There is a gender wedge key to the principal conflict of The Roses that goes mostly unstated. The destruction of one career simultaneous to the eruption of another may be what caused the spark, but the notion of the woman in the marriage being the breadwinner for the man is what lit the fuse. As much as emotions and repressed resentments come into focus, personal priorities, actions, and manipulations inform the enmity, this disruption of the presupposed status quo is what really cannot be forgiven. The Roses is the second major adaptation of Warren Adler’s 1981 novel The War of the Roses , after the 1989 film of the same name directed by Danny DeVito -though like that movie this one changes the given names of its protagonists. More than that, it rearranges the premise substantially, moving the action geographically and just about all of the causes in the rift between its couple -in the hands of director Jay Roach resembling more the aesthetics of a conventional American com...
Criticism, Essays, and Ramblings from Another Online Film Critic. Support me on Patreon at https://www.patreon.com/JordanBosch, follow me on BlueSky at https://bsky.app/profile/jordanbosch.bsky.social and jbosch on Letterboxd