Skip to main content

The End of an Era: Good Night Dave!

David Letterman went off the air last night after thirty-five years as a talk show host. And many may not realize it but it is an important shift in television history. From 1982-1993 he hosted the first incarnation of Late Night on NBC developed especially for him as a follow-up to Johnny Carson’s Tonight Show. Since 1993 he has hosted The Late Show on CBS. And yeah his show has been fairly generic as of late but still every so often boasted better writing, interviews, and jokes than the Jimmys for example. And his sense of humour was really terrific especially back in the day. It’s what got him a number of guest-hosting gigs on the Tonight Show before his own started and there his wise-cracking and self-deprecating style developed into something fairly unique. He also like Carson, took risks at his show pulling off various random stunts and comedy bits, idiosyncratic segments some getting him in trouble, like jokingly interrupting another NBC show in the middle of their broadcast. And that kind of stuff was pretty bold and edgy. And he maintained a spark of that cutting edge into his CBS years doing things and ideas no other show would think of. He had a great rapport with guests, never looking like he needed a script, being friendly but at the same time grating when necessary bringing celebrities out of their comfort zones. One thing we wouldn’t have had without him are top ten lists, which he popularized and were more than anything else his lasting contribution. We make them all the time (you may have seen a few of mine) and the idea we won’t be able to hear ten random jokes a night if we choose will take some getting used to. Cracked.com notes that he basically created youtube: https://youtu.be/ULGPklAhqC8. His show’s also the reason most know the greatness of Paul Shaffer, partner-in-crime to Letterman for most of his run. His show also was an early stepping stone for a number of great writers and comedians including Chris Elliott, Will Forte, Spike Ferestein, and Dino Stamatopoulos who helped him make television history over the years. After watching that montage in that final episode to Foo Fighters’ “Everlong”, it actually looks like a lot of fun was had.
But I think the saddest thing about Letterman leaving is he was the last connection to that holy grail of late night variety: Johnny Carson! Carson who pretty much invented the talk show and whose sharpness, hilarity, and just chatty fun-loving nature outdid almost every late night host to come after him. And Letterman WAS Carson’s successor despite the disputes with NBC and Jay Leno. Now there are a number of 12:30 talk shows, most unnecessary. The only reason that slot opened was because Johnny and the network liked Dave enough. He was his mentor and a lot of his influence was seen in Letterman right up to the end capturing that essence a little better than any of his competitors. Before he died in the mid-2000s Carson even wrote jokes for him! And so that loss is very much felt. The final tie to that Carson era of variety television is broken. David Letterman had a show three years longer than his great mentor and now the landscape of television has changed. In addition to the departure of the amazing Craig Ferguson, it feels like American late night has lost some vital limbs. I like Stephen Colbert so I’m interested in how he’ll turn out, and Conan O’Brien has always been pretty decent, but apart from that there’s nothing worth watching in American talk shows. Without the legacy of David Letterman it’s just recycled bits, poor jokes, scripted interviews, and a lot of unintentional Stupid Human Tricks!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Strange History of the American Spoof Movie

Parody movies have been around for a lot longer than we tend to think of them. Even from the earliest days of Hollywood there were movies meant to satirize a particular subject or genre. In the silent era, Buster Keaton was responsible for a few. And in the early sound era, almost as soon as the monster pictures took off did you see comic versions of them -Abbott and Costello hosting a few. But parody movies tended to be subtle for most of cinema history, or parody came in conjunction with another goal of the comedy. It really wasn’t until the 1980s and 90s that it took off and became popularly understood. And there is perhaps a line to be drawn to the counterculture comedy explosion that began in the 1970s through avenues like  Saturday Night Live , which frequently parodied from even its earliest years popular movies and cultural properties of the time. But that is still a way’s back. To my generation though, ‘parody movie’ is perhaps a less known term than the more blunt ‘s...

Notes on the Title Cards of The Lord of the Rings

It might be sacrilege for one who both considers The Lord of the Rings  trilogy to be one of the greatest triumphs of cinema and has been an avid lover of the films since adolescence, to declare that the original theatrical cuts of the films are better than the much beloved extended editions. Easily it’s my most controversial opinion regarding these movies. Don’t get me wrong, I do like the extended editions quite a lot, especially as someone who just enjoys spending time in that universe. They flesh it out more, add extra flavour, and in increasing the length by about an hour really emphasize the epic quality of these films. But I find that the original cuts are generally more cleanly paced, more seamlessly edited, and much more accessible to audiences. All the stuff there is to love about The Lord of the Rings  is there in the original versions, the plethora of new and extended scenes merely add to that for fans. And of those, they fall into three camps for me: 1....

Back to the Feature: New York, New York (1977)

New York, New York  is a two hour forty minute musical movie largely about a toxic relationship and I understand why it was Martin Scorsese’s first big flop. Some have blamed its poor reception on the kind of movie it was, of a style and tone Scorsese wasn’t known for, but I find that hard to believe. Even after only five films, he’d proven himself an extremely versatile director, and Alice Doesn’t Live Here Anymore  found an audience. Sure this jazz musical love letter to New York City was following up Taxi Driver and its’ far more cynical take on the city, but then it’s also ‘from the director of Taxi Driver ’ which itself was a big hit. Was it a matter of public appetite for musicals, or mere word of mouth and early critical reception that dissuaded viewers? Irrespective of that, I was stunned to discover this movie was the origin of the titular song, which I’d assumed was much older (it’s definitely got the sound of something that might have come out of the Jazz sce...