Skip to main content

Back to the Feature: All Quiet on the Western Front (1930)

“And our bodies are earth. And our thoughts are clay. And we sleep and eat with death.”
                A Variety article characterized Lewis Milestone’s All Quiet on the Western Front as a film that should be mass-produced and reprinted in every language until the concept of war ceased to exist in the world. Which is a pretty big declaration for a film made prior to most of the past century’s most terrible wars. But at the same time, the explicitness of its anti-war message and effectiveness at conveying that message make it even more relevant today because of those many terrible wars that have illustrated how important this film is.
                The film based on Erich Maria Remarque’s novel is about a bunch of eager young men in Germany at the outset of the First World War. They enlist in the prospect of glory and heroism only to be exposed to the reality and terrors of the war. Primarily the story follows Paul Baumer (Lew Ayres) and his personal experiences and tribulations as he endures harsh conditions, friends and companions dying around him, and losing hope and understanding in the world. And so the film follows the narrative of the war which is that of excitement and hope followed by mass slaughter and trauma.
                One thing that strikes me instantly in All Quiet on the Western Front is that it sticks to the source material’s German leads. It would have been easy and typical for Hollywood back then to transition the story into an American setting with American heroes. And while these Germans are very Americanized it’s still a pleasant surprise that they were bold enough to humanize the enemy only twelve years after the war ended. It shows audiences that these feelings about the war and what it did to people was universal regardless of which side you were on. And while if this film had been made a few years later, I doubt the Germans would have been portrayed so sympathetically (what with you know, Hitler being around), it still strikes me as very open-minded and honest for its time. Another thing to really appreciate about this film is that it was made before the Hays Production Code took effect allowing the violence of war to be portrayed with a much better sense of realism and dreariness. It’s one of the last times before the 1960s that this level of gritty imagery of war is seen. The films feels legitimate when we see people losing limbs, getting injuries, blood appearing with the bodies on the battlefields and helps the viewer experience the horrors as the characters do.
                The film really employs the ideology and honesty about the war in a number of interesting scenes. One of my favourites is when the group are gathered around discussing why they’re fighting in a half-serious manner. It’s hard to believe those kind of conversations didn’t take place for the average tommies many unaware of the nature of the war’s beginnings, or alternatively in full understanding of how ridiculous it was. The older mentor figure of their group Kat (Louis Wolheim, there are a lot of Louis’ in this film!) ends it by giving a comparatively sound alternative to letting millions die over a dumb conflict. The price of war gets plenty of exposure,, no better than in the church-hospital scene where Paul’s trying to comfort a dying man while a friend tries to get his good boots them being such a rare commodity. I feel like for the first time, people who didn’t experience the war were getting an idea of how horrific it was in these scenes, and with a notable death scene later on even more so. There’s a scene where their training instructor arrives at the front and finds the respect to rank has broken down in the anarchy of the trenches, showing the meaningless of the chain of command when all boils down. At one point Paul winds up abandoned in No Man’s Land with an enemy French soldier who he tries to keep alive despite having shot him in the first place. Ayres really sells the lamentation and it’s so effective that similar scenes have been enacted in many war films since. They’re the kind of scenes beyond the comprehension of Professor Kantorek blissfully unaware of the true nature of war but endlessly promoting it for its glory and majesty. After the almost satiric but sadly ironic scene at the beginning, we eventually get to a point where Paul confronts him and it’s just awesome as he does all to discredit him and discourage the students from believing his bullshit. It’s slightly preachy but by this point we’ve seen enough to be firmly on his side. And all of these in addition to the final couple scenes are just beautiful.
                Speaking of beauty, the shots in this film are wonderful. They’re so great and realistic, I wonder if they fooled me by inserting actual footage from the war. But we still see our characters in some of these shots so it’s still really impressive. And for a film made in 1930 it’s all the more amazing. This was one of the earliest talkies so the music and dialogue synching is a little noticeably off but the editing and cinematography which looks better than a lot of films today more than make up for that. And while the film can be accused of being driven by its message, it has a really decent story backing it up, well-written and complete with great characters. There are admittedly a number of nameless figures but the three or four characters you get know in their misery grow on you. Kat in particular, his cynicism and insights as well as intelligence and guidance make him immediately likable. And being a war film it’s very important to create likable relatable characters for the audience to latch onto but also like in any war film be careful about getting attached. Though that is actually an important part of the experience.
                All Quiet on the Western Front is certainly one of the greatest war films ever made if not the best. It’s attention to capturing the reality of war in vivid detail creates one of the most profoundly effective anti-war messages ever. It turned Lew Ayres into conscientious objector during the Second World War which was almost Hollywood suicide at the time. And for him to be pushed to do that based on a film is incredibly telling of the power of the medium. What it accomplished for its time is a marvel and is as relevant today as it ever was. Which is unfortunate. This is one of those films that really has the power to change the world and that Variety article hoped it would. The fact that we’ve had many terrible wars since this film shows we may not have been listening. And whether it has the power to end such an awful thing or not, it wouldn’t hurt to watch All Quiet on the Western Front every so often as a reminder, a testament to the millions of lost souls, and a warning.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Disney's Mulan, Cultural Appropriation, and Exploitation

