Skip to main content

Doctor Who (Spoilers!) Review: "The Woman Who Lived"

              Virginia Woolf’s Orlando is definitely one of the most fascinating stories and characters in literature. Its 1992 film adaptation is certainly worth seeking out for Tilda Swinton’s amazing performance and some really significant themes on gender and identity. I bring it up because this episode of Doctor Who, “The Woman Who Died” centring on an immortal who’s been living through centuries of European history, is very similar in set-up.
                The Doctor comes face to face with the consequences of his actions in “The Girl Who Died” in this follow-up which is almost as good. It explores the drama of the situation and condition the Doctor left Ashildr in as well as the overall nature of his Lone Ranger-come-into-town-solve-problem-and-leave tendency. Add to that some great set pieces, the show having fun in an era I don’t think it’s visited since “The Visitation” (referenced in this episode), and the fact that one of the things I liked best about “The Girl Who Died” were the moments between Peter Capaldi and Maisie Williams. This episode is almost nothing but those!
                The Doctor arrives in the seventeenth century where he reunites with Ashildr who has lost most of her memories and identity over the centuries of immortality, save for the Doctor. She refers to herself by only the name of “Me”, keeps to herself avoiding attachments, and recently has taken up a career as a highwayman known as the Knightmare. The Doctor is looking for a dangerous amulet and “Me” agrees to help him hoping it will convince him to take her away from Earth. But it soon becomes apparent she has an alternative more devious plan, and may not be honest about what she remembers.
                The conflict of this story comes almost entirely based on the Doctor’s decision at the end of the last episode to save Ashildr’s life. That last shot where we saw her growing bitter through the ages with the curse of everlasting life really pays off here. We find out in this episode what’s she’s been up to. She took part in some important historical events, playing a significant role in the Battle of Agincourt and saving a village during the Black Plague. But we also learn of the darker side of this life that’s stuck with her, such as the fact she had three children who common to the era, died in infancy. The idea of an immortal being forced to live on as friends around them leave or die has been covered in relation to the Doctor. At one point Ashildr asks how many Claras have there been. The answer the Doctor doesn’t give is upwards of fifty. We see this shared connection between them, but for the much younger (even with her extended life) Ashildr it feels more tragic. The Doctor also learns what she’s had to resort to, in her desperation, having killed and having no qualms with killing. He really has created another Jack Harkness (who gets a nice shout-out near the end), someone else who’s darker immortal past that was glimpsed in Torchwood is comparable to hers. Again we really see the consequences the Doctor has to face. He always seems to come, defeat a villain, and then leave without focussing much on the fallout. Generally there’s not much of a problem, but every once in a while something he does has a very likely chance of leaving devastation. I think back to stories like “Resurrection of the Daleks” which had a fairly dark resolution resulting in the departure of one traumatized companion. At one point Ashildr says she’s had to live in “the world you leave behind.” And there’s some truth in her statement. Clara may give the Doctor a comforting hug at the end, but it’s not going to change that truth.
                Yeah Clara doesn’t show up until the last minute and her absence is notable but not unwelcome. It allows for a lot more great sequences between the two leads. Capaldi and Williams are fantastic in their chemistry and every time she asks that he take her with him you just want him to agree. She’d be a terrific companion and their performances really help you invest in the drama. But then again despite her age, Williams really brings a surprising gravitas to her character that eclipses the role of merely a companion. Ariyon Bakare is fine as her secret lion partner, looking a lot like Ron Perlman from Beauty and the Beast. And Rufus Hound plays basically himself in the 1600s: a lackluster comedian working in the shadow of another. That “don’t leave me hanging” joke was too painful. Though there was some good humour. The opening highwayman sequence reminds me (almost too familiarly) of a similar scene in the third series of my favourite television series Blackadder. In fact when Ashildr revels in her deep voice I’m certain writer Catherine Tregenna is paying homage to that episode. In addition to that we saw the Doctor express irritation with puns and banter, and Maisie Williams say “shut up! You’re not my dad!” It was also interesting seeing the Doctor and Arya Stark on a seventeenth century heist which was quite fine, and knowing her character from Game of Thrones, it was odd to see her dressed regally for a change.
                The ending was very hopeful too. The lion-alien is apparently on some sort of suicide mission, uses the amulet to open a portal that will kill everyone, himself and Ashildr included, allowing his species to come and invade. Ashildr realizes this is too far and she and the Doctor team up, close the portal, and save the day. Afterwards they have a very interesting conversation and while they’re on good terms, Ashildr promises that while the Doctor saves the world, she’ll be saving the world from him. Both are going to keep an eye on each other. What I love is neither is in the right or wrong, neither is evil nor good, both are understandable in deciding to watch out for the other. This series has focussed on the consequences of the Doctor’s actions and now he has someone watching over them. It’s no wonder it would make him uncomfortable, especially in seeing her grinning knowingly at him in the background of Clara’s selfie. But it means that Ashildr is sticking around which is exactly what I hoped. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Disney's Mulan, Cultural Appropriation, and Exploitation

I’m late on this one I know. I wasn’t willing to spend thirty bucks back in September for a movie experience I knew was going to be far poorer than if I had paid half that at a theatre. So I waited for it to hit streaming for free to give it a shot. In the meantime I heard that it wasn’t very good, but I remained determined not to skip it entirely, partly out of sympathy for director Niki Caro and partly out of morbid curiosity. Disney’s live-action Mulan  I was actually mildly looking forward to early in the year in spite of my well-documented distaste for this series of creative dead zones by the most powerful media conglomerate on earth. Mulan  was never one of Disney’s classics, a movie extremely of its time in its “girl power” gender politics and with a decidedly American take on ancient Chinese mythology. It got by on a couple good songs and a strong lead, but it was a movie that could be improved upon, and this new version looked like it had the potential to do that, emphasizing

The Hays Code was Bad, Sex in Movies is Good

Don't Look Now (1973) Will Hays, Who Knows About Sex In 1930, former Republican politician and chair of the Motion Picture Association of America Will Hayes introduced a series of self-censorship guidelines for the movie industry in response to a mixture of celebrity scandals and lobbying from the Catholic Church against various ‘immoralities’ creating a perception of Hollywood as corrupt and indecent. The Hays Code, or the Motion Picture Production Code, was formally adopted in 1930, though not stringently enforced until 1934 under the auspices of Joseph Breen. It laid out a careful list of what was and wasn’t acceptable for a film expecting major distribution. It stipulated rules against profanity, the depiction of miscegenation, and offensive portrayals of the clergy, but a lot of it was based around sexual content: “sexual perversion” of any kind was disallowed, as were any opaquely textual or visual allusions to reproduction, and right near the top “No licentious or suggestiv

Pixar Sundays: The Incredibles (2004)

          Brad Bird was already a master by the time he came to Pixar. Not only did he hone his craft as an early director on The Simpsons , but he directed a little animated film for Warner Bros. in 1999, that though not a box office success was loved by critics and quickly grew a cult following. The Iron Giant is now among many people’s favourite animated movies. Likewise, Bird’s feature debut at Pixar, The Incredibles , his own variation of a superhero movie, is often considered one of the studio’s best. And for very good reason, as the most talented director at Pixar shows.            Superheroes were once the world’s greatest crime-fighting force until several lawsuits for collateral damage (and in the case of Mr. Incredible, a hilarious suicide prevention), outlawed their vigilantism. Fifteen years later Mr. Incredible, now living as Bob Parr, has a family with his wife Helen, the former Elastigirl. But Bob, in a combination of mid-life crisis and nostalgia for the old day