Skip to main content

British Gangster Month: Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels (1998)

  
             Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels is the directorial debut of Guy Ritchie who’s gone on to make among others the Sherlock Holmes films and The Man from U.N.C.L.E.  His name has somewhat become synonymous with British gangster films because with Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels he practically reinvented the genre. He made the film eighteen years after The Long Good Friday and made it stand out by heavily stylizing it and infusing it with elements of comedy and caper films. The result is a wild and outrageous but exciting and intense triumph!
                Four friends Eddy (Nick Moran), Tom (Jason Flemying), Bacon (Jason Statham), and Soap (Dexter Fletcher), pool their money so Eddy who’s a card-shark can afford to play a game of three card brag with mob boss “Hatchet” Harry Lonsdale (P.H. Moriarty). But his enforcer Barry the Baptist (Lenny McLean aka “The Guv’nor” a real-life former criminal and boxer) rigs the game causing the boys to lose and be severely in debt to the kingpin. They are given the option to pay Harry back either in £100,000 cash or in the bar owned by Eddy’s father (Sting). Failure to do either by the week’s end and they’ll be disfigured. With selling over the bar not an option for the boys, they must come up with another way to get the money before they lose their fingers to Harry’s debt collector Big Chris (Vinnie Jones). At the same time Harry’s on the lookout for a pair of antique guns that make their own way through the London criminal underworld.
                As you may be able to guess, the plot is fairly detailed and complex, and needs to be paid attention to to make sense. There are a plethora of secondary characters and subplots from every dank corner of British crime and they can easily get muddied and confusing. Luckily the story and style is unique and alluring enough that it keeps you interested, invested, and entertained wanting to keep up with all these plot points and characters. It’s clear from early on that the subplots will come together as we see familiar faces interacting with different sects knowing it’s all going to come around. And until then it’s a lot of fun to watch these characters. The main four have defined personalities that work off each other well. They’re cunning and charming rendering them more accessible to the viewers and making them easy to root for. In addition to Guy Ritchie, the movie also introduced the world to Jason Statham, Vinnie Jones, and to a lesser extent Jason Flemying. Statham has the least to do of the four possibly due to his having no acting training, having been a professional driver previously, but he definitely sticks out for his coolness and physical distinctiveness and I can see why he was the one who became the biggest star. Jones also came straight from athletics having been a footballer, but he owns every scene he’s in through an excellent combination of brute intimidation and humour (the fact he brings his kid on most of his jobs is played very well). Flemying is delightfully charismatic as Tom and Fletcher is a lot of fun playing the awkward Soap. Moran’s Eddy isn’t particularly interesting on his own, sort of a generic leader and ideas guy. But again, the four work off each other very well that any individual character weaknesses are almost irrelevant. The large supporting cast is full of over-the-top characters each with their own quirks and eccentricities. Particularly good are Steven Mackintosh as marijuana grower Winston, Vas Blackwood as drug dealer Rory, and of course Sting as Eddy’s dad. The film even manages a couple nice cameos from former Young Sherlock Holmes Nicholas Rowe as one of Winston’s mates, and comedian Rob Brydon as a traffic warden.
                Above all though this is Guy Ritchie’s film and he does a lot to make himself known stylistically as a director. The music and sound choices, shot choices, and fast pace reflect other styles and genres but combined here give it a really unique feel. So does the colour scheme of the film which leans heavily towards golds and browns immediately transporting you into this seedy criminal environment. Clearly Richie wanted to bring something of a bizarre artistic flair and not make this just an ordinary crime film. But even though he tried hard to make it feel different, he doesn’t come off as overambitious or ostentatious because the story and his script are strong enough. The writing in this film is actually pretty clever both in story progression and dialogue which is often pretty rich, smart, fast, and funny. There are some really great jokes that range from the darkly comic to the self-deprecating, like a sequence where characters talking in cockney slang are provided with subtitles. It’s one of those screenplays I imagine on its own just reads very well. But the director, cast, and crew that brought it to life ensure that watching the film is still the better option.
                Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels is an almost perfect British gangster film. It depicts this world of British crime in a very different and energetic way. It’s not a tale of straightforward organized crime and showcases this violent and dark world in a new light, at least by North American standards. It’s got an off-the-wall style and characters, and a plot that’s part caper film, part comedy film, all gangster film. Add to that the introduction of a great director and actors, and an unabashedly catchy title and you’ve got a thoroughly amazing entry in an increasingly amazing genre.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Strange History of the American Spoof Movie

Parody movies have been around for a lot longer than we tend to think of them. Even from the earliest days of Hollywood there were movies meant to satirize a particular subject or genre. In the silent era, Buster Keaton was responsible for a few. And in the early sound era, almost as soon as the monster pictures took off did you see comic versions of them -Abbott and Costello hosting a few. But parody movies tended to be subtle for most of cinema history, or parody came in conjunction with another goal of the comedy. It really wasn’t until the 1980s and 90s that it took off and became popularly understood. And there is perhaps a line to be drawn to the counterculture comedy explosion that began in the 1970s through avenues like  Saturday Night Live , which frequently parodied from even its earliest years popular movies and cultural properties of the time. But that is still a way’s back. To my generation though, ‘parody movie’ is perhaps a less known term than the more blunt ‘s...
Post a Comment
Read more

Notes on the Title Cards of The Lord of the Rings

It might be sacrilege for one who both considers The Lord of the Rings  trilogy to be one of the greatest triumphs of cinema and has been an avid lover of the films since adolescence, to declare that the original theatrical cuts of the films are better than the much beloved extended editions. Easily it’s my most controversial opinion regarding these movies. Don’t get me wrong, I do like the extended editions quite a lot, especially as someone who just enjoys spending time in that universe. They flesh it out more, add extra flavour, and in increasing the length by about an hour really emphasize the epic quality of these films. But I find that the original cuts are generally more cleanly paced, more seamlessly edited, and much more accessible to audiences. All the stuff there is to love about The Lord of the Rings  is there in the original versions, the plethora of new and extended scenes merely add to that for fans. And of those, they fall into three camps for me: 1....
1 comment
Read more

Back to the Feature: New York, New York (1977)

New York, New York  is a two hour forty minute musical movie largely about a toxic relationship and I understand why it was Martin Scorsese’s first big flop. Some have blamed its poor reception on the kind of movie it was, of a style and tone Scorsese wasn’t known for, but I find that hard to believe. Even after only five films, he’d proven himself an extremely versatile director, and Alice Doesn’t Live Here Anymore  found an audience. Sure this jazz musical love letter to New York City was following up Taxi Driver and its’ far more cynical take on the city, but then it’s also ‘from the director of Taxi Driver ’ which itself was a big hit. Was it a matter of public appetite for musicals, or mere word of mouth and early critical reception that dissuaded viewers? Irrespective of that, I was stunned to discover this movie was the origin of the titular song, which I’d assumed was much older (it’s definitely got the sound of something that might have come out of the Jazz sce...
Post a Comment
Read more