Skip to main content

All Aboard the World of Tomorrow!: Tomorrowland Review

                Disney’s Tomorrowland may be the most hyped movie of the year that no one really knew what to expect. It’s not a sequel, remake, or reimagining, rather it’s an original sci-fi concept, a rarity in the modern summer blockbuster season.
                The plot for what little can be revealed without spoiling, concerns a teenage girl Casey Newton (Britt Robertson) a curious and imaginative almost-prodigy who discovers a strange pin that transports her to a utopian futuristic society every time she touches it. Finding out it’s a real place called Tomorrowland she sets out to find it with a younger girl from there, Athena (Raffey Cassidy). They also team up with a former child inventor Frank Walker (George Clooney) who has a connection to Athena and Tomorrowland from his own childhood in the 60’s and believes Casey may be able to save it.
There is quite a bit to admire about this movie, so first I’m going to get to its problems. For all its originality there are a lot of plot points that are fairly formulaic. The chosen one saving the world trope is an old one and there really isn’t much of a new spin on it here. I also think the film would have benefitted from showing Tomorrowland more even though I get why they didn’t do that. And the film does lose momentum in the final act with some rushed exposition, a shift in focus to the film’s message having been a subtle cautionary warning to being hammered to death, leading to a clichéd resolution that may cause more than a few groans. It’s not terrible, nor as painfully distracting as say Into the Woods’ final act, but compared to everything that came before, it feels a little cheap and preachy. The theme of dreaming and following dreams is extrapolated far too much and despite being a good message, it can’t be supported in this day and age without practical effort. They talk about perseverance to achieve dreams and create a better world, but we don’t see that effort in effect and in such a rich climate of creativity as this film is, that kind of dedication and revelation is needed. For a film that’s really about making the future, we don’t see a lot of the making. It’s on occasions like these that Disney tropes can hurt a film, and even wearing its heart on its sleeve can’t save the studio from feeling contrived.
But with that out of the way it still is a great movie. The characters though somewhat tropes are very interesting. Casey comes off as very down-to-earth despite her brilliance and her genuine curiosity and excitement shines through radiantly. As the audience surrogate Robertson does a great job taking us on the journey and through her we feel like we’re experiencing these wonders too. And it seems we forget that George Clooney is really a good actor and he definitely sells it as a cynical gruff old man here. And the chemistry between Clooney and Robertson is terrific. Hugh Laurie a comic idol of mine appears here in a mostly non-comic role but is also very good. Though the standout is certainly Cassidy. Her deliveries don’t always hit but she steals a lot of scenes through her dedication and action in the film. She’s the character that takes us back to that state of child-like enjoyment and awe.
That is, when the story isn’t already doing that. The term “original story” does go a long way and though some would dispute that this film is still based on something (the Tomorrowland attraction at DisneyLand), it’s still peppered with lots of new ideas. Writers Brad Bird and Damon Lindelof poured their imagination into the concepts and styles of this film, but it still shows inspiration from other works of science fiction. Jules Verne whose novels and themes produced the original ride gets a shout-out here which I appreciate because the film feels very much Verne. There’s also one scene that pays very close homage to Terminator 2, and by the way, did you know Disney owns Star Wars? Cause there is a scene where they shove it in our faces. But it can also be expected with Brad Bird a huge Star Wars fan (and hopefully future director!). I mentioned earlier we don’t see a lot of Tomorrowland and while I wish we’d seen more, I understand why they went a different route focusing on the journey. The writing though at times very Disney has some very interesting ideas and themes. What does the future look like today? What’s more important, necessity or creativity? And until the final act ideas like these are subtle enough to keep you pondering.
But where Tomorrowland excels in its originality and imagination is in the visual style and effects. They’re beyond impressive and wonderfully creative. Brad Bird’s comfort place is in animation having been director of The Incredibles, Ratatouille, and even on The Simpsons and it shows in his visual style which is very tantalizing in its expression and atmosphere. And it works incredibly well in live-action. And I need say no more about the unique imagination: bathtubs that turn into escape pods, mid-air pools you can dive between, and many other ideas feel like they come directly from a child’s imagination. There were times particularly early on when the production design combined with story reminded me of Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory or The NeverEnding Story. And while the story beats are fairly familiar, the film still keeps you guessing as you keep wondering what you’ll see next that you’ve never seen before. The CGI on its own isn’t particularly impressive, but how it’s used in these eccentric and fun new ways makes it stand out. Bird is completely in his element and his mastery of storytelling (apart from some problems) and visual effects as a means to progress narrative and spark imagination rather than as a cheap tool shows he very well could be the next Spielberg. And I’m very excited to see what he does next!
Tomorrowland is a movie that moviegoers have almost no basis of reference, no previous knowledge of characters or setting, and no established conventions of creativity in look and style. And that’s exactly why it should be seen! It’s cinema in its best form, a work of art and entertainment that offers something new to the imagination and a unique visual splendour. It suffers in plot towards the end, but the journey to that end is well worth it! It reminds me why I love movies so much and in a summer filled with movies that while maybe good, aren’t likely to do that, it’s an amazing feat, and if nothing else, for movies, it gives me hope for the future!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Disney's Mulan, Cultural Appropriation, and Exploitation

