Skip to main content

What Happened to Comic Strips?

Did you read that Garfield comic on Thursday? Of course you didn’t. You didn’t even know Garfield was still running did you?
What ever happened to comic strips? Cartoons running in newspapers in what used to be called the “funny pages” while once a fairly popular art form, are now struggling to be acknowledged as even still existing.
In some form or other comic strips have been around for over a century. The form hit its stride in the 40s and 50s when entertainment innovations like television were in their earliest years. Comedy wasn’t as accessible on a regular basis and cartoons even less. So newspapers carrying little episodic and sometimes serialized cartoons daily was a big deal and large numbers of people would read and enjoy them. But damn artistic and technological innovations!
Who’d want to read the funnies when they can get their laughs from film, television, and other mediums? People weren’t talking about comic strips anymore so some just ended their run, a number continued without as much effort, and some new ones vainly tried to make an impression. Now in the age of smartphones and the internet, once funny strips like Beetle Bailey are no longer entertaining and even the art quality has gone down. Hagar the Horrible I doubt was ever funny. Because cartoonists know they aren’t being read anymore. It also doesn’t help that so many comic strips outstay their welcome for decades more than even The Simpsons. Even when the original cartoonist dies, a number of strips are picked up by a relative or writing partner. Most of them should really just end! There’s not much of a serialization factor anymore with the end of more serious strips like Dick Tracy, and we can all be entertained better through movies, TV, and the internet.
Then why are comic strips still running? Well something needs to fill up an extra page of newspaper. But there is also a possibility for creativity and even success. There have been a couple examples in the history of the art that have really had an effect on the reception of comic strips as well as the opportunities of the three to four panel form. Charles Schulz’s Peanuts captured the America of the time with a wholesome innocence that despite being irritable at times, created a world and characters with a charm and relatability that’s instantly and strangely timeless. It invigorated comic strips and was the only one to successfully make the transition to other forms of media with a series of television holiday specials. Their Christmas and Halloween ones for example have become classics, which is more than can be said for any other comic strip that’s tried to tackle the small screen (or big screen. Remember that godawful Garfield movie?).
And then in the 80s when Peanuts had worn its popularity in print and many others were in a rut, a new strip breathed life into the funny pages: Bill Watterson’s Calvin & Hobbes. Calvin & Hobbes did everything right: more than any other strip it combined great comedy and great artwork flawlessly, it created and nurtured a sense of wonder and imagination, Watterson kept creative control without selling rights off avoiding any cheapening of his work, and he only ran the strip for ten years not overstaying his welcome and going out with the strip as good as ever! Not surprisingly every cartoonist’s wanted to be Watterson and have their own Calvin & Hobbes since the 90s. As the documentary Dear Mr. Watterson shows, many were even inspired by just this particular strip. It gave rise to a focus on creativity rather than just stock characters, bad jokes, and simplistic artwork.
And it hasn’t had an entirely negative effect. Not all of them work, certainly not the mere Calvin & Hobbes imitators, but newer strips do have some pretty good artwork and the jokes aren’t always terrible either. Some like Sherman’s Lagoon and Pearls Before Swine are even kind of impressively edgy for publicly published cartoons. And despite what I’ve been saying about older strips being unfunny and out of touch, Blondie still manages to be entertaining every so often. And maybe syndicates are thinking the same thing, and that’s why comics are still running in papers despite not having a large readership. But that’s just speculation. What I do know is that for every tired old strip that should just die and every effortless new one (which do make you question how someone is getting paid to write them), there are a few good ones out there even worth checking out online. And if that doesn’t work, there are still plenty of Calvin & Hobbes collections out there to peruse.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Notes on the Title Cards of The Lord of the Rings

It might be sacrilege for one who both considers The Lord of the Rings  trilogy to be one of the greatest triumphs of cinema and has been an avid lover of the films since adolescence, to declare that the original theatrical cuts of the films are better than the much beloved extended editions. Easily it’s my most controversial opinion regarding these movies. Don’t get me wrong, I do like the extended editions quite a lot, especially as someone who just enjoys spending time in that universe. They flesh it out more, add extra flavour, and in increasing the length by about an hour really emphasize the epic quality of these films. But I find that the original cuts are generally more cleanly paced, more seamlessly edited, and much more accessible to audiences. All the stuff there is to love about The Lord of the Rings  is there in the original versions, the plethora of new and extended scenes merely add to that for fans. And of those, they fall into three camps for me: 1....
Post a Comment
Read more

The Subtle Sensitivity of the Cinema of Wong Kar-wai

When I think of Wong Kar-wai, I think of nighttime and neon lights, I think of the image of lonely people sitting in cafes or bars as the world passes behind them, mere flashes of movement; I think of love and quiet, sombre heartbreak, the sensuality that exists between people but is rarely fully or openly expressed. Mostly I think of the mood of melancholy, yet how this can be beautiful, colourful, inspiring even. A feeling of gloominess at the complexity of messy human relationships, though tinged with an unmitigated joy in the sensation of that feeling. And a warmth, generated by light and colour, that cuts through to the solitude of our very soul. This isn’t a broadly definitive quality of Wong’s body of work -certainly it isn’t so much true of his martial arts films Ashes of Time  and The Grandmaster. But those most affectionate movies on my memory: Chungking Express , Fallen Angels , Happy Together , 2046 , of course  In the Mood for Love , and even My Blueberry Nig...
1 comment
Read more

The Prince of Egypt: The Humanized Exodus

Moses and the story of the Exodus is one of the most influential mythologies of world history. It’s a centrepoint of the Abrahamic religions, and has directly influenced the society, culture, values, and laws of many civilizations. Not to mention, it’s a very powerful story, and one that unsurprisingly continues to resonate incredibly across the globe. In western culture, the story of Moses has been retold dozens of times in various mediums, most recognizably in the last century through film. And these adaptations have ranged from the iconic: Cecil B. DeMille’s The Ten Commandments;  to the infamous: Ridley Scott’s Exodus: Gods and Kings . But everyone seems to forget the one movie between those two that I’d argue has them both beat. As perhaps the best telling of one of the most influential stories of all time, I feel people don’t talk about The Prince of Egypt  nearly enough. The 1998 animated epic from DreamWorks is a breathtakingly stunning, concise but compelling, ...
1 comment
Read more