Skip to main content

Doctor Who (Spoilers!) Review: "The Husbands of River Song"

                Anyone who gets into a conversation with me about Doctor Who will at some point discover that I hate River Song. I’m not going to rant about it here, but suffice it to say I think Steven Moffatt took a promising one-time character and turned her into one of the most insufferable, one-note scene-hoggers I’ve ever seen on television. I know I’m in a minority and I’ve got nothing against Alex Kingston, but the idea that someone like her is this close to the Doctor depresses me and every episode with her I know isn’t going to be enjoyable. “The Name of the Doctor” seemed to put an end to her character arc, tying up loose ends and giving her fans some fitting closure. But as Moffatt proved in “Hell Bent” he doesn’t mind beating a dead horse.
                And thus we sadly see the return of River in “The Husbands of River Song” (god I hate how her name has to take up the title!). The Doctor arrives on some human planet in the future called Mendorax Dellora where he is called on to be the surgeon to assist the dying King Baymax… I mean Hydroflax whose wife just happens to be River. However River has never met the Twelfth Doctor and doesn’t recognize him, something that startles the Doctor due to directions of their timelines. Secretly River wants to remove Hydroflax’s head to get a rare diamond lodged inside. The King discovers this and is revealed to be two parts a separate head and body; he tries to kill them. The Doctor and River escape, get into trouble with Hydroflax’s servants and come across the TARDIS, leading her to believe the Doctor is here on the planet not knowing she’s actually with the Doctor. Oh yeah, and Hydroflax keeps replacing his heads and seeks to eventually have the Doctor’s.
                I hope you got that, this is a difficult episode to describe. Like many Moffatt and River stories, the plot is fast-paced, needlessly convoluted and not the easiest to follow. But there are Doctor Who episodes like that that work, however this episode didn’t add much to make it entertaining. I’ll admit there are some good visuals, but there’s not a good laugh to be had in the hour no matter how hard it tries with the typical fare of River’s innuendo and “quirky” flirtation. And as usual for the episodes she’s in, the focus is almost entirely on River and her relationship with the Doctor; how much her life revolves around him, while occasionally bringing up her archaeological history. But at least we didn’t get a forced “spoilers” line or “sweetie”. That came from the Doctor.
                As has often been the case of the lesser episodes in the last couple years, Peter Capaldi pulls it through, or at least makes it watchable. He does the best possible work with the material and though his chemistry with Kingston isn’t as developed as Matt Smith’s, he’s the better actor. He seems like a good match for Kingston and is clearly enjoying himself while taking the material seriously. Kingston easily falls back into her part unfortunately, though I thought it was a nice touch that she doesn’t know she’s with the Doctor the whole time. It was different and I appreciated the parallel to her first episode, back when she was a mystery. But as always I feel Kingston like the Doctor, could do a lot better than River. Greg Davies plays Hydroflax but doesn’t get to do much with the part. I think someone just wanted to put Davies’ decapitated head on the TARDIS console. He does however have a larger part than Matt Lucas as some servant who was cast just so someone could put Lucas’ head rather goofily on a giant robot. Both Davies and Lucas are the latest in a long line of good comedians who are really wasted in episodes of Doctor Who. Like when they got Mitchell and Webb to play those robots in “Dinosaurs on a Spaceship”, or Bill Bailey in “The Lion, the Widow, and the Wardrobe”. In fact the only comedian who Doctor Who’s utilized well may have been Frank Skinner in “Mummy on the Orient Express”.
                There isn’t really anything interesting when it comes to the spoilers (and I’m not saying that in a stupid River inflection!). Eventually River discovers that the Doctor is the Doctor and they crash a big ship on the planet Darilium (mentioned by River in “The Silence in the Library”) in a manner that almost looks like a recreation of Adric’s death. We get some strange effects, including a humanoid giving himself a lobotomy, they destroy Hydroflax’s body, the Doctor plants the idea of building a restaurant on the planet, and then travels forward in time to treat River to one last evening there in view of the Singing Towers. That last scene where they’re overlooking a romantic sunset, I can completely empathize with River fans getting emotional. It has no effect on me because I don’t give a damn about her, but aside from her being in it and maybe a little too much sappiness, there’s nothing I can honestly find wrong with it. This scene is implicitly the last time (again!) the Doctor and River will see each other. It’s shot nicely and admittedly both Capaldi and Kingston are really good in it. It’s a shame such a decent scene had to be preceded by so much mediocrity. Ironic considering last year’s “Last Christmas” was really good except for the last ten minutes, that this year’s special was sort of the opposite.
                “The Husbands of River Song” wasn’t terrible and nowhere near as insulting as a couple of the River episodes can be. But it’s convoluted, unfunny, with wasted talent, and focuses exclusively on a character we haven’t seen in years who quite frankly got more than enough focus that year the series briefly became The River Song Show. But like “The Doctor, the Widow, and the Wardrobe it’s just bland and forgettable. Maybe that’s necessary given how the last series ended, but I like Christmas specials to leave more of an impression. Though in all honesty only a couple Doctor Who specials have done that. I’m glad it sounds like we won’t be seeing River again, though we thought that before, and given how mediocre the episode would have been without her, her appearance feels very pointless apart from that last scene. I’m looking forward to the next series where we’ll get a new companion, new adventures, (hopefully new writers and/or showrunner) and less episodes like this that feel the need to reopen an old book. And one that I think never needed to be opened in the first place.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Disney's Mulan, Cultural Appropriation, and Exploitation