I’m late on this one I know. I wasn’t willing to spend thirty bucks back in September for a movie experience I knew was going to be far poorer than if I had paid half that at a theatre. So I waited for it to hit streaming for free to give it a shot. In the meantime I heard that it wasn’t very good, but I remained determined not to skip it entirely, partly out of sympathy for director Niki Caro and partly out of morbid curiosity. Disney’s live-action Mulan  I was actually mildly looking forward to early in the year in spite of my well-documented distaste for this series of creative dead zones by the most powerful media conglomerate on earth. Mulan  was never one of Disney’s classics, a movie extremely of its time in its “girl power” gender politics and with a decidedly American take on ancient Chinese mythology. It got by on a couple good songs and a strong lead, but it was a movie that could be improved upon, and this new version looked like it had the potential to do that, emphasizing

The Hays Code was Bad, Sex in Movies is Good

Don't Look Now (1973) Will Hays, Who Knows About Sex In 1930, former Republican politician and chair of the Motion Picture Association of America Will Hayes introduced a series of self-censorship guidelines for the movie industry in response to a mixture of celebrity scandals and lobbying from the Catholic Church against various ‘immoralities’ creating a perception of Hollywood as corrupt and indecent. The Hays Code, or the Motion Picture Production Code, was formally adopted in 1930, though not stringently enforced until 1934 under the auspices of Joseph Breen. It laid out a careful list of what was and wasn’t acceptable for a film expecting major distribution. It stipulated rules against profanity, the depiction of miscegenation, and offensive portrayals of the clergy, but a lot of it was based around sexual content: “sexual perversion” of any kind was disallowed, as were any opaquely textual or visual allusions to reproduction, and right near the top “No licentious or suggestiv

Pixar Sundays: The Incredibles (2004)

          Brad Bird was already a master by the time he came to Pixar. Not only did he hone his craft as an early director on The Simpsons , but he directed a little animated film for Warner Bros. in 1999, that though not a box office success was loved by critics and quickly grew a cult following. The Iron Giant is now among many people’s favourite animated movies. Likewise, Bird’s feature debut at Pixar, The Incredibles , his own variation of a superhero movie, is often considered one of the studio’s best. And for very good reason, as the most talented director at Pixar shows.            Superheroes were once the world’s greatest crime-fighting force until several lawsuits for collateral damage (and in the case of Mr. Incredible, a hilarious suicide prevention), outlawed their vigilantism. Fifteen years later Mr. Incredible, now living as Bob Parr, has a family with his wife Helen, the former Elastigirl. But Bob, in a combination of mid-life crisis and nostalgia for the old day