Skip to main content

Doctor Who (Spoilers!) Review: "The Husbands of River Song"

                Anyone who gets into a conversation with me about Doctor Who will at some point discover that I hate River Song. I’m not going to rant about it here, but suffice it to say I think Steven Moffatt took a promising one-time character and turned her into one of the most insufferable, one-note scene-hoggers I’ve ever seen on television. I know I’m in a minority and I’ve got nothing against Alex Kingston, but the idea that someone like her is this close to the Doctor depresses me and every episode with her I know isn’t going to be enjoyable. “The Name of the Doctor” seemed to put an end to her character arc, tying up loose ends and giving her fans some fitting closure. But as Moffatt proved in “Hell Bent” he doesn’t mind beating a dead horse.
                And thus we sadly see the return of River in “The Husbands of River Song” (god I hate how her name has to take up the title!). The Doctor arrives on some human planet in the future called Mendorax Dellora where he is called on to be the surgeon to assist the dying King Baymax… I mean Hydroflax whose wife just happens to be River. However River has never met the Twelfth Doctor and doesn’t recognize him, something that startles the Doctor due to directions of their timelines. Secretly River wants to remove Hydroflax’s head to get a rare diamond lodged inside. The King discovers this and is revealed to be two parts a separate head and body; he tries to kill them. The Doctor and River escape, get into trouble with Hydroflax’s servants and come across the TARDIS, leading her to believe the Doctor is here on the planet not knowing she’s actually with the Doctor. Oh yeah, and Hydroflax keeps replacing his heads and seeks to eventually have the Doctor’s.
                I hope you got that, this is a difficult episode to describe. Like many Moffatt and River stories, the plot is fast-paced, needlessly convoluted and not the easiest to follow. But there are Doctor Who episodes like that that work, however this episode didn’t add much to make it entertaining. I’ll admit there are some good visuals, but there’s not a good laugh to be had in the hour no matter how hard it tries with the typical fare of River’s innuendo and “quirky” flirtation. And as usual for the episodes she’s in, the focus is almost entirely on River and her relationship with the Doctor; how much her life revolves around him, while occasionally bringing up her archaeological history. But at least we didn’t get a forced “spoilers” line or “sweetie”. That came from the Doctor.
                As has often been the case of the lesser episodes in the last couple years, Peter Capaldi pulls it through, or at least makes it watchable. He does the best possible work with the material and though his chemistry with Kingston isn’t as developed as Matt Smith’s, he’s the better actor. He seems like a good match for Kingston and is clearly enjoying himself while taking the material seriously. Kingston easily falls back into her part unfortunately, though I thought it was a nice touch that she doesn’t know she’s with the Doctor the whole time. It was different and I appreciated the parallel to her first episode, back when she was a mystery. But as always I feel Kingston like the Doctor, could do a lot better than River. Greg Davies plays Hydroflax but doesn’t get to do much with the part. I think someone just wanted to put Davies’ decapitated head on the TARDIS console. He does however have a larger part than Matt Lucas as some servant who was cast just so someone could put Lucas’ head rather goofily on a giant robot. Both Davies and Lucas are the latest in a long line of good comedians who are really wasted in episodes of Doctor Who. Like when they got Mitchell and Webb to play those robots in “Dinosaurs on a Spaceship”, or Bill Bailey in “The Lion, the Widow, and the Wardrobe”. In fact the only comedian who Doctor Who’s utilized well may have been Frank Skinner in “Mummy on the Orient Express”.
                There isn’t really anything interesting when it comes to the spoilers (and I’m not saying that in a stupid River inflection!). Eventually River discovers that the Doctor is the Doctor and they crash a big ship on the planet Darilium (mentioned by River in “The Silence in the Library”) in a manner that almost looks like a recreation of Adric’s death. We get some strange effects, including a humanoid giving himself a lobotomy, they destroy Hydroflax’s body, the Doctor plants the idea of building a restaurant on the planet, and then travels forward in time to treat River to one last evening there in view of the Singing Towers. That last scene where they’re overlooking a romantic sunset, I can completely empathize with River fans getting emotional. It has no effect on me because I don’t give a damn about her, but aside from her being in it and maybe a little too much sappiness, there’s nothing I can honestly find wrong with it. This scene is implicitly the last time (again!) the Doctor and River will see each other. It’s shot nicely and admittedly both Capaldi and Kingston are really good in it. It’s a shame such a decent scene had to be preceded by so much mediocrity. Ironic considering last year’s “Last Christmas” was really good except for the last ten minutes, that this year’s special was sort of the opposite.
                “The Husbands of River Song” wasn’t terrible and nowhere near as insulting as a couple of the River episodes can be. But it’s convoluted, unfunny, with wasted talent, and focuses exclusively on a character we haven’t seen in years who quite frankly got more than enough focus that year the series briefly became The River Song Show. But like “The Doctor, the Widow, and the Wardrobe it’s just bland and forgettable. Maybe that’s necessary given how the last series ended, but I like Christmas specials to leave more of an impression. Though in all honesty only a couple Doctor Who specials have done that. I’m glad it sounds like we won’t be seeing River again, though we thought that before, and given how mediocre the episode would have been without her, her appearance feels very pointless apart from that last scene. I’m looking forward to the next series where we’ll get a new companion, new adventures, (hopefully new writers and/or showrunner) and less episodes like this that feel the need to reopen an old book. And one that I think never needed to be opened in the first place.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Strange History of the American Spoof Movie

