Skip to main content

Thank You Mr. Watterson


               In the world of newspaper comic strips only Charles M. Schulz himself has had more of an influence than Bill Watterson, something asserted more than once in Dear Mr. Watterson the debut documentary of filmmaker Joel Allen Schroeder exploring the career, impact, and legacy of Watterson and his famed creation Calvin and Hobbes.
                Having been born in the early 90’s, I was too young to read Calvin and Hobbes in newspapers (1985-1995) but like many worldwide before and since, I was introduced to the strip through the book collections. Those eighteen collections are now the only sources for ten years of work due to Watterson’s famous refusal to license the strip something else the documentary dives into.
                The film follows Schroeder a massive Calvin and Hobbes fan from Wisconsin exploring the history and impact of Watterson and his strip. He visits Watterson’s hometown of Chagrin Falls, Ohio where the cartoonists’ inspiration is seen in the geography itself (particularly the town centre reflecting the artwork on the back of The Essential Calvin and Hobbes) and in library archives of the Billy Ireland Cartoon Library & Museum at Ohio State University manages to find samples of Watterson’s early work as a political cartoonist, original prints of strips, and samples of older comics that influenced the look and style of Calvin and Hobbes such as Pogo, Krazy Kat, Little Nemo, and of course Peanuts. The journey and discoveries are interspersed with interviews with fans worldwide including Nevin Martell (author of Looking for Calvin and Hobbes), Jean Schulz, actor Seth Green, and cartoon editor and Watterson’s friend Lee Salem as well as other cartoonists influenced by his work including Berkeley Breathed (Bloom County, Outland, Opus), Stephan Pastis (Pearls Before Swine), Jef Mallett (Frazz), and Bill Amend (Fox Trot).
                The documentary touches but doesn’t dwell on Watterson’s notorious reclusiveness (since the strip ended in 1995 he’s been unseen by the public, cherishing his privacy), but focuses more on the effect he left on the world, how he revolutionized the Sunday strip and set a standard for quality artwork in newspaper comics. He longed to bring back the quality newspaper comics had in their heyday, the 1940s and 50s when weekend strips often covered a whole page of print and there was great freedom in panel variability, something lost by the 1980s when newspapers were choosing to shrink the Sundays to as little as a corner of a page. Watterson defied these conventions using the Sundays to better showcase the artistic range a comic strip can have, constructing panel shapes, sizes, and numbers the way he saw fit. The film goes into extensive detail of Watterson’s refusal to license. With the strip as popular as it was it was only natural for the syndicate to want to make a profit. Merchandising had of course contributed to the success of strips such as Peanuts and Garfield. But Watterson felt that merchandising would take away from the strip itself and furthermore he was an artist above all else preferring to be in complete control of his world and characters.
Overall the documentary is marvelous. There are only a couple missteps: the strip itself could have been more delved into and Pastis goes on a bit long on merchandising, for example, but overall it is exactly what you’d expect from a documentary on the subject. The project began as a campaign on Kickstarter, perhaps a symbol of the success such websites can have. It is also admirable that Schroeder doesn’t attempt to track down Watterson as others have tried in the past. True Calvin and Hobbes fans respect the privacy Watterson desires. More than anything though, the film stands as a testament to the great power the strip has had both during its run in papers and as new fans begin reading today, its lasting influence and legacy in terms of artwork and style on cartoonists since (Breathed states “my initial impression when I saw it was, the guy’s making it harder for the rest of us”), and the magic of childhood nostalgia and imagination. To me and many others Calvin and Hobbes is something personal that speaks to us. It is the perfect blend of spectacular artwork, genius humour, compelling philosophy, and touching sentimentality and no other comic strip will ever achieve that.
This is what Dear Mr. Watterson leaves us with, in addition to being a wonderful love letter to the fans it makes those fans want to go back and reread that ten year body of work and experience Calvin and Hobbes again as if it were the first time.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Strange History of the American Spoof Movie

Parody movies have been around for a lot longer than we tend to think of them. Even from the earliest days of Hollywood there were movies meant to satirize a particular subject or genre. In the silent era, Buster Keaton was responsible for a few. And in the early sound era, almost as soon as the monster pictures took off did you see comic versions of them -Abbott and Costello hosting a few. But parody movies tended to be subtle for most of cinema history, or parody came in conjunction with another goal of the comedy. It really wasn’t until the 1980s and 90s that it took off and became popularly understood. And there is perhaps a line to be drawn to the counterculture comedy explosion that began in the 1970s through avenues like  Saturday Night Live , which frequently parodied from even its earliest years popular movies and cultural properties of the time. But that is still a way’s back. To my generation though, ‘parody movie’ is perhaps a less known term than the more blunt ‘s...
Post a Comment
Read more

Notes on the Title Cards of The Lord of the Rings

It might be sacrilege for one who both considers The Lord of the Rings  trilogy to be one of the greatest triumphs of cinema and has been an avid lover of the films since adolescence, to declare that the original theatrical cuts of the films are better than the much beloved extended editions. Easily it’s my most controversial opinion regarding these movies. Don’t get me wrong, I do like the extended editions quite a lot, especially as someone who just enjoys spending time in that universe. They flesh it out more, add extra flavour, and in increasing the length by about an hour really emphasize the epic quality of these films. But I find that the original cuts are generally more cleanly paced, more seamlessly edited, and much more accessible to audiences. All the stuff there is to love about The Lord of the Rings  is there in the original versions, the plethora of new and extended scenes merely add to that for fans. And of those, they fall into three camps for me: 1....
1 comment
Read more

Back to the Feature: New York, New York (1977)

New York, New York  is a two hour forty minute musical movie largely about a toxic relationship and I understand why it was Martin Scorsese’s first big flop. Some have blamed its poor reception on the kind of movie it was, of a style and tone Scorsese wasn’t known for, but I find that hard to believe. Even after only five films, he’d proven himself an extremely versatile director, and Alice Doesn’t Live Here Anymore  found an audience. Sure this jazz musical love letter to New York City was following up Taxi Driver and its’ far more cynical take on the city, but then it’s also ‘from the director of Taxi Driver ’ which itself was a big hit. Was it a matter of public appetite for musicals, or mere word of mouth and early critical reception that dissuaded viewers? Irrespective of that, I was stunned to discover this movie was the origin of the titular song, which I’d assumed was much older (it’s definitely got the sound of something that might have come out of the Jazz sce...
Post a Comment
Read more