faithful forefather, Lee J. Cobb is great as the stern marshal, and Richard Widmark as that railway man is suitably despicable. Even minor performances stand out, like Thelma Ritter as Lilith’s husband-seeking friend, Walter Brennan as a river pirate, and Harry Morgan (who I loved on M*A*S*H) as Ulysses Grant. But my favourite performance was Gregory Peck’s portrayal of a gold-digging gambler. Fitting very well with the comedic nature of that story, it was refreshing to see Peck play a dishonest guy who though attracted to Lilith and in competition for her with Robert Preston’s wagonmaster, is also after her rumoured inheritance, and is travelling west to escape his debts. Peck’s one of my favourite actors and its always a great surprise to see him doing something new. And it helps that he’s working off of Preston’s good acting and the always entertaining and energetic Debbie Reynolds giving it her all.
However, this isn’t to say that movie isn’t without its problems. Like a lot of westerns from this era, the story, morals, and characters are heavily romanticized. There’s something of an old fashioned patriotic flare to the whole film about how glorious the conquest of the west was without touching much on the hardships. That is with the exception of the Civil War. Few of the heroic characters (again with the exception of Peck) have less appealing dimensions to them and as is expected for this kind of film, the grittiness is sucked out of the west. And of course, this is a fairly whitewashed movie. Despite the Civil War taking place during its course, we don’t see any slaves; and there are no Native American characters who do anything but attack (but at least they’re actually played by Native Americans). But I think the film overcomes all that with the fact that history is merely a backdrop to the characters and the journey. Apart from the appearances of General Grant and William Tecumsah Sherman (Wayne), historical figures and specific events aren’t portrayed. There isn’t much reason for Native Americans to be seen in another context, if even the one they are seen in, and the railroad sequence at least shows them retaliating for good reason: namely a dick violating a treaty for financial gain. It’s mainly the general atmosphere that’s romanticized and while I prefer it’d be more realistic, I can overlook it, certainly more than some other westerns of this time period.
The biggest problem though may be with the film’s aspect ratio. How the West Was Won was shot and released on specialized Cinerama, a curved wide-screen format shot on three projectors, which made for a really immersive cinematic experience. However it’s a format that’s been near impossible to transition to smaller flat screens. The result is a letterbox in the middle of a screen, which is made more distracting by the fact that the format never allowed for much variance in shot composition. No one is capable of being on screen at anything closer than a medium shot, and often have to be directly centred. It makes some of the interactions between characters a little awkward and the small scale diminishes the opportunity to enjoy the scenery. Apparently there have been some restorations that have fixed this, made it more like the original theatrical experience, but I think even on a Cinerama screen, the staleness of this unchanging cinematography would hold the film back. And for a film that John Ford worked on, that’s unbelievable.
But even things like the distracting cinematography and romanticized tone aren’t enough to hurt the film’s quality drastically. The compelling stories and characters are still very enjoyable and worth following. The star power was not wasted and the entire cast as well as directors bring something good to this intriguing American odyssey. Hell, again knowing how easily it would be to correct those problems it had now, I’d be very excited to see this story remade. This journey of a family through four generations in the Old West presented by brilliant directors and an ensemble like no other, makes for one of the last great Western Epics. And I really found it enticing. Though it may not have captured every aspect of early settlement, it did a good enough job ensuring that no one who sees it is going to forget How the West Was Won

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Strange History of the American Spoof Movie

Parody movies have been around for a lot longer than we tend to think of them. Even from the earliest days of Hollywood there were movies meant to satirize a particular subject or genre. In the silent era, Buster Keaton was responsible for a few. And in the early sound era, almost as soon as the monster pictures took off did you see comic versions of them -Abbott and Costello hosting a few. But parody movies tended to be subtle for most of cinema history, or parody came in conjunction with another goal of the comedy. It really wasn’t until the 1980s and 90s that it took off and became popularly understood. And there is perhaps a line to be drawn to the counterculture comedy explosion that began in the 1970s through avenues like  Saturday Night Live , which frequently parodied from even its earliest years popular movies and cultural properties of the time. But that is still a way’s back. To my generation though, ‘parody movie’ is perhaps a less known term than the more blunt ‘s...

Notes on the Title Cards of The Lord of the Rings

It might be sacrilege for one who both considers The Lord of the Rings  trilogy to be one of the greatest triumphs of cinema and has been an avid lover of the films since adolescence, to declare that the original theatrical cuts of the films are better than the much beloved extended editions. Easily it’s my most controversial opinion regarding these movies. Don’t get me wrong, I do like the extended editions quite a lot, especially as someone who just enjoys spending time in that universe. They flesh it out more, add extra flavour, and in increasing the length by about an hour really emphasize the epic quality of these films. But I find that the original cuts are generally more cleanly paced, more seamlessly edited, and much more accessible to audiences. All the stuff there is to love about The Lord of the Rings  is there in the original versions, the plethora of new and extended scenes merely add to that for fans. And of those, they fall into three camps for me: 1....

Back to the Feature: New York, New York (1977)

New York, New York  is a two hour forty minute musical movie largely about a toxic relationship and I understand why it was Martin Scorsese’s first big flop. Some have blamed its poor reception on the kind of movie it was, of a style and tone Scorsese wasn’t known for, but I find that hard to believe. Even after only five films, he’d proven himself an extremely versatile director, and Alice Doesn’t Live Here Anymore  found an audience. Sure this jazz musical love letter to New York City was following up Taxi Driver and its’ far more cynical take on the city, but then it’s also ‘from the director of Taxi Driver ’ which itself was a big hit. Was it a matter of public appetite for musicals, or mere word of mouth and early critical reception that dissuaded viewers? Irrespective of that, I was stunned to discover this movie was the origin of the titular song, which I’d assumed was much older (it’s definitely got the sound of something that might have come out of the Jazz sce...