Parody movies have been around for a lot longer than we tend to think of them. Even from the earliest days of Hollywood there were movies meant to satirize a particular subject or genre. In the silent era, Buster Keaton was responsible for a few. And in the early sound era, almost as soon as the monster pictures took off did you see comic versions of them -Abbott and Costello hosting a few. But parody movies tended to be subtle for most of cinema history, or parody came in conjunction with another goal of the comedy. It really wasn’t until the 1980s and 90s that it took off and became popularly understood. And there is perhaps a line to be drawn to the counterculture comedy explosion that began in the 1970s through avenues like  Saturday Night Live , which frequently parodied from even its earliest years popular movies and cultural properties of the time. But that is still a way’s back. To my generation though, ‘parody movie’ is perhaps a less known term than the more blunt ‘s...

Notes on the Title Cards of The Lord of the Rings

It might be sacrilege for one who both considers The Lord of the Rings  trilogy to be one of the greatest triumphs of cinema and has been an avid lover of the films since adolescence, to declare that the original theatrical cuts of the films are better than the much beloved extended editions. Easily it’s my most controversial opinion regarding these movies. Don’t get me wrong, I do like the extended editions quite a lot, especially as someone who just enjoys spending time in that universe. They flesh it out more, add extra flavour, and in increasing the length by about an hour really emphasize the epic quality of these films. But I find that the original cuts are generally more cleanly paced, more seamlessly edited, and much more accessible to audiences. All the stuff there is to love about The Lord of the Rings  is there in the original versions, the plethora of new and extended scenes merely add to that for fans. And of those, they fall into three camps for me: 1....

Back to the Feature: New York, New York (1977)

New York, New York  is a two hour forty minute musical movie largely about a toxic relationship and I understand why it was Martin Scorsese’s first big flop. Some have blamed its poor reception on the kind of movie it was, of a style and tone Scorsese wasn’t known for, but I find that hard to believe. Even after only five films, he’d proven himself an extremely versatile director, and Alice Doesn’t Live Here Anymore  found an audience. Sure this jazz musical love letter to New York City was following up Taxi Driver and its’ far more cynical take on the city, but then it’s also ‘from the director of Taxi Driver ’ which itself was a big hit. Was it a matter of public appetite for musicals, or mere word of mouth and early critical reception that dissuaded viewers? Irrespective of that, I was stunned to discover this movie was the origin of the titular song, which I’d assumed was much older (it’s definitely got the sound of something that might have come out of the Jazz sce...