Skip to main content

What Happened to Comic Strips?

Did you read that Garfield comic on Thursday? Of course you didn’t. You didn’t even know Garfield was still running did you?
What ever happened to comic strips? Cartoons running in newspapers in what used to be called the “funny pages” while once a fairly popular art form, are now struggling to be acknowledged as even still existing.
In some form or other comic strips have been around for over a century. The form hit its stride in the 40s and 50s when entertainment innovations like television were in their earliest years. Comedy wasn’t as accessible on a regular basis and cartoons even less. So newspapers carrying little episodic and sometimes serialized cartoons daily was a big deal and large numbers of people would read and enjoy them. But damn artistic and technological innovations!
Who’d want to read the funnies when they can get their laughs from film, television, and other mediums? People weren’t talking about comic strips anymore so some just ended their run, a number continued without as much effort, and some new ones vainly tried to make an impression. Now in the age of smartphones and the internet, once funny strips like Beetle Bailey are no longer entertaining and even the art quality has gone down. Hagar the Horrible I doubt was ever funny. Because cartoonists know they aren’t being read anymore. It also doesn’t help that so many comic strips outstay their welcome for decades more than even The Simpsons. Even when the original cartoonist dies, a number of strips are picked up by a relative or writing partner. Most of them should really just end! There’s not much of a serialization factor anymore with the end of more serious strips like Dick Tracy, and we can all be entertained better through movies, TV, and the internet.
Then why are comic strips still running? Well something needs to fill up an extra page of newspaper. But there is also a possibility for creativity and even success. There have been a couple examples in the history of the art that have really had an effect on the reception of comic strips as well as the opportunities of the three to four panel form. Charles Schulz’s Peanuts captured the America of the time with a wholesome innocence that despite being irritable at times, created a world and characters with a charm and relatability that’s instantly and strangely timeless. It invigorated comic strips and was the only one to successfully make the transition to other forms of media with a series of television holiday specials. Their Christmas and Halloween ones for example have become classics, which is more than can be said for any other comic strip that’s tried to tackle the small screen (or big screen. Remember that godawful Garfield movie?).
And then in the 80s when Peanuts had worn its popularity in print and many others were in a rut, a new strip breathed life into the funny pages: Bill Watterson’s Calvin & Hobbes. Calvin & Hobbes did everything right: more than any other strip it combined great comedy and great artwork flawlessly, it created and nurtured a sense of wonder and imagination, Watterson kept creative control without selling rights off avoiding any cheapening of his work, and he only ran the strip for ten years not overstaying his welcome and going out with the strip as good as ever! Not surprisingly every cartoonist’s wanted to be Watterson and have their own Calvin & Hobbes since the 90s. As the documentary Dear Mr. Watterson shows, many were even inspired by just this particular strip. It gave rise to a focus on creativity rather than just stock characters, bad jokes, and simplistic artwork.
And it hasn’t had an entirely negative effect. Not all of them work, certainly not the mere Calvin & Hobbes imitators, but newer strips do have some pretty good artwork and the jokes aren’t always terrible either. Some like Sherman’s Lagoon and Pearls Before Swine are even kind of impressively edgy for publicly published cartoons. And despite what I’ve been saying about older strips being unfunny and out of touch, Blondie still manages to be entertaining every so often. And maybe syndicates are thinking the same thing, and that’s why comics are still running in papers despite not having a large readership. But that’s just speculation. What I do know is that for every tired old strip that should just die and every effortless new one (which do make you question how someone is getting paid to write them), there are a few good ones out there even worth checking out online. And if that doesn’t work, there are still plenty of Calvin & Hobbes collections out there to peruse.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Disney's Mulan, Cultural Appropriation, and Exploitation

I’m late on this one I know. I wasn’t willing to spend thirty bucks back in September for a movie experience I knew was going to be far poorer than if I had paid half that at a theatre. So I waited for it to hit streaming for free to give it a shot. In the meantime I heard that it wasn’t very good, but I remained determined not to skip it entirely, partly out of sympathy for director Niki Caro and partly out of morbid curiosity. Disney’s live-action Mulan  I was actually mildly looking forward to early in the year in spite of my well-documented distaste for this series of creative dead zones by the most powerful media conglomerate on earth. Mulan  was never one of Disney’s classics, a movie extremely of its time in its “girl power” gender politics and with a decidedly American take on ancient Chinese mythology. It got by on a couple good songs and a strong lead, but it was a movie that could be improved upon, and this new version looked like it had the potential to do that, emphasizing

The Hays Code was Bad, Sex in Movies is Good

Don't Look Now (1973) Will Hays, Who Knows About Sex In 1930, former Republican politician and chair of the Motion Picture Association of America Will Hayes introduced a series of self-censorship guidelines for the movie industry in response to a mixture of celebrity scandals and lobbying from the Catholic Church against various ‘immoralities’ creating a perception of Hollywood as corrupt and indecent. The Hays Code, or the Motion Picture Production Code, was formally adopted in 1930, though not stringently enforced until 1934 under the auspices of Joseph Breen. It laid out a careful list of what was and wasn’t acceptable for a film expecting major distribution. It stipulated rules against profanity, the depiction of miscegenation, and offensive portrayals of the clergy, but a lot of it was based around sexual content: “sexual perversion” of any kind was disallowed, as were any opaquely textual or visual allusions to reproduction, and right near the top “No licentious or suggestiv

Pixar Sundays: The Incredibles (2004)

          Brad Bird was already a master by the time he came to Pixar. Not only did he hone his craft as an early director on The Simpsons , but he directed a little animated film for Warner Bros. in 1999, that though not a box office success was loved by critics and quickly grew a cult following. The Iron Giant is now among many people’s favourite animated movies. Likewise, Bird’s feature debut at Pixar, The Incredibles , his own variation of a superhero movie, is often considered one of the studio’s best. And for very good reason, as the most talented director at Pixar shows.            Superheroes were once the world’s greatest crime-fighting force until several lawsuits for collateral damage (and in the case of Mr. Incredible, a hilarious suicide prevention), outlawed their vigilantism. Fifteen years later Mr. Incredible, now living as Bob Parr, has a family with his wife Helen, the former Elastigirl. But Bob, in a combination of mid-life crisis and nostalgia for the old day