I’m late on this one I know. I wasn’t willing to spend thirty bucks back in September for a movie experience I knew was going to be far poorer than if I had paid half that at a theatre. So I waited for it to hit streaming for free to give it a shot. In the meantime I heard that it wasn’t very good, but I remained determined not to skip it entirely, partly out of sympathy for director Niki Caro and partly out of morbid curiosity. Disney’s live-action Mulan  I was actually mildly looking forward to early in the year in spite of my well-documented distaste for this series of creative dead zones by the most powerful media conglomerate on earth. Mulan  was never one of Disney’s classics, a movie extremely of its time in its “girl power” gender politics and with a decidedly American take on ancient Chinese mythology. It got by on a couple good songs and a strong lead, but it was a movie that could be improved upon, and this new version looked like it had the potential to do that, emphasizing

The Hays Code was Bad, Sex in Movies is Good

Don't Look Now (1973) Will Hays, Who Knows About Sex In 1930, former Republican politician and chair of the Motion Picture Association of America Will Hayes introduced a series of self-censorship guidelines for the movie industry in response to a mixture of celebrity scandals and lobbying from the Catholic Church against various ‘immoralities’ creating a perception of Hollywood as corrupt and indecent. The Hays Code, or the Motion Picture Production Code, was formally adopted in 1930, though not stringently enforced until 1934 under the auspices of Joseph Breen. It laid out a careful list of what was and wasn’t acceptable for a film expecting major distribution. It stipulated rules against profanity, the depiction of miscegenation, and offensive portrayals of the clergy, but a lot of it was based around sexual content: “sexual perversion” of any kind was disallowed, as were any opaquely textual or visual allusions to reproduction, and right near the top “No licentious or suggestiv

Pixar Sundays: The Incredibles (2004)

          Brad Bird was already a master by the time he came to Pixar. Not only did he hone his craft as an early director on The Simpsons , but he directed a little animated film for Warner Bros. in 1999, that though not a box office success was loved by critics and quickly grew a cult following. The Iron Giant is now among many people’s favourite animated movies. Likewise, Bird’s feature debut at Pixar, The Incredibles , his own variation of a superhero movie, is often considered one of the studio’s best. And for very good reason, as the most talented director at Pixar shows.            Superheroes were once the world’s greatest crime-fighting force until several lawsuits for collateral damage (and in the case of Mr. Incredible, a hilarious suicide prevention), outlawed their vigilantism. Fifteen years later Mr. Incredible, now living as Bob Parr, has a family with his wife Helen, the former Elastigirl. But Bob, in a combination of mid-life crisis and nostalgia for the old day