Skip to main content

The Force is Strong With this One


I’m going to start off a little controversially by saying Star Wars: The Force Awakens doesn’t need to exist. Return of the Jedi ended the story of Star Wars on a very satisfying note that not even the prequels could diminish. Until 2012 it didn’t look like we’d be getting any more Star Wars and that was fine. That original trilogy had already proven its timelessness and its status as one of the great motion picture sagas. Bearing that in mind, Star Wars: The Force Awakens is very welcome.
J.J. Abrams you may know as the director of the recent Star Trek films, but Star Wars is much more his comfort zone. And he really is able to capture the tone and emotional resonance of Star Wars while also letting it feel fresh and new. It’s a great balance of old and new, and I think it really succeeds. This is clearly a Star Wars film and a J.J. Abrams film. However it is not without its missteps. Though a far cry from the unfortunate prequels, it isn’t quite on par with the original trilogy.
Thirty years after Return of the Jedi, Luke Skywalker (Mark Hamill) has vanished and is being sought after by both the Resistance, under the backing of the New Republic, as well as the First Order, a successor to the Empire. The final clue to his location is found and given by pilot Poe Dameron (Oscar Isaac) to his droid BB-8 to deliver to the Resistance. BB-8 eventually meets up with a scavenger called Rey (Daisy Ridley). She teams up with an ex-stormtrooper Finn (John Boyega) and together they decide to return BB-8 themselves eventually coming across the Millennium Falcon and its former pilots Han Solo (Harrison Ford) and Chewbacca (Peter Mayhew). But they’re being pursued by a mysterious figure called Kylo Ren (Adam Driver) while the Order he belongs to is readying Starkiller Base, a massive station that can destroy star systems.
As you can probably tell, the plot really parallels that of A New Hope. In that it focuses on getting a droid with secret data to a resistance, while the villains have a planet-like superweapon that must be destroyed. And while the story parallels are a nice acknowledgment of what came before, they at times get too obvious that it distracts from the story being told, and almost feels derivative. The overarching story has more meat to it and more facets that are worth exploring. There are some mysteries alluded to that are very promising, some detours that are taken quite enjoyable. I just wish the journey itself felt a little more original. Too many of the environments and situations felt familiar and I think that if the film had taken a couple more chances it could have made a good story a great one. In addition, there’s little exposition as to how we got from the universe of Jedi to this one making the set-up feel confused (there’s both a New Republic AND Resistance?) and though the film is excellent in its use of practical effects there is one scene that has really overused and really bad CGI.
But if the story isn’t the film’s backbone, what is? The characters! Our old favourites like Han, Leia, and Chewie didn’t need to win us over, but the new ones did. Luckily, Rey and Finn are engaging and very interesting protagonists. Finn’s backstory fascinated me even before seeing the movie, and Rey kept getting more intriguing. I really like that we have a female protagonist of a Star Wars film! And Kylo Ren makes for a thoroughly intimidating and layered villain. Halfway through, I realized I’d be enjoying myself even without the old characters. I really want to follow these new heroes, their relationships, charisma, see what adventures are in store for them. But the old cast were terrific and wonderful to revisit as well, completely worthy of the cheers they received. They all felt real to where their characters would be thirty years on, especially Han, who receives the most focus. Isaac’s Poe is really fun, and among others we got an enjoyably over-the-top performance from Domhnall Gleeson as General Hux.
And this is a film with practical effects, with a clear sense of direction, and with good writing (from Abrams and Lawrence Kasdan) that’s both just the right amount of clever and corny. The action sequences are decent and there’s plenty of fan service but not too much to fall into the prequel traps. None of what made the prequels bad is present here. It’s got its own great sense of humour apart from the previous films and its own style. And Star Wars: The Force Awakens does captivate you, it does surprise you and move you. I want to return to this universe and these characters! So though it doesn’t live up to the hype (which would have been impossible), has some story problems, and doesn’t have the classic magic, I know I’ll definitely be seeing it again! It’s really worth seeing again!

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Disney's Mulan, Cultural Appropriation, and Exploitation

I’m late on this one I know. I wasn’t willing to spend thirty bucks back in September for a movie experience I knew was going to be far poorer than if I had paid half that at a theatre. So I waited for it to hit streaming for free to give it a shot. In the meantime I heard that it wasn’t very good, but I remained determined not to skip it entirely, partly out of sympathy for director Niki Caro and partly out of morbid curiosity. Disney’s live-action Mulan  I was actually mildly looking forward to early in the year in spite of my well-documented distaste for this series of creative dead zones by the most powerful media conglomerate on earth. Mulan  was never one of Disney’s classics, a movie extremely of its time in its “girl power” gender politics and with a decidedly American take on ancient Chinese mythology. It got by on a couple good songs and a strong lead, but it was a movie that could be improved upon, and this new version looked like it had the potential to do that, emphasizing
Post a Comment
Read more

The Hays Code was Bad, Sex in Movies is Good

Don't Look Now (1973) Will Hays, Who Knows About Sex In 1930, former Republican politician and chair of the Motion Picture Association of America Will Hayes introduced a series of self-censorship guidelines for the movie industry in response to a mixture of celebrity scandals and lobbying from the Catholic Church against various ‘immoralities’ creating a perception of Hollywood as corrupt and indecent. The Hays Code, or the Motion Picture Production Code, was formally adopted in 1930, though not stringently enforced until 1934 under the auspices of Joseph Breen. It laid out a careful list of what was and wasn’t acceptable for a film expecting major distribution. It stipulated rules against profanity, the depiction of miscegenation, and offensive portrayals of the clergy, but a lot of it was based around sexual content: “sexual perversion” of any kind was disallowed, as were any opaquely textual or visual allusions to reproduction, and right near the top “No licentious or suggestiv
Post a Comment
Read more

Pixar Sundays: The Incredibles (2004)

          Brad Bird was already a master by the time he came to Pixar. Not only did he hone his craft as an early director on The Simpsons , but he directed a little animated film for Warner Bros. in 1999, that though not a box office success was loved by critics and quickly grew a cult following. The Iron Giant is now among many people’s favourite animated movies. Likewise, Bird’s feature debut at Pixar, The Incredibles , his own variation of a superhero movie, is often considered one of the studio’s best. And for very good reason, as the most talented director at Pixar shows.            Superheroes were once the world’s greatest crime-fighting force until several lawsuits for collateral damage (and in the case of Mr. Incredible, a hilarious suicide prevention), outlawed their vigilantism. Fifteen years later Mr. Incredible, now living as Bob Parr, has a family with his wife Helen, the former Elastigirl. But Bob, in a combination of mid-life crisis and nostalgia for the old day
1 comment
Read more