Skip to main content

The Force is Strong With this One


I’m going to start off a little controversially by saying Star Wars: The Force Awakens doesn’t need to exist. Return of the Jedi ended the story of Star Wars on a very satisfying note that not even the prequels could diminish. Until 2012 it didn’t look like we’d be getting any more Star Wars and that was fine. That original trilogy had already proven its timelessness and its status as one of the great motion picture sagas. Bearing that in mind, Star Wars: The Force Awakens is very welcome.
J.J. Abrams you may know as the director of the recent Star Trek films, but Star Wars is much more his comfort zone. And he really is able to capture the tone and emotional resonance of Star Wars while also letting it feel fresh and new. It’s a great balance of old and new, and I think it really succeeds. This is clearly a Star Wars film and a J.J. Abrams film. However it is not without its missteps. Though a far cry from the unfortunate prequels, it isn’t quite on par with the original trilogy.
Thirty years after Return of the Jedi, Luke Skywalker (Mark Hamill) has vanished and is being sought after by both the Resistance, under the backing of the New Republic, as well as the First Order, a successor to the Empire. The final clue to his location is found and given by pilot Poe Dameron (Oscar Isaac) to his droid BB-8 to deliver to the Resistance. BB-8 eventually meets up with a scavenger called Rey (Daisy Ridley). She teams up with an ex-stormtrooper Finn (John Boyega) and together they decide to return BB-8 themselves eventually coming across the Millennium Falcon and its former pilots Han Solo (Harrison Ford) and Chewbacca (Peter Mayhew). But they’re being pursued by a mysterious figure called Kylo Ren (Adam Driver) while the Order he belongs to is readying Starkiller Base, a massive station that can destroy star systems.
As you can probably tell, the plot really parallels that of A New Hope. In that it focuses on getting a droid with secret data to a resistance, while the villains have a planet-like superweapon that must be destroyed. And while the story parallels are a nice acknowledgment of what came before, they at times get too obvious that it distracts from the story being told, and almost feels derivative. The overarching story has more meat to it and more facets that are worth exploring. There are some mysteries alluded to that are very promising, some detours that are taken quite enjoyable. I just wish the journey itself felt a little more original. Too many of the environments and situations felt familiar and I think that if the film had taken a couple more chances it could have made a good story a great one. In addition, there’s little exposition as to how we got from the universe of Jedi to this one making the set-up feel confused (there’s both a New Republic AND Resistance?) and though the film is excellent in its use of practical effects there is one scene that has really overused and really bad CGI.
But if the story isn’t the film’s backbone, what is? The characters! Our old favourites like Han, Leia, and Chewie didn’t need to win us over, but the new ones did. Luckily, Rey and Finn are engaging and very interesting protagonists. Finn’s backstory fascinated me even before seeing the movie, and Rey kept getting more intriguing. I really like that we have a female protagonist of a Star Wars film! And Kylo Ren makes for a thoroughly intimidating and layered villain. Halfway through, I realized I’d be enjoying myself even without the old characters. I really want to follow these new heroes, their relationships, charisma, see what adventures are in store for them. But the old cast were terrific and wonderful to revisit as well, completely worthy of the cheers they received. They all felt real to where their characters would be thirty years on, especially Han, who receives the most focus. Isaac’s Poe is really fun, and among others we got an enjoyably over-the-top performance from Domhnall Gleeson as General Hux.
And this is a film with practical effects, with a clear sense of direction, and with good writing (from Abrams and Lawrence Kasdan) that’s both just the right amount of clever and corny. The action sequences are decent and there’s plenty of fan service but not too much to fall into the prequel traps. None of what made the prequels bad is present here. It’s got its own great sense of humour apart from the previous films and its own style. And Star Wars: The Force Awakens does captivate you, it does surprise you and move you. I want to return to this universe and these characters! So though it doesn’t live up to the hype (which would have been impossible), has some story problems, and doesn’t have the classic magic, I know I’ll definitely be seeing it again! It’s really worth seeing again!

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Strange History of the American Spoof Movie

Parody movies have been around for a lot longer than we tend to think of them. Even from the earliest days of Hollywood there were movies meant to satirize a particular subject or genre. In the silent era, Buster Keaton was responsible for a few. And in the early sound era, almost as soon as the monster pictures took off did you see comic versions of them -Abbott and Costello hosting a few. But parody movies tended to be subtle for most of cinema history, or parody came in conjunction with another goal of the comedy. It really wasn’t until the 1980s and 90s that it took off and became popularly understood. And there is perhaps a line to be drawn to the counterculture comedy explosion that began in the 1970s through avenues like  Saturday Night Live , which frequently parodied from even its earliest years popular movies and cultural properties of the time. But that is still a way’s back. To my generation though, ‘parody movie’ is perhaps a less known term than the more blunt ‘s...
Post a Comment
Read more

Notes on the Title Cards of The Lord of the Rings

It might be sacrilege for one who both considers The Lord of the Rings  trilogy to be one of the greatest triumphs of cinema and has been an avid lover of the films since adolescence, to declare that the original theatrical cuts of the films are better than the much beloved extended editions. Easily it’s my most controversial opinion regarding these movies. Don’t get me wrong, I do like the extended editions quite a lot, especially as someone who just enjoys spending time in that universe. They flesh it out more, add extra flavour, and in increasing the length by about an hour really emphasize the epic quality of these films. But I find that the original cuts are generally more cleanly paced, more seamlessly edited, and much more accessible to audiences. All the stuff there is to love about The Lord of the Rings  is there in the original versions, the plethora of new and extended scenes merely add to that for fans. And of those, they fall into three camps for me: 1....
1 comment
Read more

Back to the Feature: New York, New York (1977)

New York, New York  is a two hour forty minute musical movie largely about a toxic relationship and I understand why it was Martin Scorsese’s first big flop. Some have blamed its poor reception on the kind of movie it was, of a style and tone Scorsese wasn’t known for, but I find that hard to believe. Even after only five films, he’d proven himself an extremely versatile director, and Alice Doesn’t Live Here Anymore  found an audience. Sure this jazz musical love letter to New York City was following up Taxi Driver and its’ far more cynical take on the city, but then it’s also ‘from the director of Taxi Driver ’ which itself was a big hit. Was it a matter of public appetite for musicals, or mere word of mouth and early critical reception that dissuaded viewers? Irrespective of that, I was stunned to discover this movie was the origin of the titular song, which I’d assumed was much older (it’s definitely got the sound of something that might have come out of the Jazz sce...
Post a Comment
Read more