Skip to main content

Gandalf v. Dumbledore Trailer!

               After Comic-Con everyone seems to be talking about the Batman v. Superman trailer. And while it’s a fine trailer and certainly offers a lot to talk about, I can’t believe nobody’s bringing up the other great clash of magic partially-insane heroes, and that trailer which was also released. I am of course talking about Gandalf v. Dumbledore!
                It’s the match we’ve all been waiting for! The two most powerful wizards in novels turned films are going to go up against each other and finally…finally we have a trailer! It started on such a strong note: a shot of Dumbledore’s wand in a glass case followed by one of Gandalf’s staff hitting the ground in that famed Balrog battle. Then we get the voiceover narration from Jeremy Irons explaining the set-up. Dumbledore having nothing to do after bringing Harry back to life rather than sit around that train station, went exploring. Eventually he reached a body of water where he came into contact with the ship that left the Grey Havens. Gandalf believes he may be Saruman or some sorcerer in disguise while Dumbledore believes himself to be in some wizard purgatory. There’s some comic relief dialogue where they compare the lengths of their beards in a suggestive way. Then we see that at some point the ship reaches land. Galadriel looks into Dumbledore’s mind and we see footage from the Harry Potter series. She shares her insight with Gandalf through a small portable equivalent of her mirror. Gandalf notes that Dumbledore appeared as a different person in a couple of the older visions leading him to confirm the Headmaster of Hogwarts is indeed Saruman in disguise having escaped Isengard and has been poisoning the minds of children who believe they can become wizards. He confronts Dumbledore with this information but Dumbledore denies it believing this to be some kind of test. He tells Gandalf he ran a school for young wizards and witches but Gandalf stresses that mortals cannot be wizards. Incensed due to his pride in his students, Dumbledore rebukes Gandalf demanding to know where he is. There’s also a joke about why three on their ship have had cosmetic ear surgery. This leads to a two-way interrogation that we don’t see a whole lot of, but we know ends with Gandalf confessing his immortality and Dumbledore asking “prove it.” Epic music plays and we see a montage of images like Gandalf wandering confused and bruised across a desert, Dumbledore having ‘nam flashbacks of Snape killing him, lightning striking the ship, narration about what makes a hero from an unseen cynical villain, a shot of fetus Voldemort standing up smiling, the Wizard of Oz getting caught up in the fracas, more Jesus imagery for both combatants, and then finally quick-cut shots of both characters with the voiceover: “Each ended a war…to start their own!” Dumbledore’s wand shoots a green beam, Gandalf’s staff a white light which flashes out the scene. Finally we see them staring at each other across a chasm. Dumbledore epically takes his glasses off. Shit just got real! They charge at each other, we get another flash, and the title card: GANDALF V. DUMBLEDORE: MIGHT OF MAGIC! But it’s not over yet as we get a glimpse of the two wizards pausing in their battle as they hear a roar. “What was that?” shouts Dumbledore. Gandalf replies “that…was a lion!”
                Describing this trailer isn’t enough, it must be seen to be believed! It certainly has me hyped, much more so than the Batman v. Superman trailer does or anything else at Comic-Con. Hell I’ll say it! This even beats Star Wars: The Force Awakens! Hopefully it’ll be put online soon along with the trailers for Suicide Squad and The Hateful Eight. Having the whole cast and director Alexander Payne come out for a Q&A was just icing on the cake! This is gonna be big; people have been split over this mash-up for ages. I can’t wait to go see it when it hits theatres sometime next year and find out who will win!
It’ll be Gandalf. We all know it’ll be Gandalf.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Strange History of the American Spoof Movie

Parody movies have been around for a lot longer than we tend to think of them. Even from the earliest days of Hollywood there were movies meant to satirize a particular subject or genre. In the silent era, Buster Keaton was responsible for a few. And in the early sound era, almost as soon as the monster pictures took off did you see comic versions of them -Abbott and Costello hosting a few. But parody movies tended to be subtle for most of cinema history, or parody came in conjunction with another goal of the comedy. It really wasn’t until the 1980s and 90s that it took off and became popularly understood. And there is perhaps a line to be drawn to the counterculture comedy explosion that began in the 1970s through avenues like  Saturday Night Live , which frequently parodied from even its earliest years popular movies and cultural properties of the time. But that is still a way’s back. To my generation though, ‘parody movie’ is perhaps a less known term than the more blunt ‘s...
Post a Comment
Read more

Notes on the Title Cards of The Lord of the Rings

It might be sacrilege for one who both considers The Lord of the Rings  trilogy to be one of the greatest triumphs of cinema and has been an avid lover of the films since adolescence, to declare that the original theatrical cuts of the films are better than the much beloved extended editions. Easily it’s my most controversial opinion regarding these movies. Don’t get me wrong, I do like the extended editions quite a lot, especially as someone who just enjoys spending time in that universe. They flesh it out more, add extra flavour, and in increasing the length by about an hour really emphasize the epic quality of these films. But I find that the original cuts are generally more cleanly paced, more seamlessly edited, and much more accessible to audiences. All the stuff there is to love about The Lord of the Rings  is there in the original versions, the plethora of new and extended scenes merely add to that for fans. And of those, they fall into three camps for me: 1....
1 comment
Read more

Back to the Feature: New York, New York (1977)

New York, New York  is a two hour forty minute musical movie largely about a toxic relationship and I understand why it was Martin Scorsese’s first big flop. Some have blamed its poor reception on the kind of movie it was, of a style and tone Scorsese wasn’t known for, but I find that hard to believe. Even after only five films, he’d proven himself an extremely versatile director, and Alice Doesn’t Live Here Anymore  found an audience. Sure this jazz musical love letter to New York City was following up Taxi Driver and its’ far more cynical take on the city, but then it’s also ‘from the director of Taxi Driver ’ which itself was a big hit. Was it a matter of public appetite for musicals, or mere word of mouth and early critical reception that dissuaded viewers? Irrespective of that, I was stunned to discover this movie was the origin of the titular song, which I’d assumed was much older (it’s definitely got the sound of something that might have come out of the Jazz sce...
Post a Comment
Read more