Skip to main content

British Gangster Month: The Long Good Friday (1980)

            Who doesn’t love gangster films? They’re thrilling, dramatic, and often action-packed, with writing and performances that at their best can make you relate to an ensemble of violent, morally ambiguous criminals. But there’s a sub-genre of gangster movies that has its own charm, tropes, and style: the British gangster film. British gangster films (or British crime films) are more than just Goodfellas in London, but they reflect the unique culture of British organized (and unorganized) crime. Where an American gangster film commonly has a tone of drama and suspense throughout, their British equivalents often seem to employ a more darkly comic edge rounded with a cast of colourful characters (and language), intrigue, and themes that are inherently British. They give a very interesting perspective on British culture, crime, and character. And because of my fascination with this, and realization I haven’t seen enough films of this genre, each Wednesday in September I’m going to review a different British gangster film and see how they reflect their culture as well as the impact they have. Now these are going to be British gangster films so I won’t be touching on films out of Ireland some would confuse as British. In Bruges is f---ing amazing! But I’m really excited for the samples I am going to be partaking in of a fascinating and provoking genre!

                We start with what many regard as the godfather (get it!) of British gangster films, The Long Good Friday (1980). Directed by John Mackenzie, it’s certainly quite a different kind of gangster film than I’ve seen before in that it also functions as something of a mystery. That in addition to some good performances, interesting visual and editing choices, and some distinct themes and cultural characteristics make it a really decent film.
                The late great Bob Hoskins plays Harold Shand a successful gangster who is attempting to make a business deal with the American mafia to redevelop the London Docklands for use in the Olympic Games. However a series of attacks on his men and properties begin to lose him his credibility with the American boss Charlie (Eddie Constantine) provoking him to track down whoever’s responsible before he loses his deal and more.
                This is probably the most basic story of these gangster films, one that you could easily see as an episode of The Sopranos, but it works to this films’ advantage. It knows it’s not trying to tell a heavy elaborate story like The Godfather and so this kind of plot is appropriate. It’s more a film about a character, and the time, and the struggles inherent to that time. Mackenzie makes sure to keep focus on Harold and how his seemingly ideal world which he has run fairly peacefully for the past decade is beginning to crumble around him. This situation reminds me a lot of the opening to the final season of Boardwalk Empire which also dealt with a successful crime lord having to deal with the end of an era and the crux of his power being in jeopardy. I was also fascinated by some of the directorial and cinematography choices. The camera angles are clever at times forcing you to identify with the mobsters while at other times with the victims. There’s also the interesting crucifixion imagery in the film which ties into the Good Friday of the title, which is also the day the events of the film begin on. Whether this symbolizes or foreshadows Harold as a Jesus figure or something to that effect, is up to your own interpretation. It was just a curious choice to me.
                Bob Hoskins is as usual very good and a lot of fun to watch. With the focus being on his character so much, he had deliver, and he did so very well making this his breakout role. But there were times especially when he was drinking, I just couldn’t help seeing Eddie Valiant and it amused me to think if this had been his character in Who Framed Roger Rabbit? More than Hoskins though, Helen Mirren was electrifying as his wife Victoria. She wields almost as much power as him and a certain degree over him. She is very involved in the organization and is incredibly clever. For a film made in 1980 I was surprised how uninhibited the writer was to give a woman so much character and influence. Especially in a mafia movie where she’s a second protagonist. And Mirren was exquisite accentuating her character’s power and adding a welcome drop of class. P.H. Moriarty as Razors and Dave King as Parky were also pretty good. Paul Freeman, Belloq himself has a minor role as one of Harold’s goons Colin a homosexual predator. And this film has a number of cameos from yet to be well-known actors many of whom would go on to be in other films I’ll be reviewing in this series. Kevin McNally of the Pirates of the Caribbean series shows up, and Pierce Brosnan and Daragh O’Malley play a pair of hitmen.
                The Long Good Friday though it has a basic American gangster plot, is very distinctly British. This is fairly obvious in the interactions between the British and American gangsters some of which feel like the Brits purposely showing America they are different. The state of the U.K. is reflected through the film’s depiction of political and police corruption, economic problems, and the dangerous threat of the I.R.A. Harold is also not your typical crime film lead and the film goes out of its way to show him not being in control, not making rational decisions, and how all of these things could lead to his downfall. When he finds out the reason behind these attacks, it’s the perfect illustration of this lack of control. And that’s one of the important themes of this movie: consequences. He’s not able to just walk coolly away from some of the stuff he’s done, some of his responsibilities with his assets intact. A really good last minute twist hammers this in exceptionally. Gangster movies often set up their lead character as a relatable antihero and sometimes do it so well (i.e. The Godfather) that they can convince you these guys are the good guys. But The Long Good Friday isn’t going to let you do that. It does enforce how wrong these actions are and by showing the consequences, it could be seen as a warning. And this doesn’t feel like a lesson you get in many American gangster films, certainly not in American gangster culture.
                The Long Good Friday is certainly a good start to British Gangster Month presenting some different themes, interesting characters and style, and a basic but exciting story and character piece. A mob boss’s world destructing around him is still very fascinating and I think this film does it well. As inimitable a film this is though, I look forward to what the next one brings!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Strange History of the American Spoof Movie

Parody movies have been around for a lot longer than we tend to think of them. Even from the earliest days of Hollywood there were movies meant to satirize a particular subject or genre. In the silent era, Buster Keaton was responsible for a few. And in the early sound era, almost as soon as the monster pictures took off did you see comic versions of them -Abbott and Costello hosting a few. But parody movies tended to be subtle for most of cinema history, or parody came in conjunction with another goal of the comedy. It really wasn’t until the 1980s and 90s that it took off and became popularly understood. And there is perhaps a line to be drawn to the counterculture comedy explosion that began in the 1970s through avenues like  Saturday Night Live , which frequently parodied from even its earliest years popular movies and cultural properties of the time. But that is still a way’s back. To my generation though, ‘parody movie’ is perhaps a less known term than the more blunt ‘s...

Notes on the Title Cards of The Lord of the Rings

It might be sacrilege for one who both considers The Lord of the Rings  trilogy to be one of the greatest triumphs of cinema and has been an avid lover of the films since adolescence, to declare that the original theatrical cuts of the films are better than the much beloved extended editions. Easily it’s my most controversial opinion regarding these movies. Don’t get me wrong, I do like the extended editions quite a lot, especially as someone who just enjoys spending time in that universe. They flesh it out more, add extra flavour, and in increasing the length by about an hour really emphasize the epic quality of these films. But I find that the original cuts are generally more cleanly paced, more seamlessly edited, and much more accessible to audiences. All the stuff there is to love about The Lord of the Rings  is there in the original versions, the plethora of new and extended scenes merely add to that for fans. And of those, they fall into three camps for me: 1....

Back to the Feature: New York, New York (1977)

New York, New York  is a two hour forty minute musical movie largely about a toxic relationship and I understand why it was Martin Scorsese’s first big flop. Some have blamed its poor reception on the kind of movie it was, of a style and tone Scorsese wasn’t known for, but I find that hard to believe. Even after only five films, he’d proven himself an extremely versatile director, and Alice Doesn’t Live Here Anymore  found an audience. Sure this jazz musical love letter to New York City was following up Taxi Driver and its’ far more cynical take on the city, but then it’s also ‘from the director of Taxi Driver ’ which itself was a big hit. Was it a matter of public appetite for musicals, or mere word of mouth and early critical reception that dissuaded viewers? Irrespective of that, I was stunned to discover this movie was the origin of the titular song, which I’d assumed was much older (it’s definitely got the sound of something that might have come out of the Jazz sce...