I’m late on this one I know. I wasn’t willing to spend thirty bucks back in September for a movie experience I knew was going to be far poorer than if I had paid half that at a theatre. So I waited for it to hit streaming for free to give it a shot. In the meantime I heard that it wasn’t very good, but I remained determined not to skip it entirely, partly out of sympathy for director Niki Caro and partly out of morbid curiosity. Disney’s live-action Mulan  I was actually mildly looking forward to early in the year in spite of my well-documented distaste for this series of creative dead zones by the most powerful media conglomerate on earth. Mulan  was never one of Disney’s classics, a movie extremely of its time in its “girl power” gender politics and with a decidedly American take on ancient Chinese mythology. It got by on a couple good songs and a strong lead, but it was a movie that could be improved upon, and this new version looked like it had the potential to do that, emphasizing

The Hays Code was Bad, Sex in Movies is Good

Don't Look Now (1973) Will Hays, Who Knows About Sex In 1930, former Republican politician and chair of the Motion Picture Association of America Will Hayes introduced a series of self-censorship guidelines for the movie industry in response to a mixture of celebrity scandals and lobbying from the Catholic Church against various ‘immoralities’ creating a perception of Hollywood as corrupt and indecent. The Hays Code, or the Motion Picture Production Code, was formally adopted in 1930, though not stringently enforced until 1934 under the auspices of Joseph Breen. It laid out a careful list of what was and wasn’t acceptable for a film expecting major distribution. It stipulated rules against profanity, the depiction of miscegenation, and offensive portrayals of the clergy, but a lot of it was based around sexual content: “sexual perversion” of any kind was disallowed, as were any opaquely textual or visual allusions to reproduction, and right near the top “No licentious or suggestiv

Pixar Sundays: The Incredibles (2004)

          Brad Bird was already a master by the time he came to Pixar. Not only did he hone his craft as an early director on The Simpsons , but he directed a little animated film for Warner Bros. in 1999, that though not a box office success was loved by critics and quickly grew a cult following. The Iron Giant is now among many people’s favourite animated movies. Likewise, Bird’s feature debut at Pixar, The Incredibles , his own variation of a superhero movie, is often considered one of the studio’s best. And for very good reason, as the most talented director at Pixar shows.            Superheroes were once the world’s greatest crime-fighting force until several lawsuits for collateral damage (and in the case of Mr. Incredible, a hilarious suicide prevention), outlawed their vigilantism. Fifteen years later Mr. Incredible, now living as Bob Parr, has a family with his wife Helen, the former Elastigirl. But Bob, in a combination of mid-life crisis and nostalgia for the old day