It was perhaps obligation that created this movie. Jane Austen adaptations are a reliable brand and they come in generational cycles -every decade or so brings a new version of one of her classic books to television, and occasionally to film. We have seen in recent years new iterations of Pride and Prejudice , Emma , and Persuasion . And with Mansfield Park being not an attractive prospect for adaptation, Northanger Abbey being obscure, and Sandington even more so -that leaves Sense and Sensibility as thus the sensible choice of source. And it has been some time since Austen’s debut masterpiece has gotten such a treatment, the likely reason being the enormous shadow cast by the 1995 film version by Emma Thompson and Ang Lee -a very definitive adaptation that not only won Thompson a screenwriting Oscar but that set a standard for most Austen adaptations and romantic period dramas alike that have come since. Its influence is clear and unavoidable on this new film thirty-one years lat...
I'll say this as someone with a passing awareness of the Street Fighter game franchise and its characters: this movie appears to be a fairly accurate representation of its source, for whatever that is worth. Aesthetically, it does indeed look like Street Fighter -as flashy and colourful and as ludicrous as ever. Its characters are an eclectic mix of styles and erratic fashion statements, its world is appropriately broad and silly. Yet none of that makes the movie itself good, points though it does at least earn for some visual effort. The first theatrically released film under the Capcom brand since the last Street Fighter adaptation in 1994, the movie comes from of all people director Kitao Sakurai -best known for his work on The Eric Andre Show . Andre himself appears in the movie naturally as one of a few comic relief roles, and the particular chaotic comedy energy his work is known for can be found pervasive throughout the movie -though it is not a particularly good look. St...