Taika Waititi was not the right person to make Klara and the Sun . There were several moments while watching this adaptation of the bestselling novel by Kazuo Ishiguro that I could see exactly what Waititi was going for and how it would work in the hands of a director like Steven Spielberg or Guillermo del Toro, Jean-Pierre Jeunet or even Wes Anderson. Hell, Hirokazu Kore-eda proved this year with the similar Sheep in the Box that he was capable of handling a sentimental story about a child-like artificial consciousness. But Waititi, who does have real strengths as a director, is not convincingly capable of the required level of earnestness here and he can't help himself when it comes to certain proclivities with his dialogue and characterization -which have their place in his other films but feel quite inappropriate here. For one thing, Klara and the Sun is set in a dystopia that is never treated as such by the narrative, merely alluded to on a few brief occasions and as quickly...
The story of Wicker feels like it ought to predate that of the movie it is at risk of being confused with, The Wicker Man . It is credited to a fable called “The Wicker Husband”, which might be an old folktale from the pre-Norman past of England for its parable-like moral narrative and lack of official names for any of its characters who might as well be mere metaphorical symbols. But in actual fact it was a short story written just a few years ago by Ursula Wills, who does a remarkable job in adopting that particular style and character in a convincing but thoroughly contemporary manner. I can’t imagine a woman’s agency being all that popular a topic in even the pagan days of yore. It is filtered into movie form by directors Alex Huston Fischer and Eleanor Wilson, and while I can’t say whether its particular sense of humour and ironic tone is native to its source, it detracts surprisingly little from the ethos being communicated -that ethos being a rather stark reworking of Beauty an...