Skip to main content

Inside Out: Pixar’s Triumphant Comeback!

Pixar’s back! I mean really back! The studio’s been in a bit of a slump the last five years with Cars 2, Brave, and Monsters University being fairly disappointing, and with a slate of sequels coming it felt like the once most original animation studio had lost its way.
Well Inside Out is here to remind us it hasn’t! The film is set in the mind of Riley an eleven year old girl and her anthropomorphic emotions in control of her attitude and mindset. Led by Joy (Amy Poehler) who’s always bright, perky, and optimistic, they’re determined to keep Riley happy. Something that’s not easy when her family moves from Minnesota to San Francisco. All of her memories are contained within little colour-coded orbs and special attention is given to the core memories (all joyful of course). But Sadness (Phyllis Smith) seemingly infects one and in the confusion to set it right, she and Joy end up stranded in Riley’s mind leaving only Anger (Lewis Black), Fear (Bill Hader), and Disgust (Mindy Kaling) to run things!
 This film is ridiculously clever and creative! The way the world of the mind is portrayed, how it works, and its various cogs are ingenious but simplistic enough for anyone to understand. There are whole worlds, databanks, and environments we see in this mind that are incredibly new and make perfect sense. Like DreamLand being Hollywood with dreams projected as films. And the animation on it all looks tremendous even in 3D! The main characters are all concepts making the film very symbolic in its ideas, some obvious and some more subtle. Some even just work as jokes which usually hit big. It raises some significant concepts and themes that beg to be delved into and moralistically succeeds big time! 
  The characters work tremendously too. The casting overall is great (there is literally no one more perfect as the personification of anger than Lewis Black!). The film could have gotten away with making these characters purely concepts, but they went further especially with Joy and Sadness who in their relationship with Riley make up the emotional backbone of the movie, creating heartwarming and tear-jerking moments. And there’s a subtle focus on the relationship between these two extremes that really pays off! The only one who doesn’t work sometimes is Disgust, probably because she’s a much more specific emotion than any of the others. But really that’s just a minor gripe.
     Inside Out is engaging, emotional, intelligent, creative, clever, visually enticing, amazingly written, thought provoking, and effective in its ideas for viewers of any age. It's a perfect Pixar film, certainly the studio's best since Finding Nemo, and you'll be doing yourself a great disservice by not seeing and experiencing it! 
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Strange History of the American Spoof Movie

Parody movies have been around for a lot longer than we tend to think of them. Even from the earliest days of Hollywood there were movies meant to satirize a particular subject or genre. In the silent era, Buster Keaton was responsible for a few. And in the early sound era, almost as soon as the monster pictures took off did you see comic versions of them -Abbott and Costello hosting a few. But parody movies tended to be subtle for most of cinema history, or parody came in conjunction with another goal of the comedy. It really wasn’t until the 1980s and 90s that it took off and became popularly understood. And there is perhaps a line to be drawn to the counterculture comedy explosion that began in the 1970s through avenues like  Saturday Night Live , which frequently parodied from even its earliest years popular movies and cultural properties of the time. But that is still a way’s back. To my generation though, ‘parody movie’ is perhaps a less known term than the more blunt ‘s...
Post a Comment
Read more

Notes on the Title Cards of The Lord of the Rings

It might be sacrilege for one who both considers The Lord of the Rings  trilogy to be one of the greatest triumphs of cinema and has been an avid lover of the films since adolescence, to declare that the original theatrical cuts of the films are better than the much beloved extended editions. Easily it’s my most controversial opinion regarding these movies. Don’t get me wrong, I do like the extended editions quite a lot, especially as someone who just enjoys spending time in that universe. They flesh it out more, add extra flavour, and in increasing the length by about an hour really emphasize the epic quality of these films. But I find that the original cuts are generally more cleanly paced, more seamlessly edited, and much more accessible to audiences. All the stuff there is to love about The Lord of the Rings  is there in the original versions, the plethora of new and extended scenes merely add to that for fans. And of those, they fall into three camps for me: 1....
1 comment
Read more

Back to the Feature: New York, New York (1977)

New York, New York  is a two hour forty minute musical movie largely about a toxic relationship and I understand why it was Martin Scorsese’s first big flop. Some have blamed its poor reception on the kind of movie it was, of a style and tone Scorsese wasn’t known for, but I find that hard to believe. Even after only five films, he’d proven himself an extremely versatile director, and Alice Doesn’t Live Here Anymore  found an audience. Sure this jazz musical love letter to New York City was following up Taxi Driver and its’ far more cynical take on the city, but then it’s also ‘from the director of Taxi Driver ’ which itself was a big hit. Was it a matter of public appetite for musicals, or mere word of mouth and early critical reception that dissuaded viewers? Irrespective of that, I was stunned to discover this movie was the origin of the titular song, which I’d assumed was much older (it’s definitely got the sound of something that might have come out of the Jazz sce...
Post a Comment
Read more