Skip to main content

Depp Brings to Life a Mobsters Rise

                Four years ago I remember hearing in the news of the arrest of “Whitey” Bulger a notorious gangster active in the 1970s and 80s. He had been a fugitive at large for over a decade and now in his elder years had finally been caught and given two life sentences (despite only having one life to serve). The story was notable, it looked like our era’s “Eichmann in Argentina” catch, but I didn’t know much about his story and the news just slipped my mind. It came back to mind and vividly, when I went to see Black Mass starring Johnny Depp.
                Directed by Scott Cooper, Black Mass is the story of Jimmy “Whitey” Bulger’s (Depp) rise to power and how it was made possible by the FBI. Agent John Connolly (Joel Edgerton) who grew up in the same neighbourhood recruits the Irish criminal to be an informant for the FBI so they can wipe out an Italian mafia family that’s been running Boston’s organized crime scene. However Bulger soon begins to use this position of relative immunity and influence to consolidate power for his Winter Hill Gang, while at the same time Connolly walks the fine line of upstanding agent and corrupt accessory to crime.
                There’s a definite feel of colourlessness to this film, the general seediness of the focussed-on areas of Boston underline the dangerous environment we’re inhabiting. These are so convincingly rendered as the recesses of American crime and this gritty world is equally complemented by its cast of characters. This is a film characterized by some powerhouse performances. After years and years of the same awful typecasting, I’m proud to say Johnny Depp is back! It’s hard to believe this film where he is multifaceted, grippingly engaging, chillingly violent, and terrifying came out the same year as Mortdecai! It really is an Oscar calibre performance and what we’ve been waiting for from Depp for a decade! Joel Edgerton is also not to be overlooked turning out another tremendous performance, acutely capturing his character’s unknowing descent into Bulger’s grasp. There is a great ensemble around them too, including Benedict Cumberbatch as Bulger’s politician brother (though his accent could use some work), Julianne Nicholson, Dakota Johnson, Jesse Plemmons, Peter Sarsgaard, David Harbour, Rory Cochrane, Corey Stoll, Adam Scott, and Kevin Bacon! In addition to these, the film boasts solid directing and writing. The screenplay (co-written by accomplished playwright Jez Butterworth) gives the characters the intensity to keep you on edge. It should also be emphasized how well the characters interact off each other. The clashing of conscience between characters in the FBI scenes provides for some addictive drama. And of particular note is a scene between Bulger and Connolly’s wife which is so creepily magnetic, and another scene where Bulger grills FBI Agent Morris over dinner. These scenes and Depp’s portrayal amount to creating a viscerally unpredictable and dangerous character both in Bulger and the tone of the film itself.
                Black Mass is certainly one of the strongest films of the year telling a fascinating true story of a fascinating person. It’s one of the best gangster films of recent years highlighted by effective tension, a bleak tone, and not to mention two amazingly superb performances from Depp and Edgerton. The film is kept from being great due to some minor characters and plot points becoming confused if not followed closely, some sequences that drag too much, and admittedly a lack of emotional tether. It’s not going to be one of the classics of the genre. But because by and large it works so well, it’s definitely worth checking out. 
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Strange History of the American Spoof Movie

Parody movies have been around for a lot longer than we tend to think of them. Even from the earliest days of Hollywood there were movies meant to satirize a particular subject or genre. In the silent era, Buster Keaton was responsible for a few. And in the early sound era, almost as soon as the monster pictures took off did you see comic versions of them -Abbott and Costello hosting a few. But parody movies tended to be subtle for most of cinema history, or parody came in conjunction with another goal of the comedy. It really wasn’t until the 1980s and 90s that it took off and became popularly understood. And there is perhaps a line to be drawn to the counterculture comedy explosion that began in the 1970s through avenues like  Saturday Night Live , which frequently parodied from even its earliest years popular movies and cultural properties of the time. But that is still a way’s back. To my generation though, ‘parody movie’ is perhaps a less known term than the more blunt ‘s...
1 comment
Read more

A Stylish and Charmingly Reinvented David Copperfield

The Personal History, Adventures, Experience and Observation of David Copperfield the Younger of Blunderstone Rookery (Which He Never Meant to Publish on Any Account)  is the most important book Charles Dickens ever wrote. It is not the most famous or influential by any means (that would of course be A Christmas Carol ), but it is the book that is the purest expression of the authors’ style, identity, and worldview. It is his most personal work, semi-autobiographical in its story of the chronology from infancy to adulthood of a character who overcomes great loss and hardships to find a fulfilling life as a writer. To read David Copperfield  is to understand Dickens himself. Armando Iannucci knew this when he decided to make a new adaptation of the novel for a twenty-first century audience. He also knew that Dickens adaptations are ubiquitous at this point. Films are a bit rarer, but every few years a new television adaptation rears its head to keep the authors’ unique world an...
Post a Comment
Read more

Notes on the Title Cards of The Lord of the Rings

It might be sacrilege for one who both considers The Lord of the Rings  trilogy to be one of the greatest triumphs of cinema and has been an avid lover of the films since adolescence, to declare that the original theatrical cuts of the films are better than the much beloved extended editions. Easily it’s my most controversial opinion regarding these movies. Don’t get me wrong, I do like the extended editions quite a lot, especially as someone who just enjoys spending time in that universe. They flesh it out more, add extra flavour, and in increasing the length by about an hour really emphasize the epic quality of these films. But I find that the original cuts are generally more cleanly paced, more seamlessly edited, and much more accessible to audiences. All the stuff there is to love about The Lord of the Rings  is there in the original versions, the plethora of new and extended scenes merely add to that for fans. And of those, they fall into three camps for me: 1....
14 comments
Read more