Skip to main content

Reason for the Reboots: Disney's Ultimate Plan

               Cinderella’s coming out soon! Yeah the movie!  So I’ll be taking the tykes to the pictures in the family Volkswagen Beetle and maybe on the way home we’ll get some ice cream at the malt shop and sing along to the juke. Oh wait…its 2015?
                Yeah Disney’s been in a bit of a strange place creatively lately. While their animation studio has had a definite comeback after a few years in a rut, they haven’t exactly known what to do with their live-action division. The Narnia and Pirates of the Caribbean series seem to have run their course (or are desperately trying to add another exhausting mile to the course) and movies like The Lone Ranger, Oz: The Great and Powerful, and Alexander and the Terrible, Horrible, No-Good, Stinkin’, Rootin-tootin, Awful as Hell, I Would Kill for a Vicodin, Very Bad Day failed to make much of an impact. It’s clearly the animated films that have stood the test of time and products relating to them have sold the best. So at some point Disney decided it would be a great idea to simply remake those. But only the most famous. No one’s going to remake The Black Cauldron (despite it being perhaps most in need of a remake). It only makes sense especially considering Disney’s most successful live-action films like The Muppets and Into the Woods stick to the typical Disney animated formula.
                This idea seemed to be first realized with Tim Burton’s Alice in Wonderland –that somewhat creepy and nonsensical re-imagining of one of Disney’s more mediocre films. It was a commercial success and Disney’s been doing these colourful re-tellings ever since. And now we have Cinderella. I consider myself a fan of the 1950 classic, one of the best executed Disney films of all time, so I have mixed feelings. Yeah it looks visually interesting and promising, but that’s exactly how Maleficent lured us in. It stars great actors like Cate Blanchett and Hayley Atwell, but it’s gotten rid of the lovable Jaq and Gus. So I’m not sure how I’ll react to it but I’m confident it will be a hit as well (if for nothing else that Frozen short). Same goes for The Jungle Book, Beauty and the Beast, The Little Mermaid, and whatever else is on the remake slate.
                But I’m starting to think there’s a greater point to these films than simply to make a lot of money. Certainly that plays a large factor but then why didn't they start doing this back when 101 Dalmatians was a big success in 1996? I think Disney started looking at some of their other properties and subsidiaries of which Marvel Studios is undoubtedly the most successful, making film after film that interweave splendidly into a common continuity. Disney has also been paying attention to how well their Princess-line products have been selling since forever and came up with a common plan.
Yep. We’re building towards a Disney Cinematic Universe! Think about it. Disney’s seen Marvel’s strategy and much like DC, wants to mimic it. They couldn't go full Avengers-mode because of the hand-drawn to CGI animation ratio and the awkwardness of combining them. Much like DC in order to achieve their universe, they have to reboot. And it’s not a bad idea as you know someone somewhere has complained at there being only one female Avenger, so a whole team of Disney princesses interacting in an interconnected universe is bound to both make them happy and increase interest in this reinterpretation of a world. And is it just coincidence that Kenneth Branagh and Jon Favreau have both directed an installment in each universe? They’ve been building on it for a few years and in less than a decade we’ll have a team of Disney leading ladies uniting against evil including at least Alice, Aurora, Cinderella, and Belle. Maybe Jasmine or Mulan will also appear and spin-off into their own films. But, I know what you’re thinking: what about The Jungle Book? Disney’s remaking that and it doesn't have a princess? You are of course right as despite that haircut Mowgli is indeed a boy. But think about this, when Disneyvengers happens, they’re going to need a good villain. And of all the Disney movies on the remake slate so far, which has the best villain? The Jungle Book of course! Who better than the suave, smooth-talking, cunning Shere Khan to face off against our heroines? I mean they cast Idris Elba in the role, clearly he’s meant for bigger things! But don’t worry, The Jungle Book Part II will be a better showcase for Mowgli and Baloo as they meet up with Tarzan and Jane, Pocahontas, and Bambi no doubt setting the stage for Disney’s Civil War: Nature vs. MAN!
I for one am excited to see this universe realized. It’s the only explanation for these Disney remakes, as obviously it can't just be that Disney's out of live-action ideas and are scraping the bottom of the barrel creatively; and whether bad or good I’m looking forward to the results. Good luck to the DCU; at least its chances are no worse (maybe better) than the DCCU.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Disney's Mulan, Cultural Appropriation, and Exploitation

I’m late on this one I know. I wasn’t willing to spend thirty bucks back in September for a movie experience I knew was going to be far poorer than if I had paid half that at a theatre. So I waited for it to hit streaming for free to give it a shot. In the meantime I heard that it wasn’t very good, but I remained determined not to skip it entirely, partly out of sympathy for director Niki Caro and partly out of morbid curiosity. Disney’s live-action Mulan  I was actually mildly looking forward to early in the year in spite of my well-documented distaste for this series of creative dead zones by the most powerful media conglomerate on earth. Mulan  was never one of Disney’s classics, a movie extremely of its time in its “girl power” gender politics and with a decidedly American take on ancient Chinese mythology. It got by on a couple good songs and a strong lead, but it was a movie that could be improved upon, and this new version looked like it had the potential to do that, emphasizing
Post a Comment
Read more

The Hays Code was Bad, Sex in Movies is Good

Don't Look Now (1973) Will Hays, Who Knows About Sex In 1930, former Republican politician and chair of the Motion Picture Association of America Will Hayes introduced a series of self-censorship guidelines for the movie industry in response to a mixture of celebrity scandals and lobbying from the Catholic Church against various ‘immoralities’ creating a perception of Hollywood as corrupt and indecent. The Hays Code, or the Motion Picture Production Code, was formally adopted in 1930, though not stringently enforced until 1934 under the auspices of Joseph Breen. It laid out a careful list of what was and wasn’t acceptable for a film expecting major distribution. It stipulated rules against profanity, the depiction of miscegenation, and offensive portrayals of the clergy, but a lot of it was based around sexual content: “sexual perversion” of any kind was disallowed, as were any opaquely textual or visual allusions to reproduction, and right near the top “No licentious or suggestiv
Post a Comment
Read more

Pixar Sundays: The Incredibles (2004)

          Brad Bird was already a master by the time he came to Pixar. Not only did he hone his craft as an early director on The Simpsons , but he directed a little animated film for Warner Bros. in 1999, that though not a box office success was loved by critics and quickly grew a cult following. The Iron Giant is now among many people’s favourite animated movies. Likewise, Bird’s feature debut at Pixar, The Incredibles , his own variation of a superhero movie, is often considered one of the studio’s best. And for very good reason, as the most talented director at Pixar shows.            Superheroes were once the world’s greatest crime-fighting force until several lawsuits for collateral damage (and in the case of Mr. Incredible, a hilarious suicide prevention), outlawed their vigilantism. Fifteen years later Mr. Incredible, now living as Bob Parr, has a family with his wife Helen, the former Elastigirl. But Bob, in a combination of mid-life crisis and nostalgia for the old day
1 comment
Read more